• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Articles

Original Article

The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients

Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011;35(3):309-315.
Published online: June 30, 2011

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju 690-756, Korea.

Corresponding author: Min Ho Chun. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, Pungnab 2-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3800, Fax: +82-2-3010-6964, mhchun@amc.seoul.kr
• Received: February 19, 2010   • Accepted: November 23, 2010

Copyright © 2011 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 8,741 Views
  • 212 Download
  • 72 Crossref
next
  • Objective
    To investigate the effect of virtual reality training on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.
  • Method
    Twenty-four stroke patients (14 males and 10 females, mean age=64.7) who had unilateral spatial neglect as a result of right hemisphere stroke were recruited. All patients were randomly assigned to either the virtual reality (VR) group (n=12) or the control group (n=12). The VR group received VR training, which stimulated the left side of their bodies. The control group received conventional neglect therapy such as visual scanning training. Both groups received therapy for 30 minutes a day, five days per week for three weeks. Outcome measurements included star cancellation test, line bisection test, Catherine Bergego scale (CBS), and the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI). These measurements were taken before and after treatment.
  • Results
    There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics and initial values between the two groups. The changes in star cancellation test results and CBS in the VR group were significantly higher than those of the control group after treatment. The changes in line bisection test score and the K-MBI in the VR group were not statistically significant.
  • Conclusion
    This study suggests that virtual reality training may be a beneficial therapeutic technique on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.
Unilateral spatial neglect is a syndrome in which patients act as if whole regions of space contralateral to their damaged brain lesions do not exist although their visual field is normal. This unilateral spatial neglect generally results from right hemisphere damage and may also results from damaged parietal lobe, frontal lobe, thalamus, or basal ganglia.1-3 Patients with unilateral spatial neglect are not aware of any damage on the paretic side, so they may bump into an object or face ambulatory risks or high risks of falling. These patients are limited in their ability to carry out activities of daily living, such as getting dressed and practicing personal hygiene.4,5 Previous studies have found that unilateral spatial neglect independently affected trunk balance in stroke patients.6 Other studies also found that unilateral spatial neglect affected trunk balance six to twelve weeks after stroke occurrence.7 In addition, unilateral spatial neglect hampers effects of rehabilitation treatments and slows down functional recovery. The most common treatment for unilateral spatial neglect is visual tracking. Additionally, other treatment methods have been tested.8 In particular, prism therapy was reported to maintain therapeutic effects compared to other therapies.9 Beis et al.10 reported that blindfolding the damaged eye improved unilateral spatial neglect by inducing eyeballs to move toward the paretic side. Schindler et al.11 reported that unilateral spatial neglect could be temporally improved by inducing eyeballs to move toward the paretic side with stimulation of the vestibular organ. However, these studies have their own limitations because they were not conducted on patients.
A virtual reality (VR) is a computer-generated environment in which people can feel and interact with neighboring situations in three dimensions. It minimizes the gap between a lab environment and an actual situation, and the therapy can be applied using the interface regardless of physical impairments.12 Due to these beneficial aspects, VR therapy is widely used as treatment and is an assessment tool for brain-injured patients. In particular, it was reported that the therapy was effective in improving cognitive functions such as memory and concentration.13,14 Recently, a small number of techniques based on VR have been suggested for the treatment of unilateral spatial neglect.15-17 However, few studies have shown the effect of VR therapy. Furthermore, few studies have examined the effects of VR therapy compared to other treatment methods through randomized controlled trials.
Thus, this study was designed to determine if VR therapy would improve unilateral spatial neglect in comparison to conventional rehabilitation programs, with the goal of it becoming the recommended therapy in unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation.
Subjects
The study was conducted on stroke patients who were diagnosed as unilateral spatial neglect through the line bisection test or star cancellation test out of those admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation from September 2008 to October 2009. Patients who had the following problems were excluded: 1) Patients with severe cognitive impairment or aphasia who could not understand the instructions given by therapists, 2) patients who had so severely damaged sitting balance that they could not sit down on a chair with a back and armrests, 3) patients with problems in cervical movement due to orthopedic impairment, and 4) patients who could not recognize objects on a computer screen due to severely damaged eyesight. A total of 24 patients were selected and randomly assigned to either the control group or the VR group. The control group was 67.2 years old on average while the VR group was 62.3 years old. The mean elapsed times from the outbreak of stroke to the start of rehabilitation were 25.5 and 22.8 days, respectively. Their dominant limb was right, and they had right cerebral artery infarction. No significant differences in age, elapsed time, and Korean Mini-Mental State Examination existed between the control group and the VR group (Table 1).
Method
Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and cognitive therapy of the same intensity and time were applied to all patients. In addition, two occupational therapists conducted treatment for unilateral spatial neglect. One therapist conducted conventional rehabilitation programs for the control group, such as visual tracking, reading and writing, drawing and copying, and puzzles, while the other conducted the virtual reality treatment on the VR group. Such treatments were applied for thirty minutes a day, once a day and five days a week for three weeks. The VR system (IREX system®, Vivid group, Toronto, Canada) consists of a monitor, a video camera, computer-recognizing gloves, and virtual objects (Fig. 1-A). The video camera recognizes movements or position of a patient and transfers him or her to the virtual space. The computer gloves read responses of a patient to the virtual reality. All patients sat in a wheelchair because they could not be trained while standing. The VR training is composed of three programs at a time. "Bird and Ball" is a program in which a patient touches a flying ball with his or her hand and turns it into a bird (Fig. 1-B). The second program, "Coconut," is a program in which a patient catches a coconut falling from a tree while moving around (Fig. 1-C). In the third program, "Container," a patient moves a box carried in a container to the opposite side (Fig. 1-D). In the three programs, patients were told to use non-paretic right hands against the left stimulation. When patients were not able to respond to the stimuli, the therapist encouraged them to respond. Calibration was made for three minutes before the start of the training. There were 150 seconds of resting between programs and 30 seconds between treatments. Each session was repeated three times.
Assessment method
The two groups took the star cancellation test, line bisection test, and Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) 24 hours before and after the three-week treatment to assess the severity of unilateral spatial neglect. Those tests were conducted by a therapist who was not involved in the treatment and did not know the state of the patients. However, CBS was filled out by guardians under the supervision of the therapist. In the line bisection test, the deviation between the point that a patient thought a center of the line and the actual center point was divided by a half of the line length and the mean was obtained by summing up the percentage figures. The mean figure tended to get large in patients with severe unilateral spatial neglect.18 Missing lines were excluded from the calculation. In the star cancellation test, the neglected stars on the left were counted; the figure got large in patients with severe neglect.19 CBS is a questionnaire. Guardians were allowed to fill out the questionnaire. The larger the score, the more severe the unilateral spatial neglect.20 The Korean version of modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) was used to assess the daily activity performance.
The collected data were statistically processed with SPSS 14.0 version, and the level of significance was set at p<0.05. General characteristics were analyzed with technical statistics to find out the level of detail items. A Wilcoxon Test was used to compare the severity of neglect for both groups before and after treatment, and a Mann-Whitney U Test was employed to compare differences in both groups before and after treatment.
Seven subjects in the control group and three subjects in the VR group accurately performed the line bisection test and were included in the analysis. All the patients conducted the other tests accurately. The two groups did not show any significant difference in the star cancellation test, line bisection test, CBS, and K-MBI before treatment. After rehabilitation treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in the star cancellation test, line bisection test, CBS, and K-MBI (p<0.05) (Table 2).
The VR group showed a higher increase in the star cancellation test and CBS scores after treatment than the control group (p<0.05), but both groups did not show any difference in the line bisection test and K-MBI before and after treatment (Table 3).
Virtual reality (VR) provides a realistic environment and is easy to control. It is also safe and cost-effective. Therefore, VR technology is more widely employed for medical purposes. In particular, it was reported that a wider application of the technology brought treatment effects to post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.21-23 It is also widely used in cognitive rehabilitation in the field of brain diseases.14 The application range of VR technology is extending to include activities of daily living and sports activities.24,25 However, it is still an early stage to apply VR therapy to unilateral spatial neglect patients.26 The scope of application for unilateral spatial neglect includes assessment and rehabilitation. Kim et al.12 demonstrated that unilateral spatial neglect could be effectively assessed using measurement of deviation degree and concentration span, utilizing a virtual reality program in which patients wearing head-mounted devices were instructed to find the center with cervical movements. Buxbaum et al.15 assessed unilateral spatial neglect by deviation degree when patients simulated driving a wheelchair in the virtual reality. Various rehabilitation therapies for unilateral spatial neglect are suggested, but there are few studies that compare these therapies to conventional rehabilitation programs. Additionally, few studies have examined the effectiveness of such treatments by comparison to a control group while conducting sustained treatment for a certain period of time. Castiello et al.16 reported the effect of VR application when they arranged patients to grab a real object placed right to the center and provided the re-arranged virtual reality where objects were placed left to the center. This study, however, was conducted only on six patients, and the treatment programs were applied three times for one day to compare results before and after treatment so it had its own limitations in proving sustained effects. Katz et al.27 reported that the control group showed greater improvements in conventional rehabilitation programs, virtual reality assessment, and actual street crossing than the VR group when the VR group underwent street crossing in the virtual reality and the control group performed visual tracking on a computer.
This study also observed the virtual reality program was more effective for unilateral spatial neglect than conventional rehabilitation programs through the three-week treatment. The assessments included the line bisection test, star cancellation test, and a CBS questionnaire. This study argued that the virtual reality program was very useful for assessing unilateral spatial neglect. However, the fact that the virtual reality group received training in VR and thus had experience with it when the control group had not suggests that the learning effect might have influenced the assessment. As such, the severity of neglect was not assessed with virtual reality in this study. As a result, no significant improvement in the line bisection test was observed. This seems to be attributed to the exclusion of patients who did not perform the test properly, meaning only a few patients were included in the assessment. Both the VR and control groups did not show significant improvement in activities of daily living, as other factors, such as motor performance of four limbs, cognition, and coordination work together for daily activities, not to mention unilateral spatial neglect.
This study had its own limitations. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the VR group or control group, and both groups showed no difference in initial studies. However, they had large standard deviations, so it might have worked to overwhelm a statistical difference in severity of initial neglect. The reason for greater improvement in the VR group is that the degree of improvement in the range with a wide standard deviation is greater than that in the range with narrow standard deviation. Thus, it could be that the difference in the improvement degree between two groups resulted from the difference in severity of unilateral spatial neglect. Therefore, future studies may require assessments for differences in severity of unilateral spatial neglect. In the case of CBS, guardians were allowed to fill in the questionnaire. Unlike other double-blind assessments, the guardians knew about the treatment of their patients, which means this study was not completely double-blind. Though the treatment programs were applied for three weeks and follow-up was not available, it was meaningful that the virtual reality therapy was suggested as one of the rehabilitation methods for unilateral spatial neglect even if many therapeutic methods were not proposed. Subtypes of unilateral spatial neglect were not assessed in this study, but it is presumed that the star cancellation test might bring about some improvement in not only the motor area but also the peripersonal area. It was difficult to identify an area in unilateral spatial neglect that was improved by virtual reality therapy because CBS included personal, extrapersonal, peripersonal, and motor areas. Future studies should extend the treatment period or the tracking/observation period and take subtypes of neglect into consideration.
The following hypotheses for the cause of unilateral spatial neglect have been suggested: 1) decreased attention and arousal on the contralesional side of space, 2) a damaged right hemisphere dominant attention-shift mechanism, and 3) a deficit in an internal representation of the contralesional side of space.17 Castiello and Glover et al.16,28 applied virtual reality therapy to improve remapping of space in the brain, capitalizing on the deficit in an internal representation of the contralesional side of space among the hypotheses and reported that only patients who had non-damaged inferior parietal and superior parietal lobes showed improvements with virtual reality therapy (remapping of space in the brain). It was subsequently presumed that this area played an important role in improving unilateral spatial neglect. In this study, improvement in decreased attention and arousal seemed to lead to improvement of neglect. Compared to conventional rehabilitation therapies, virtual reality therapy can easily stimulate interest and participation because it gives immediate feedback to incorrect responses in a three-dimensional space, which keeps patients in an arousal state for a prolonged time. Due to this advantage, virtual reality therapy was reported to be useful for improvement of attention in cognitive rehabilitation therapy. Such effects are thought to have positive influences on improvement of attention and arousal compared to conventional rehabilitation therapies.
Despite the importance of neglect influence on recovery of stroke and daily living activities, the reality is that few known effective therapies are currently in existence. Two of these, prism therapy and visual tracking, are known for their beneficial effects. Prism therapy has low compliance of patients because it is hard to apply. This study reported the effect of using the virtual reality program that stimulates the contralesional side of space. The therapy seems to be easily applied to patients who have decreased cognitive function after stroke or to gerontic patients because it can be easily understood and has no major treatment difficulties.
This study observed that the VR group showed a significant improvement in neglect compared to the control group when the virtual reality program was applied to patients with neglect caused by right hemisphere cerebral infarction. Thus, virtual reality therapy must be considered a potential rehabilitation program for patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
  • 1. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Chui HC. Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia 1980;18:123-132.
  • 2. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology 1998;50:1202-1207.
  • 3. Watson RT, Valenstein E, Heilman KM. Thalamic neglect. Possible role of the medial thalamus and nucleus reticularis in behavior. Arch Neurol 1981;38:501-506.
  • 4. Chen Sea MJ, Henderson A, Cermak SA. Patterns of visual spatial inattention and their functional significance in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:355-360.
  • 5. Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain 1982;105:543-552.
  • 6. van Nes IJ, van der Linden S, Hendricks HT, van Kuijk AA, Rulkens M, Verhagen WI, Geurts AC. Is visuospatial hemineglect really a determinant of postural control following stroke? An acute-phase study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:609-614.
  • 7. van Nes IJ, van Kessel ME, Schils F, Fasotti L, Geurts AC, Kwakkel G. Is visuospatial hemineglect longitudinally associated with postural imbalance in the postacute phase of stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:819-824.
  • 8. Tsirlin I, Dupierrix E, Chokron S, Coquillart S, Ohlmann T. Uses of virtual reality for diagnosis, rehabilitation and study of unilateral spatial neglect: review and analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:175-181.
  • 9. Luaute J, Halligan P, Rode G, Jacquin-Courtois S, Boisson D. Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect: a review. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006;24:409-418.
  • 10. Beis JM, Andre JM, Baumgarten A, Challier B. Eye patching in unilateral spatial neglect: efficacy of two methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:71-76.
  • 11. Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO, Keller I, Goldenberg G. Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:412-419.
  • 12. Kim DY, Lee JH, Park CI, Kim YW, Chang WH, Kim IY, Kim SI, Chon J, Chang HJ. Assessment of post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect using 3-dimensional virtual reality program. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2005;29:1-8.
  • 13. Klinger E, Bouchard S, Legeron P, Roy S, Lauer F, Chemin I, Nugues P. Virtual reality therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for social phobia: a preliminary controlled study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:76-88.
  • 14. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG. The status of virtual reality for the cognitive rehabilitation of persons with neurological disorders and acquired brain injury. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;39:22-33.
  • 15. Buxbaum LJ, Palermo MA, Mastrogiovanni D, Read MS, Rosenberg-Pitonyak E, Rizzo AA, Coslett HB. Assessment of spatial attention and neglect with a virtual wheelchair navigation task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30:650-660.
  • 16. Castiello U, Lusher D, Burton C, Glover S, Disler P. Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality. Neurology 2004;62:1958-1962.
  • 17. Pierce SR, Buxbaum LJ. Treatments of unilateral spatial neglect: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:256-268.
  • 18. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980;30:509-517.
  • 19. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 1989;2:908-911.
  • 20. Azouvi P, Olivier S, de Montety G, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, Tesio L. Behavioral assessment of unilateral spatial neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:51-57.
  • 21. Wallach HS, Bar-Zvi M. Virtual-reality-assisted treatment of flight phobia. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2007;44:29-32.
  • 22. Pollak Y, Weiss PL, Rizzo AA, Weizer M, Shriki L, Shalev RS, Gross-Tsur V. The utility of a continuous performance test embedded in virtual reality in measuring ADHD-related deficits. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2009;30:2-6.
  • 23. Difede J, Hoffman HG. Virtual reality exposure therapy for World Trade Center Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: a case report. Cyberpsychol Behav 2002;5:529-535.
  • 24. Lotan M, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL. Improving physical fitness of individuals with intellectual and developmental disability through a virtual reality intervention program. Res Dev Disabil 2009;30:229-239.
  • 25. Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:241-271.
  • 26. Koenig ST, Crucian GP, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Dunser A. Virtual reality rehabilitation of spatial abilities after brain damage. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;144:105-107.
  • 27. Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1235-1243.
  • 28. Glover S, Castiello U. Recovering space in unilateral spatial neglect: a neurological dissociation revealed by virtual reality. J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:833-843.
Fig. 1
(A) Virtual reality experimental set up (IREX system®, Vivid group, Toronto, Canada), (B) Bird-ball, (C) Coconut, (D) Conveyer.
arm-35-309-g001.jpg
Table 1
Baseline Characteristics of Subjects

VR: Virtual reality, K-MMSE: Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, MCA: Middle cerebral artery

*p<0.05

arm-35-309-i001.jpg
Table 2
Clinical Parameters before and after Treatment

VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

*p<0.05

arm-35-309-i002.jpg
Table 3
Comparison of Difference after 3 week Treatment in Each Group

VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

*p<0.05

arm-35-309-i003.jpg

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • The Neuropsychological Assessment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect Through Computerized and Virtual Reality Tools: A Scoping Review
      Stefano Terruzzi, Federica Albini, Gemma Massetti, Roberta Etzi, Alberto Gallace, Giuseppe Vallar
      Neuropsychology Review.2024; 34(2): 363.     CrossRef
    • Effect of stimulation-driven attention in virtual reality balloon search training of patients with left unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: A randomized crossover study
      Shinpei Osaki, Kazu Amimoto, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Junpei Tanabe, Nao Yoshihiro
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2024; 34(9): 1213.     CrossRef
    • An immersive virtual reality tool for assessing left and right unilateral spatial neglect
      Marine Thomasson, Daniel Perez‐Marcos, Sonia Crottaz‐Herbette, Fanny Brenet, Arnaud Saj, Thérèse Bernati, Andrea Serino, Tej Tadi, Olaf Blanke, Roberta Ronchi
      Journal of Neuropsychology.2024; 18(3): 349.     CrossRef
    • Advancements in brain-computer interfaces for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect: a concise review
      Alix Gouret, Solène Le Bars, Thibault Porssut, Florian Waszak, Sylvie Chokron
      Frontiers in Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effects of a Stimulus Response Task Using Virtual Reality on Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Randomized Controlled Trial
      Kazuya Motomura, Kazu Amimoto, Taku Numao, Fuminari Kaneko
      Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2024; 105(8): 1449.     CrossRef
    • Extended Reality in Revolutionizing Neurological Disease: A New Era for Chronic Condition Treatment
      Hariharan V , Malini Prithiva Kumari PK, Rajanandh MG
      Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • XR Technology for Higher Brain Dysfunction
      Naoki Wada
      The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 61(9): 807.     CrossRef
    • Visual Impairment in Stroke Patients: a Two-Part Review. Part II — Rehabilitation Methods
      Tatyana V. Marfina, Tatiana V. Konchugova, Tatiana V. Apkhanova, Detelina B. Kulchitskaya, Anastasiya A. Mukhina
      Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 23(6): 100.     CrossRef
    • Effects of virtual reality in the early-stage stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
      Jie Hao, Zixuan Yao, Kimberly Harp, Dr. Yeongjin Gwon, Zhen Chen, Ka-Chun Siu
      Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.2023; 39(12): 2569.     CrossRef
    • Virtual Reality in the Rehabilitation of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke
      Alexia Bourgeois, Armin Schnider, Francesco Turri, Radek Ptak
      Clinical and Translational Neuroscience.2023; 7(1): 3.     CrossRef
    • Negami: An Augmented Reality App for the Treatment of Spatial Neglect After Stroke
      Britta Stammler, Kathrin Flammer, Thomas Schuster, Marian Lambert, Hans-Otto Karnath
      JMIR Serious Games.2023; 11: e40651.     CrossRef
    • Feasibility of hemispatial neglect rehabilitation with virtual reality-based visual exploration therapy among patients with stroke: randomised controlled trial
      Joon-Ho Shin, Mingyu Kim, Ji-Yeong Lee, Mi-Young Kim, Yu-Jin Jeon, Kwanguk Kim
      Frontiers in Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of immersive, semi-immersive and non-immersive techniques
      Adriana Salatino, Claudio Zavattaro, Roberto Gammeri, Emanuele Cirillo, Maria Luisa Piatti, Maria Pyasik, Hilary Serra, Lorenzo Pia, Giuliano Geminiani, Raffaella Ricci
      Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2023; 152: 105248.     CrossRef
    • Cognitive Training With Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality in Neurorehabilitation: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
      Julian Specht, Barbara Stegmann, Hanna Gross, Karsten Krakow
      JMIR Serious Games.2023; 11: e45816.     CrossRef
    • An outlook of early rehabilitation of stroke patients using VR technologies
      Marina V. Petrova, Olga V. Ryzhova, Dmitrii V. Cheboksarov, Irina V. Saenko, Victoria S. Sueva, Sergey S. Petrikov
      Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation.2023; 5(2): 157.     CrossRef
    • Kurzfassung der S2k-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie von Neglect und anderen Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126)
      Hans-Otto Karnath, Thomas Schenk, Thomas Benke, Sabine Brinkmann, Doris Brötz, Anna Engel, Adrian Guggisberg, Helmut Hildebrandt, Georg Kerkhoff, Anuschka Rodenberg, Florian Schöberl, Claus-W. Wallesch
      Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie.2023; 34(3): 119.     CrossRef
    • Spatial Neglect Therapy With the Augmented Reality App “Negami” for Active Exploration Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial on 20 Stroke Patients With Spatial Neglect
      Britta Stammler, Kathrin Flammer, Thomas Schuster, Marian Lambert, Oliver Neumann, Michael Lux, Tamara Matuz, Hans-Otto Karnath
      Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(12): 1987.     CrossRef
    • Homonymous hemianopia and visual neglect: Part II ― rehabilitation
      Marina A. Shurupova, Alina D. Aizenshtein, Galina E. Ivanova
      Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation.2023; 5(3): 237.     CrossRef
    • Effects of a visual search task in a virtual reality space with a moving background on spatial cognition and standing balance in patients with left hemiparetic stroke
      Kazushige Iwakawa, Hiroka Ohshita, Naoya Nozaki, Motoyasu Takenaka, Yuki Ikeda, Fuminari Kaneko, Kazu Amimoto
      Neurocase.2023; 29(6): 167.     CrossRef
    • Using non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation for neglect and associated attentional deficits following stroke
      Elena Olgiati, Paresh A. Malhotra
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2022; 32(5): 735.     CrossRef
    • Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke
      Helen Morse, Laura Biggart, Valerie Pomeroy, Stéphanie Rossit
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2022; 32(5): 767.     CrossRef
    • Current trends in the treatment of patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: a scoping review
      Chuka Umeonwuka, Ronel Roos, Veronica Ntsiea
      Disability and Rehabilitation.2022; 44(11): 2158.     CrossRef
    • Comparing the effectiveness of bimanual and unimanual mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke: A pilot study
      Tae Yong Sim, Jae Sung Kwon
      NeuroRehabilitation.2022; 50(1): 133.     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality for the assessment and rehabilitation of neglect: where are we now? A 6-year review update
      S. Cavedoni, P. Cipresso, V. Mancuso, F. Bruni, E. Pedroli
      Virtual Reality.2022; 26(4): 1663.     CrossRef
    • Exploring the Potential of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect Due to Stroke: A Comprehensive Systematic Review
      Alex Martino Cinnera, Alessio Bisirri, Ilaria Chioccia, Enza Leone, Irene Ciancarelli, Marco Iosa, Giovanni Morone, Valeria Verna
      Brain Sciences.2022; 12(11): 1589.     CrossRef
    • Combined virtual reality and haptic robotics induce space and movement invariant sensorimotor adaptation
      Meytal Wilf, Mouna Cerra Cheraka, Max Jeanneret, Renaud Ott, Henri Perrin, Sonia Crottaz-Herbette, Andrea Serino
      Neuropsychologia.2021; 150: 107692.     CrossRef
    • Application of digital practice to improve head movement, visual perception and activities of daily living for subacute stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect
      Ho-Suk Choi, Won-Seob Shin, Dae-Hyouk Bang
      Medicine.2021; 100(6): e24637.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Prism Adaptation on Unilateral Neglect After Stroke
      Huaide Qiu, Jiayue Wang, Wenchao Yi, Zhifei Yin, Hongxing Wang, Jianan Li
      American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2021; 100(3): 259.     CrossRef
    • DYNAMIC OF UPPER LIMB SENSORIMOTOR RECOVERY ASSESSED ON THE FUGL-MEYER SCALE IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS WITH NEGLECT SYNDROME RECEIVING COMBINED PHYSICAL THERAPY AND ERGOTHERAPY
      Yurii M. Dido, Olena A. Dulo
      Wiadomości Lekarskie.2021; 74(4): 849.     CrossRef
    • Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury
      Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • May I Smell Your Attention: Exploration of Smell and Sound for Visuospatial Attention in Virtual Reality
      Nicolò Dozio, Emanuela Maggioni, Dario Pittera, Alberto Gallace, Marianna Obrist
      Frontiers in Psychology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Immersive 3D Virtual Reality Cancellation Task for Visual Neglect Assessment: A Pilot Study
      Samuel E. J. Knobel, Brigitte C. Kaufmann, Stephan M. Gerber, Dario Cazzoli, René M. Müri, Thomas Nyffeler, Tobias Nef
      Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality and its therapeutic uses in the elderly: A narrative clinical review
      Pragya Lodha, Avinash De Sousa, Sagar Karia
      Journal of Geriatric Mental Health.2020; 7(1): 21.     CrossRef
    • Development of a Diagnosis and Evaluation System for Hemiplegic Patients Post-Stroke Based on Motion Recognition Tracking and Analysis of Wrist Joint Kinematics
      Subok Kim, Seoho Park, Onseok Lee
      Sensors.2020; 20(16): 4548.     CrossRef
    • Alertness Training Improves Spatial Bias and Functional Ability in Spatial Neglect
      Thomas Van Vleet, Paolo Bonato, Eric Fabara, Sawsan Dabit, Sarah‐Jane Kim, Christopher Chiu, Antonio Luigi Bisogno, Michael Merzenich, Maurizio Corbetta, Joseph DeGutis
      Annals of Neurology.2020; 88(4): 747.     CrossRef
    • Kurzfassung der S1-Leitlinie „Rehabilitation bei Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126)
      Hans-Otto Karnath, Josef Zihl, Thomas Benke, Doris Brötz, Sabine Brinkmann, Helmut Hildebrandt, Georg Kerkhoff, Corina Kiesewalter, René Müri, Claus-W. Wallesch, Karl Wessel
      Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie.2020; 31(3): 129.     CrossRef
    • The effects of exergaming on pain, postural control, technology acceptance and flow experience in older people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomised controlled trial
      Jae-Llane Ditchburn, Paul van Schaik, John Dixon, Alasdair MacSween, Denis Martin
      BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A Survey on Digital Image Steganography and Steganalysis
      Mohammed Suliman Haji, Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim, Falah Y. H. Ahmed, Ghazali Bin Sulong
      Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience.2020; 17(7): 3256.     CrossRef
    • Assessment for Extrapersonal Neglect Using a Virtual Reality Task
      Masaki Tamura, Makoto Shirakawa, Zhi-wei Luo, Rumi Tanemura
      Higher Brain Function Research.2020; 40(3): 369.     CrossRef
    • Efficacy of home-based visuomotor feedback training in stroke patients with chronic hemispatial neglect
      Stéphanie Rossit, Christopher S. Y. Benwell, Larissa Szymanek, Gemma Learmonth, Laura McKernan-Ward, Elaine Corrigan, Keith Muir, Ian Reeves, George Duncan, Philip Birschel, Margaret Roberts, Katrina Livingstone, Hazel Jackson, Pauline Castle, Monika Harv
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2019; 29(2): 251.     CrossRef
    • Use of virtual reality in improving poststroke neglect: Promising neuropsychological and neurophysiological findings from a case study
      Rosaria De Luca, Viviana Lo Buono, Antonino Leo, Margherita Russo, Bianca Aragona, Simona Leonardi, Antonio Buda, Antonino Naro, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
      Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2019; 26(1): 96.     CrossRef
    • Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System
      Aušra Adomavičienė, Kristina Daunoravičienė, Raimondas Kubilius, Lina Varžaitytė, Juozas Raistenskis
      Medicina.2019; 55(4): 98.     CrossRef
    • Effects of a Mixed Reality-based Cognitive Training System Compared to a Conventional Computer-assisted Cognitive Training System on Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study
      Eunhee Park, Byoung-Ju Yun, Yu-Sun Min, Yang-Soo Lee, Sung-Jun Moon, Jae-Won Huh, Hyunsil Cha, Yongmin Chang, Tae-Du Jung
      Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology.2019; 32(3): 172.     CrossRef
    • Qualitative assessment for extrapersonal neglect in patients with stroke using a virtual reality system task
      Masaki Tamura, Makoto Shirakawa, Zhi-wei Luo, Kazue Noda, Rumi Tanemura, Omid Khaiyat
      Cogent Medicine.2019; 6(1): 1687272.     CrossRef
    • Novel Virtual Reality Application in Field of Neurorehabilitation
      Jeonghun Ku, Youn Joo Kang
      Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Efficacy of ICT-Based Neurocognitive Rehabilitation Programs for Acquired Brain Injury
      Andreia Geraldo, Artemisa R. Dores, Bárbara Coelho, Eduarda Ramião, Alexandre Castro-Caldas, Fernando Barbosa
      European Psychologist.2018; 23(3): 250.     CrossRef
    • Therapeutic Intervention for Visuo-Spatial Neglect after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
      Jae-Sung Kwon
      Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives.2018; 9(2): 59.     CrossRef
    • Differing effects of an immersive virtual reality programme on unilateral spatial neglect on activities of daily living
      Kazuhiro Yasuda, Daisuke Muroi, Mizuki Hirano, Kenta Saichi, Hiroyasu Iwata
      BMJ Case Reports.2018; 2018: bcr-2017-222860.     CrossRef
    • Validation of an immersive virtual reality system for training near and far space neglect in individuals with stroke: a pilot study
      Kazuhiro Yasuda, Daisuke Muroi, Masahiro Ohira, Hiroyasu Iwata
      Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2017; 24(7): 533.     CrossRef
    • Effects of virtual reality for stroke individuals based on the International Classification of Functioning and Health: a systematic review
      Gisele Carla dos Santos Palma, Tatiana Beline Freitas, Giordano Márcio Gatinho Bonuzzi, Marcos Antonio Arlindo Soares, Paulo Henrique Wong Leite, Natália Araújo Mazzini, Murilo Ruas Groschitz Almeida, José Eduardo Pompeu, Camila Torriani-Pasin
      Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2017; 24(4): 269.     CrossRef
    • Exergames Encouraging Exploration of Hemineglected Space in Stroke Patients With Visuospatial Neglect: A Feasibility Study
      Bernadette C Tobler-Ammann, Elif Surer, Eling D de Bruin, Marco Rabuffetti, N Alberto Borghese, Renato Mainetti, Michele Pirovano, Lia Wittwer, Ruud H Knols
      JMIR Serious Games.2017; 5(3): e17.     CrossRef
    • Pharmacological Treatment of Visuospatial Neglect: A Systematic Review
      Jet van der Kemp, Marit Dorresteijn, Antonia F. Ten Brink, Tanja C.W. Nijboer, Johanna M.A. Visser-Meily
      Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2017; 26(4): 686.     CrossRef
    • The ecological assessment of unilateral neglect
      Philippe Azouvi
      Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2017; 60(3): 186.     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation
      Kate E Laver, Belinda Lange, Stacey George, Judith E Deutsch, Gustavo Saposnik, Maria Crotty
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality treatment and assessments for post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic literature review
      Tatiana Ogourtsova, Wagner Souza Silva, Philippe S. Archambault, Anouk Lamontagne
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2017; 27(3): 409.     CrossRef
    • Leap Motion-based virtual reality training for improving motor functional recovery of upper limbs and neural reorganization in subacute stroke patients
      Zun-rong Wang, Ping Wang, Liang Xing, Li-ping Mei, Jun Zhao, Tong Zhang
      Neural Regeneration Research.2017; 12(11): 1823.     CrossRef
    • Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of cerebrovascular accidents
      Alaa S. Bou Ghannam, Prem S. Subramanian
      Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.2017; 28(6): 564.     CrossRef
    • Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients
      Ana Lúcia Faria, Andreia Andrade, Luísa Soares, Sergi Bermúdez i Badia
      Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • RehAtt – scanning training for neglect enhanced by multi-sensory stimulation in Virtual Reality
      Helena Fordell, Kenneth Bodin, Anders Eklund, Jan Malm
      Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2016; 23(3): 191.     CrossRef
    • Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
      Carolee J. Winstein, Joel Stein, Ross Arena, Barbara Bates, Leora R. Cherney, Steven C. Cramer, Frank Deruyter, Janice J. Eng, Beth Fisher, Richard L. Harvey, Catherine E. Lang, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Sue Pugh, Mathew J. Reeves, Lor
      Stroke.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation
      Kate E Laver, Stacey George, Susie Thomas, Judith E Deutsch, Maria Crotty
      Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Comparison of different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients
      Wei Yang, Tao-Tao Liu, Xiao-Bin Song, Yan Zhang, Zhao-Hui Li, Zhi-Hua Cui, Qian Hao, Hong Lei Liu, Chun Ling Lei, Jun Liu
      Journal of the Neurological Sciences.2015; 359(1-2): 219.     CrossRef
    • Stroke Rehabilitation Using Virtual Environments
      Michael J. Fu, Jayme S. Knutson, John Chae
      Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.2015; 26(4): 747.     CrossRef
    • Cognitive rehabilitation with right hemifield eye-patching for patients with sub-acute stroke and visuo-spatial neglect: A randomized controlled trial
      Celeste Aparicio-López, Alberto García-Molina, Juan García-Fernández, Raquel Lopez-Blazquez, Antonia Enseñat-Cantallops, Rocío Sánchez-Carrión, Vega Muriel, Jose María Tormos, Teresa Roig-Rovira
      Brain Injury.2015; 29(4): 501.     CrossRef
    • How and Why Affective and Reactive Virtual Agents Will Bring New Insights on Social Cognitive Disorders in Schizophrenia? An Illustration with a Virtual Card Game Paradigm
      Ali Oker, Elise Prigent, Matthieu Courgeon, Victoria Eyharabide, Mathieu Urbach, Nadine Bazin, Michel-Ange Amorim, Christine Passerieux, Jean-Claude Martin, Eric Brunet-Gouet
      Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Ward-based interventions for patients with hemispatial neglect in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic literature review
      Marianne E. Klinke, Thóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir, Haukur Hjaltason, Helga Jónsdóttir
      International Journal of Nursing Studies.2015; 52(8): 1375.     CrossRef
    • Assessment and rehabilitation of neglect using virtual reality: a systematic review
      Elisa Pedroli, Silvia Serino, Pietro Cipresso, Federica Pallavicini, Giuseppe Riva
      Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Use of Virtual Reality Tools for Vestibular Disorders Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Analysis
      Mathieu Bergeron, Catherine L. Lortie, Matthieu J. Guitton
      Advances in Medicine.2015; 2015: 1.     CrossRef
    • Reducing Chronic Visuo-Spatial Neglect Following Right Hemisphere Stroke Through Instrument Playing
      Rebeka Bodak, Paresh Malhotra, Nicolò F. Bernardi, Gianna Cocchini, Lauren Stewart
      Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The GestureTek virtual reality system in rehabilitation: a scoping review
      Stephanie M. N. Glegg, Sandy K. Tatla, Liisa Holsti
      Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.2014; 9(2): 89.     CrossRef
    • Factors Influencing Therapists' Adoption of Virtual Reality for Brain Injury Rehabilitation
      Stephanie M. N. Glegg, Liisa Holsti, Diana Velikonja, Barbara Ansley, Christine Brum, Denise Sartor
      Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.2013; 16(5): 385.     CrossRef
    • Validation of a low-cost virtual reality system for training street-crossing. A comparative study in healthy, neglected and non-neglected stroke individuals
      María-Dolores Navarro, Roberto Lloréns, Enrique Noé, Joan Ferri, Mariano Alcañiz
      Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2013; 23(4): 597.     CrossRef

    Download Citation

    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:

    Include:

    The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
    Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(3):309-315.   Published online June 30, 2011
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
    Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(3):309-315.   Published online June 30, 2011
    Close

    Figure

    • 0
    The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
    Image
    Fig. 1 (A) Virtual reality experimental set up (IREX system®, Vivid group, Toronto, Canada), (B) Bird-ball, (C) Coconut, (D) Conveyer.
    The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Stroke Patients

    Baseline Characteristics of Subjects

    VR: Virtual reality, K-MMSE: Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, MCA: Middle cerebral artery

    *p<0.05

    Clinical Parameters before and after Treatment

    VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

    *p<0.05

    Comparison of Difference after 3 week Treatment in Each Group

    VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

    *p<0.05

    Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Subjects

    VR: Virtual reality, K-MMSE: Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, MCA: Middle cerebral artery

    *p<0.05

    Table 2 Clinical Parameters before and after Treatment

    VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

    *p<0.05

    Table 3 Comparison of Difference after 3 week Treatment in Each Group

    VR: Virtual reality, CBS: Catherine Bergego scale, K-MBI: Korean version of modified Barthel index

    *p<0.05

    TOP