Effectiveness of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
1Department of Physiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
3Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Kasturba Medical Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
4Department of Biostatistics, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
Corresponding author: Sampath Kumar Amaravadi Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman 4184, United Arab Emirates. Tel: +971-543204752, Fax: +971-67431222, E-mail: sampathkpt@gmail.com
• Received: February 3, 2021 • Revised: April 6, 2021 • Accepted: May 17, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
To determine the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength (RMS), and functional capacity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to June 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated patients who underwent cardiac surgery were included in this review. Meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model showed that the mean difference in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 6-minute walk distance, and RMS was 3.47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 6.36), 5.80% (95% CI, 2.03 to 9.56), 78.05 m (95% CI, 60.92 to 95.18), and 4.8 cmH2O (95% CI, -4.00 to 13.4), respectively. There is strong evidence that IMT improves inspiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, and functional capacity, and reduces the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Cardiovascular diseases, especially coronary heart disease, have become the main cause of morbidity and mortality in India [1]. In 2017, 17.8 million deaths due to cardiovascular diseases were reported globally [2]. Worldwide, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is performed daily in patients with coronary artery disease [3]. Valve repair or replacement is the treatment of choice for patients with valve diseases [4].
Despite advances in surgical procedures, the risk of postoperative complications still exists, as surgeries are now being performed on high-risk patients [5]. It is well known that cardiac surgery causes postoperative pulmonary dysfunction [6], which results in increased effort for breathing, hypoventilation, ineffective cough, and hypoxemia, which leads to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), such as atelectasis, bronchospasm, pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, prolonged mechanical ventilation, diaphragmatic dysfunction, and pleural disorders [7,8].
Respiratory muscle dysfunction is a consequence of numerous factors. The grafts harvested for CABG, specifically the internal mammary artery graft, reduces blood supply to the intercostal muscles, which leads to respiratory muscle weakness [9,10]. The median sternotomy incision results in pain and altered chest wall mechanics. Sedation and pain together can result in shallow breathing and hypoventilation. All these reduce pulmonary function [9,11].
In addition, the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, topical cooling for myocardial protection (phrenic nerve injury) [6], use of chest drains, especially intercostal drains, further reduces pulmonary function [9]. Even after 1 year, the pulmonary function remains reduced and is not restored to preoperative levels, although the reduction is lesser than that after 4–5 months; compared with the 6%–13% reduction in pulmonary function at 4–5 months, there is a reduction of 4%–5% at 1 year [12]. Pulmonary dysfunction is significant in the early postoperative period, and is the primary cause of PPCs, morbidity, and mortality. However, the clinical significance of decreased pulmonary function at 1 year postoperatively is not known [12,13].
Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) targets the respiratory muscles by increasing the load to inspiration, thereby increasing strength and endurance. Inspiratory muscles respond in a manner similar to that of the other skeletal muscles. IMT has been found to increase strength in healthy individuals, mechanically ventilated patients, and patients with chronic heart failure [14]. Many interventions, such as early mobilization, diaphragmatic breathing exercises, and the active cycle of breathing technique, are traditionally practiced postoperatively in the intensive care unit to prevent the risk of postsurgical pulmonary complications. In addition, devices such as positive expiratory pressure devices, IMT devices, and incentive spirometers are used to reduce the incidence of PPCs after cardiac surgeries [7,15]. Prerehabilitation also plays a vital role as it assists the individual to withstand predicted cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal challenges postcardiac surgery [14]. Mobilization of the extremities; IMT; and IMT using a device that includes isocapnic/normocapnic hyperpnea training, inspiratory resistive flow training, inspiratory threshold pressure training, and incentive spirometry is part of prehabilitation [14]. IMT can also be used in phase II of cardiac rehabilitation along with aerobic training or resistance exercises in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as evidence has shown improvements in respiratory muscle strength (RMS) in this population [3].
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effects of IMT on RMS, pulmonary function, and functional capacity in individuals undergoing cardiac surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. This systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO on July 7, 2020 (Registration No.CRD42020179130) and the Center for Open Science (OSF) registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/U6VNM).
Search strategy
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2020. The following keywords were used for the search: “cardiac surgeries,” “cardiac surgical procedures,” “inspiratory muscle training,” “respiratory muscle training,” “preoperative physiotherapy,” “preoperative care,” “respiratory muscle strength,” “CABG,” “coronary artery bypass grafting,” “valve replacement,” “heart valve replacement surgery,” “congenital disability,” “congenital disability correction,” “functional capacity,” and “cardiac rehabilitation.” The Boolean operators used were “AND,” “OR,” and “NOT.” The search was limited to articles published in English.
Eligibility criteria and study selection
All randomized controlled trials that evaluated patients who underwent cardiac surgeries and were given IMT, either preoperatively or postoperatively, were included in this review.
The outcomes that had to be assessed were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure, and 6-minute walk test. The secondary outcomes to be investigated were the length of hospital stay and the incidence of PPCs.
For the study to be eligible, (1) it should have enrolled adults above 18 years of age, regardless of their gender and (2) it should have at least one outcome measure considered for this systematic review.
The studies were excluded for the following reasons: (1) studies with incomplete data (data in the form of graphs), (2) studies published in languages other than English, (3) studies that did not evaluate any of the outcomes considered for our systematic review, and (4) studies on neonates and children
The selected studies were downloaded from Mendeley, and retrieved articles were screened for duplicates by two authors (ASK and FVD). For articles that were eligible based on their titles and abstracts, the full text was obtained and re-evaluated to verify whether they met the inclusion criteria. The process of screening and assessment of retrieved studies for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis is presented in Fig. 1.
Data extraction
A data extraction template was developed, pilot tested, and modified. Data extracted included author names, study title, objective, design, participant characteristics, and intervention details. The authors were contacted if the outcome data were unclear or not reported. Data were extracted independently by one researcher, while another researcher cross-checked the same, and the following information was retrieved: the age of the participants included in the study, the type of IMT given, the number of days of preoperative or postoperative intervention, the intensity and time duration per session, and the outcome measures assessed in each study (both primary and secondary). The details of each study are summarized in Table 1.
Assessment of risk of bias
The risk of bias for studies included in this systematic review was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist, as shown in Table 2. This checklist provides an overall score of 27, representing reporting quality, internal validity (confounding bias), power, and external validity. The items are rated as 1 for “Yes” and 0 for “No” or “unable to determine.”
Data synthesis
Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model when at least two studies were similar in terms of the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes process and study design. As all the outcomes were continuous, mean difference was computed as the effect measure. The chi-square statistic was used (p<0.1 was considered statistically significant) to assess heterogeneity and the I2 statistic (value >60% was considered substantial heterogeneity) was used to quantify heterogeneity as percentage. RevMan 5.2 software was used for meta-analysis. We present forest plots for all meta-analyses. When the meta-analysis was not possible, the mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) is presented.
RESULTS
The computerized database search retrieved 184 articles, of which 16 were selected for full-text review, and five were included in the final review.
Articles were excluded based on study methodology, languages other than English, outcome measures other than those to be analyzed in the review, and articles with inadequate data on outcome measures. Data from 293 participants were analyzed. The intervention and control groups included 144 and 149 patients admitted for cardiac surgery, respectively. All participants were older than 18 years. The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Participants were recruited from hospitals or outpatient clinics.
Functional capacity
Four studies assessed functional capacity as measured by the 6-minute walk test as an outcome [3,16-18]. There were 46 participants in the intervention group and 150 in the control group. The heterogeneity (I2) was 0% (PHeterogeneity=0.53). Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvement in the 6-minute walk distance with a mean difference of 78.05 m (95% CI, 60.92 to 95.18) (Fig. 2).
Pulmonary function
FVC
Two studies analyzed FVC [8,18]. A total of 108 and 109 participants were included in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The heterogeneity (I2) was 0% (PHeterogeneity=0.72). These studies reported significant improvement in FVC in the intervention group compared to that in the control group, with a mean difference of 3.47% (95% CI, 0.57 to 6.36) (Fig. 3).
FEV1
Two studies analyzed FEV1 [8,18]. The intervention and control groups comprised of 108 and 109 participants, respectively. The heterogeneity (I2) was 0% (PHeterogeneity=0.20). These studies reported remarkable improvement in FEV1 with a mean difference of 5.80% (95% CI, 2.03 to 9.56) (Fig. 4).
FEV1/FVC ratio
One study reported the effect of IMT on the FEV1/FVC ratio [8]. There were 98 and 99 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively. There was a mean difference of 0.47 (95% CI, 2.37 to 3.31).
Respiratory muscle strength
Maximal inspiratory pressure
Three studies with a total of 244 participants evaluated MIP as an outcome [8,16,18]. A total of 119 participants received IMT and 125 participants formed the control group. The heterogeneity (I2) was 69% (PHeterogeneity=0.53). These studies reported that there was an improvement in MIP in the intervention group compared to that in the control group, with a mean difference of 4.70 cmH2O (95% CI, -4.00 to 13.4) (Fig. 5).
Maximal expiratory pressure
One study, which included 10 participants, documented the effects of IMT on maximal expiratory pressure [18]. There was a difference of -2.1 cmH2O that favored the control group.
Length of hospital stay
Four studies included in the review measured the length of hospital stay as an outcome [8,16-18]. The intervention and control groups included 132 and 137 participants, respectively. There was a mean difference of -1.82 days (95% CI, -2.45 to -1.18). The length of hospital stay of participants given IMT, either preoperatively or postoperatively, was significantly shorter than that of participants in the control group (Fig. 6).
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of IMT in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. The results of the meta-analysis suggest that there is a remarkable improvement in RMS, functional capacity, and lung function. However, the included studies showed heterogeneity in variables such as training period (preoperative IMT or postoperative IMT) and duration of sessions. Only one study used IMT in the preoperative phase. Dos Santos et al. [3] reported on IMT in the second phase of cardiac rehabilitation, whereas in three studies, it was provided during the first phase of cardiac rehabilitation. The first phase of cardiac rehabilitation refers to rehabilitation during hospitalization. The second phase includes rehabilitation up to 4 months after discharge from the hospital and consists of monitored outpatient physical activity as recommended by the physician. Subsequently, the third phase of cardiac rehabilitation involves a permanent, unmonitored exercise program [19]. We conducted a meta-analysis of all included studies, which indicated an improvement in RMS, functional capacity as measured by the 6-minute walk distance, and lung function.
RMS was evaluated as the primary outcome in this systematic review and meta-analysis. RMS is reduced in all individuals undergoing cardiac surgery. Previous studies have shown that neural conditioning caused by repeated exposure to the same task improves RMS by improving neuromuscular recruitment patterns [8]. According to Zanini et al. [18], RMS improves by the 30th postoperative day and that there is no significant improvement in the IMT group compared to other groups. Moreover, reversal of RMS has been reported due to the additional effect of expiratory positive airway pressure and not IMT alone. However, Cordeiro et al. [16] noted better RMS at the time of discharge in a population who underwent IMT post-surgery. This difference could be due to the higher resistance used by Cordeiro et al. [16] or the difference in the population. Meta-analysis reported the highest heterogeneity, I2=69%.
De Menezes et al. [20] reported that reduced RMS was associated with decreased functional capacity and an increased period of recovery of lung function, as it is directly related to peripheral muscle strength. Therefore, improvement in RMS can improve FVC and FEV1 and thereby the 6-minute walking distance. We included two studies to analyze the effects of IMT on FVC and FEV1. A meta-analysis of both studies showed an improvement in FVC, irrespective of whether IMT was administered preoperatively or postoperatively. Nevertheless, the study by Zanini et al. [18], which assessed postoperative intervention, reported better improvement than the study by Chen et al. [8]. The study by Shenkman et al. [21] reported that individuals with CABG had a 70% reduction in FVC immediately postoperatively and a reduction of 35% at 3 weeks after surgery.
PPCs usually prolong the postoperative length of hospital stay. Previous studies by Hulzebos et al. [22] reported that preoperative IMT reduced the incidence of PPCs. In addition, a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Gomes et al. [23] showed similar findings. In our review, only the study by Chen et al. [8] reported the reduction of PPCs after preoperative IMT, but other studies have not focused on this aspect.
Four studies with no heterogeneity (I2=0%) were used for meta-analysis of the length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis indicated that there was a significant improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group. A reduction in the length of stay can be associated with a reduction in PPCs in the intervention group. Improved inspiratory muscle strength improves the efficacy of cough, and thereby, clearance of secretions and reduction in PPCs.
This systematic review and meta-analysis has a few limitations. Only five articles, with intervention administered either preoperatively or postoperatively, were eligible for the systematic review. We were unable to compare studies with preoperative IMT with those with postoperative IMT, as very few studies with independent preoperative IMT were available. The sample size was small, and one study included data from only males in the interpretation of results [16]. In addition, we included studies in which intervention was provided at different time intervals. Furthermore, differences in exercise intensities and duration of sessions may have also contributed to the heterogeneity, which was unavoidable as there are very few studies on this subject. Hence, further studies are required to determine whether IMT helps improve RMS, functional capacity, and pulmonary function.
In conclusion, the authors recommend the use of IMT, either before or after cardiac surgery, as it successfully improves pulmonary function, inspiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and duration of hospitalization.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: Kumar S, Dsouza F, Samuel S. Methodology: Dsouza F. Formal analysis: Ravishankar N, Dsouza, Kumar S, Samuel S. Project administration: Kumar S. Visualization: Samuel S, Kumar S, Raghavan H. Writing–original draft: Dsouza F, Kumar S. Writing–review and editing: Kumar S, Dsouza F, Samuel S. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.
Fig. 1.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in the 6-minute walk distance.
Fig. 3.
Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in forced vital capacity.
Fig. 4.
Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Fig. 5.
Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in maximal inspiratory pressure.
Fig. 6.
Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in length of hospital stay.
IMT with pressure linear load device (PowerBreathe)
IMT with minimal load (9 cm H2O) and fixed at the same intensity throughout the training period
12 weeks
5 sets of 10 repetitions with 1 minute interval between the sets 50% MIP for 2 weeks, resistance increased by 5% every week up to 8 weeks, then load is adjusted weekly to maintain 80% MIP
2. GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1151-210.
3. Dos Santos TD, Pereira SN, Portela LO, Cardoso DM, Lago PD, Dos Santos Guarda N, et al. Moderate-tohigh intensity inspiratory muscle training improves the effects of combined training on exercise capacity in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Cardiol 2019;279:40-6.
4. Sibilitz KL, Berg SK, Hansen TB, Risom SS, Rasmussen TB, Hassager C, et al. Effect of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation after heart valve surgery (CopenHeart VR): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Trials 2013;14:1-14.
6. Wynne R, Botti M. Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in adults after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: clinical significance and implications for practice. Am J Crit Care 2004;13:384-93.
7. Shakouri SK, Salekzamani Y, Taghizadieh A, SabbaghJadid H, Soleymani J, Sahebi L, et al. Effect of respiratory rehabilitation before open cardiac surgery on respiratory function: a randomized clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2015;7:13-7.
8. Chen X, Hou L, Zhang Y, Liu X, Shao B, Yuan B, et al. The effects of five days of intensive preoperative inspiratory muscle training on postoperative complications and outcome in patients having cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2019;33:913-22.
9. Baumgarten MC, Garcia GK, Frantzeski MH, Giacomazzi CM, Lagni VB, Dias AS, et al. Pain and pulmonary function in patients submitted to heart surgery via sternotomy. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2009;24:497-505.
10. Praveen R, Swaminathan N, Praveen JS. Inspiratory muscle training is effective in improving respiratory muscle functions in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft. Fizjoterapia Polska 2009;9:285-92.
11. Siafakas NM, Mitrouska I, Bouros D, Georgopoulos D. Surgery and the respiratory muscles. Thorax 1999;54:458-65.
12. Westerdahl E, Jonsson M, Emtner M. Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life 1-year follow up after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;11:99.
13. Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Bryngelsson I, Tenling A. Pulmonary function 4 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Respir Med 2003;97:317-22.
14. Mans CM, Reeve JC, Elkins MR. Postoperative outcomes following preoperative inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing cardiothoracic or upper abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta analysis. Clin Rehabil 2015;29:426-38.
16. Cordeiro AL, de Melo TA, Neves D, Luna J, Esquivel MS, Guimaraes AR, et al. Inspiratory muscle training and functional capacity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016;31:140-4.
17. Cargnin C, Karsten M, Guaragna JC, Dal Lago P. Inspiratory muscle training after heart valve replacement surgery improves inspiratory muscle strength, lung function, and functional capacity: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2019;39:E1-E7.
18. Zanini M, Nery RM, de Lima JB, Buhler RP, da Silveira AD, Stein R. Effects of different rehabilitation protocols in inpatient cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2019;39:E19-E25.
20. De Menezes TC, Bassi D, Cavalcanti RC, Barros JE, Granja KS, Calles AC, et al. Comparisons and correlations of pain intensity and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength in the pre- and postoperative periods of cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2018;30:479-86.
21. Shenkman Z, Shir Y, Weiss YG, Bleiberg B, Gross D. The effects of cardiac surgery on early and late pulmonary functions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1193-9.
23. Gomes Neto M, Martinez BP, Reis HF, Carvalho VO. Pre- and postoperative inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2017;31:454-64.
Nursing Care Across the Clinical Continuum of TAVI: A Systematic Review of Multidisciplinary Roles Anna Jendrzejczak, Jadwiga Klukow, Joanna Czerwik-Marcinkowska, Wojciech Styk, Szymon Zmorzynski Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(13): 4535. CrossRef
The Effects of Pursed Lip Breathing Exercises on Patients' Post‐Bronchoscopy Recovery Parameters: A Nurse‐Led Quasi‐Experimental Study Rasha Abdulhalim Alqadi, Azza Ibrahim Abdelkader Habiba, Hanaa Hamad Mohamed El Sayed Akl, Engy AbdelRhman Khamis, Daniel Joseph E. Berdida Nursing & Health Sciences.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Inspiratory Muscle Training Improved Cardiorespiratory Performance in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Chitima Kulchanarat, Suphannee Choeirod, Supattra Thadatheerapat, Dusarkorn Piathip, Opas Satdhabudha, Kornanong Yuenyongchaiwat Advances in Respiratory Medicine.2025; 93(3): 10. CrossRef
Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact Abdulla A. Damluji, Corey R. Tomczak, Stephanie Hiser, Deirdre E. O’Neill, Parag Goyal, Quinn R. Pack, Stephen J. Foulkes, Todd M. Brown, Mark J. Haykowsky, Dale M. Needham, Daniel E. Forman Circulation Research.2025; 137(2): 255. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique in Improving Physiological and Functional Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Narrative Review Arnengsih Nazir Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2025; Volume 18: 5431. CrossRef
Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Cardiomyopathy: Systematic Review Hanifa Suleman, Zohaib Shahid, Muhammad Naveed Babur, Abdul Wadood, Khizar Abid, Muhammad Ali Khan, Asna Waseem The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences.2025; 5(1): 233. CrossRef
Respiratory therapy with positive expiratory pressure in patients after left ventricle geometric reconstruction Maksim L. Mamalyga, Mikhail M. Alshibaya, Mark A. Zatenko, Sergey A. Danilov, Gela G. Getsadze, Sergey L. Babak RUDN Journal of Medicine.2025; 29(2): 162. CrossRef
Respiratory Muscle Training Combinations in Amateur Runners: A Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Function, Respiratory Muscle Strength, and Exercise Capacity Eunho Lee, Jinseop Kim Bioengineering.2025; 13(1): 11. CrossRef
Can resistance prehabilitation training bring additional benefits in valvular cardiac surgery? protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jorge Montero-Cámara, Francisco José Ferrer-Sargues, María José Segrera Rovira, Adrián Sarria Cabello, David Cuesta Peredo, Juan Antonio Margarit Calabuig, Noemí Valtueña-Gimeno, María Luz Sánchez-Sánchez, Robert Jeenchen Chen PLOS ONE.2024; 19(5): e0303163. CrossRef
Effectiveness of improving coordination abilities after cardiac surgery: a review Natalya V. Arkhipova, Svetlana A. Pomeshkina, Evgeniy V. Bykov Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 23(3): 52. CrossRef
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Phase 1 and 2 Postoperative Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Clênia Oliveira Araújo, Carla Cristina Araújo Alves, Francisco R A dos Santos, Lawrence P Cahalin, Graziella França Bernardelli Cipriano, Gerson Cipriano Physical Therapy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery Linqi Fang, Anqi Cheng, Zhaohua Zhu, Mengming Shao, Guoai Wang Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention.2024; 44(5): 324. CrossRef
Effects of preoperative respiratory muscle training for improvement of postoperative health related quality of life in mitral valve replacement patients Umama Umar, Ahad Hussain, Komal Tariq Physiotherapy Research International.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Benefits from Implementing Low- to High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review Aphrodite Evangelodimou, Irini Patsaki, Alexandros Andrikopoulos, Foteini Chatzivasiloglou, Stavros Dimopoulos Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease.2024; 11(12): 380. CrossRef
The impact of threshold-loaded inspiratory muscle training and respiratory biofeedback on preserving inspiratory muscle strength and vital capacity after CABG: a randomized clinical trial Bahareh Mehregan-Far American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease.2024; 14(6): 375. CrossRef
Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in commercial respiratory interventions: an evidence-based guide for health and exercise professionals Camilla R. Illidi, Lee M. Romer, Michael A. Johnson, Neil C. Williams, Harry B. Rossiter, Richard Casaburi, Nicholas B. Tiller European Journal of Applied Physiology.2023; 123(8): 1599. CrossRef
Inspiratory Muscle and Functional Performance of Patients Entering Cardiac Rehabilitation after Cardiac Valve Replacement Sabine Gempel, Meryl Cohen, Eryn Milian, Melany Vidret, Andrew Smith, Ian Jones, Yessenia Orozco, Neva Kirk-Sanchez, Lawrence P. Cahalin Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease.2023; 10(4): 142. CrossRef
Comparison of Effects of Liuzijue Exercise and Conventional Respiratory Training on Patients after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Qiao-li Zhang, Min Ge, Cheng Chen, Fu-dong Fan, Yan Jin, Ning Zhang, Lei Wang Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.2023; 29(7): 579. CrossRef
Inspiratory muscle training to reduce risk of pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yuping Xiang, Qin Zhao, Tinahui Luo, Ling Zeng Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on pre- and post-operative transcatheter aortic valve replacement prognoses Jieru Zou, Jie Yuan, Jingjin Liu, Qingshan Geng Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) on Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sisi Zhang, Bo Li, Xiaoping Meng, Houjuan Zuo, Dayi Hu Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Resistance exercise for cardiac rehabilitation Danielle L. Kirkman, Duck-chul Lee, Salvatore Carbone Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases.2022; 70: 66. CrossRef
Respiratory Muscle Strength in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Different Musculoskeletal Disorders E. D. Bazdyrev, N. A. Terentyeva, N. A. Galimova, K. E. Krivoshapova, O. L. Barbarash Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology.2022; 18(4): 393. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Fig. 1. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart.
Fig. 2. Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in the 6-minute walk distance.
Fig. 3. Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in forced vital capacity.
Fig. 4. Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Fig. 5. Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in maximal inspiratory pressure.
Fig. 6. Forest plot comparing the intervention group versus control group in length of hospital stay.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Effectiveness of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Respiratory Muscle Strength in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgeries: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
IMT with pressure linear load device (PowerBreathe)
IMT with minimal load (9 cm H2O) and fixed at the same intensity throughout the training period
12 weeks
5 sets of 10 repetitions with 1 minute interval between the sets 50% MIP for 2 weeks, resistance increased by 5% every week up to 8 weeks, then load is adjusted weekly to maintain 80% MIP
, Sampath Kumar Amaravadi, PhD1,2
