Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gangwon-do Rehabilitation Hospital, Chuncheon 200-853, Korea.
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 136-705, Korea.
2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SahmYook Medical Center, Seoul 130-711, Korea.
Corresponding author: Hee Kyu Kwon. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anam-dong 5ga, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, Korea. Tel: +82-2-920-6480, Fax: +82-2-920-9951, hkkwon@korea.ac.kr
• Received: July 23, 2011 • Accepted: October 8, 2011
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
To investigate the correlation of the ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio (WFR) and cross sectional area of median nerve at the wrist (CSA-W) to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Method
One hundred and ten wrists electrophysiologically graded as mild, moderate, and severe CTS and 38 healthy controls underwent ultrasonography of median nerve at the distal wrist crease and mid-forearm. WFR and CSA-W were analyzed according to the severity of CTS.
Results
WFR was 1.12±0.14, 1.91±0.33, 2.27±0.47 and 3.02±0.97 and the CSAs-W was 7.23±1.67 mm2, 13.51±3.72 mm2, 14.67±2.93 mm2, and 18.74±6.01 mm2 in controls, mild (n=28), moderate (n=46), and severe (n=36) CTS, respectively. CSA-W displayed significant differences between the control and the mild CTS, moderate CTS and severe CTS groups. However, there was no significant difference between mild CTS and moderate CTS groups. WFR revealed significant difference between all groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the WFR in grading the severity of CTS were higher than those of the CSA-W.
Conclusion
Ultrasonography is a useful complementary tool for the evaluation of CTS. Both WFR and CSA-W are highly correlated with severity grade of CTS. However, WFR is superior to CSA-W for diagnosis and grading of the severity of CTS.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment peripheral neuropathy, which can be diagnosed by history taking, physical examinations and electrodiagnosis. Electrodiagnosis is most valuable in the diagnosis of CTS and the evaluation of its severity,1 but is considered to be a bit invasive. On the other hand, high-resolution ultrasonography provides a simple, noninvasive means of visualizing peripheral nerves and the surrounding anatomic structures. In particular, it has been known to be useful in the evaluation of entrapment neuropathies such as CTS, and its use has increased.2-5
In the case of CTS patients, local swelling of the median nerve is observed proximal to the carpal tunnel.6 In this regard, many researchers have presented the cross sectional area of the median nerve, measured at the distal wrist (CSA-W), as an index for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of CTS.2,3,7 However, the values of the CSA-W have varied among reports, being 7-9.5 mm2 in the normal and 9-15 mm2 in patients with CTS.7,8 This variability might be due to a technical problem in the ultrasonographic measurement and the differences between populations studied. The cross sectional area (CSA) of a nerve may increase in proportion to body weight9,10 and also could be affected by certain diseases such as demyelinating hereditary motor sensory neuropathy, in which the CSA of the whole nerve increases.11 Therefore, the CSA-W could result in false positive diagnosis of CTS.12
A recent study reported that the CSA of normal median nerve was the same at the wrist and in the forearm.13 Based on this finding, a ratio between the median nerve area at the wrist and that in the forearm (WFR) is suggested as an alternative diagnostic index.14
It is crucial to classify the severities and neurophysiologic types of CTS, in treatment planning and follow-up. Many researchers have classified CTS severities with clinical patterns and electrophysiological findings.15-20 Recently, it was suggested that the CSA-W can be a useful index for ultrasonography-based classification of CTS severity.21 However, CSA-W have been measured only recently. The WFR is expected to be more helpful to classify CTS severities.
In this study, we compared WFR and CSA-W according to the electrophysiologic severity in patients with CTS and in healthy controls to evaluate whether WFR is useful in diagnosing and grading the severity of CTS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
This study was conducted on a group of patients having the clinical symptoms of CTS such as hand tingling, pain, burning sensation, dysesthesia, grip weakness and thenar atrophy in their 110 hands and meeting electrodiagnostic criteria, as well as on a control group composed of healthy people with their 38 hands. Patients with systemic peripheral neuropathies such as diabetic neuropathy, neuropathies other than CTS or radiculopathy were excluded. The study group was composed of 100 female hands and 10 male hands, and the control group was composed of 36 female hands and two male hands. The patients in the case group were classified into three subgroups as to CTS severity graded by electrodiagnosis (i.e., mild, moderate and severe groups; 28 hands, 46 hands and 36 hands, respectively) (Table 1). The average age of the case group was 53.18. The ages of subgroups averaged 56.29, 56.87 and 57.61 years, respectively. The subgroups did not show significant differences in age, sex ratio and the ratio of left hands to right hands (left-right ratio) (Table 1).
This study was conducted with the approval of the relevant institutional review board and the consent of patients.
Methods
Electrodiagnosis
Electrodiagnosis was performed by using a Counter Point MK2 machine (Dantek, Copenhagen, Denmark). The temperature of each hand was maintained at ≥32℃. The median motor response was recorded over the abductor pollicis brevis muscle with median nerve stimulation 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. The onset latency and baseline to peak amplitude were measured. The median sensory response was recorded antidromically with a bar electrode over the third digit and median nerve stimulation given at two points, 7 cm proximal to the recording electrode in the palm and 14 cm proximally at the wrist. To test the 5 cm transcarpal segment, the median nerve was stimulated at two points: the distal wrist crease and 5 cm distal to the distal wrist crease in the palm. The onset and peak latencies and baseline to peak amplitude were measured and the onset latency difference of 5 cm transcarpal segment was calculated. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. CTS severity was classified according to Steven's classification and in accordance with the criteria of the electrodiagnosis laboratory at Korea University Anam hospital (Table 2).19,22,23
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography was performed by use of M2540A Envisor Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging System (Philips, Bothell, USA). The transducer was always kept perpendicular to the median nerve to avert anisotropy. No additional force was applied other than the weight of the probe and the wrist was kept in the neutral position to avoid causing any artificial nerve deformity. The median nerve was imaged in an axial plane at the distal wrist crease and 12 cm proximal in the forearm (Fig. 1). CSA measurements were performed at the inner border of the thin hyperechoic epineural rim by the continuous tracing technique and the average values were calculated after serially measuring three times. WFR was calculated with the values of CSA measured at the distal wrist crease and 12 cm proximal in the forearm (Fig. 2).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS, version 18.0 (SPSS, Cary, USA). Data are reported as mean±standard deviations. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate differences in the ages, symptom durations and ultrasonographic values between the groups. The Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction was used as post-hoc test to analyze differences in the ultrasonographic values according to the electrodiagnostic severity grades. The chi-square test was used to assess the other basic characteristics of each groups. The Spearman correlation analysis was performed to examine the correlation between ultrasonographic values and electrodiagnostic severities. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Bonferroni correction was made for six comparisons; thus, the p-value for significance was <0.05/6=0.0083. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to detect optimal possible cut-off values of the ultrasonographic data according to electrodiagnostic severities, and specificity and sensitivity were obtained.
RESULTS
On the correlation analysis between ultrasonographic values and electrodiagnostic severities, significant correlations were observed in the CSA-W (r=0.728) as well as in the WFR (r=0.808). WFR showed a higher correlation (Table 3). The CSA-W had the value of 7.23 mm2, 13.51 mm2, 14.61 mm2 and 18.74 mm2 in the control group, mild group, moderate group and severe group, respectively, showing significant differences. CSA of the median nerve, measured at 12 cm proximal to the wrist crease, was 6.88 mm2, 7.14 mm2, 6.57 mm2 and 6.39 mm2 in the control group, mild group, moderate group and severe group, respectively, showing no significant differences. The wrist-forearm ratio was 1.12, 1.91, 2.27 and 3.02 in the four groups (same respective order) and showed significant differences (Table 4).
Post-hoc analysis using Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction showed that in relation to the CSA-W, there were significant differences between the control group and the mild group, and between the moderate group and the severe group. However, there was no significant difference between the mild group and the moderate group. With WFR, there were significant differences between the control group and the mild group, between the mild group and the moderate group and between the moderate group and the severe group (Table 4).
The ultrasonographic cut-off values for the diagnosis of CTS were obtained by use of the ROC curve. Likewise, the cut-off values, suitable for the diagnosis of moderate to severe and severe CTS, were obtained in the same way (Fig. 3). The areas under the ROC curve of the CSA-W in diagnosis of CTS, moderate to severe CTS and severe CTS were 0.988, 0.862 and 0.804, respectively (p<0.05). In the case of WFR, the values were 0.999, 0.912 and 0.859, respectively (p<0.05); thus, the areas under the ROC curve showed higher values in the latter. The cut-off value of the CSA-W, obtained by the ROC curve, indicated 9.5 mm2, 12.05 mm2 and 14.15 mm2 in diagnosis of CTS, moderate to severe CTS and severe CTS, respectively. Meanwhile, the cut-off value of the WFR indicated 1.34, 1.89 and 2.2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off value was superior in the WFR (Table 5).
DISCUSSION
CTS is usually diagnosed by clinical evaluation and electrodiagnosis, and the therapeutic plan is decided on its severity. In this regard, various scales have been developed. In recent times, ultrasonography emerged as a promising diagnostic tool for entrapment neuropathies, particularly CTS. In the case of CTS, local swelling of the median nerve is observed at the proximal carpal tunnel on ultrasonography, and CSA-W is useful to diagnose CTS and is highly correlated with clinical symptoms.24,25 However, the CSA-W may vary depending upon the measurer or depending upon whether the epineurium is included in the measurement. Several studies reported that body weight correlates with CSA-W.9,10 In this connection, it has been suggested that WFR could be a new index for the diagnosis of CTS.14
Grading the severity of CTS is important in treatment planning and in follow-up. Some researchers have studied the correlation of ultrasonographic findings and CTS severities. Lee et al.26 reported that the swelling of the median nerve at the proximal carpal tunnel was related to the results of nerve conduction study. Bayrak et al.27 reported that the motor unit number estimation of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle was negatively correlated with CSA of the median nerve at the proximal and middle segment of carpal tunnel. Padua et al.28 reported that a positive correlation exists between CSA-W and the neurophysiological severity of CTS. In this connection, El Miedany et al. analyzed the correlation between electrodiagnostic severity and the CSA-W and suggested cut-off points that discriminate between different grades of CTS severity as 10.0-13.0 mm2 for mild patients, 13.0-15.0 mm2 for moderate patients and >15.0 mm2 for severe patients.21 However, the false positive rate is more likely to increase if CTS is diagnosed only by the CSA-W.
In this study, we compared electrodiagnostic CTS severities and ultrasonographic values. CSA-W increased according to CTS severity. However, mild CTS and moderate CTS did not show significant differences in CSA-W. WFR was more highly related to CTS severity than CSA-W, and significant differences were observed between all groups. The sensitivity and specificity, obtained by the ROC curve, were superior in WFR.
In common with this study, some previous studies reported increased CSA-W according to CTS severity.21,26-28 However, Asians are different from Westerners in CSA-W12,29 and also the values may vary depending upon the measurer. Moreover, there has been controversy about the correlation between body weight and CSA-W.9,10 WFR may be advantageous to grade severity of CTS, inasmuch as it is possible to reduce the differences amongst researchers14 and to correct the differences caused by somatotype or race.
Due to the absence of somatotype information, this study could not analyze the correlation between body weight or height and CSA-W. Moreover, patients' clinical symptoms could not be reflected in the classification of CTS severities. In addition, the control group and the patient groups were composed of comparatively small numbers. Furthermore, the results were obtained on the basis of nonparametric statistics because data could not meet the normality. As a result, in the CSA-W and WFR determinations, the standard deviation increased in proportion to the CTS severity, and, thus, sensitivity and specificity became relatively lower. Alternatively, it might have been because electrophysiological severities were not consistent with anatomical findings. Large-scale studies are required.
CONCLUSION
In addition to clinical symptoms and electrodiagnosis, ultrasonography may be complementary to the diagnosis of CTS and the classification of its severities. In this study, CSA-W increased in proportion to the severity of CTS. However, WFR displayed statistical significance in relation to the assessment of each severity. Moreover, the cut-off value of each severity showed higher sensitivity and specificity. Altogether, WFR is amore accurate index than CSA-W.
REFERENCES
1. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Qartly CA, Vennix MJ, Wilson JR. Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2002;58:1589-1592.
5. Yoon JS, Walker FO, Cartwright MS. Ultrasonographic swelling ratio in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve 2008;38:1231-1235.
6. Tuncali D, Barutcu AY, Terzioglu A, Aslan G. Carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of intraoperative structural changes with clinical and electrodiagnostic severity. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58:1136-1142.
7. Hammer HB, Hovden IA, Haavardsholm EA, Kvien TK. Ultrasonography shows increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:584-588.
9. Peeters EY, Nieboer KH, Osteaux MM. Sonography of the normal ulnar nerve at Guyon's canal and of the common peroneal nerve dorsal to the fibular head. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:375-380.
10. Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Passmore LV, Walker FO. Ultrasonographic findings of the normal ulnar nerve in adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:394-396.
11. Martinoli C, Schenone A, Bianchi S, Mandich P, Caponetto C, Abbruzzese M, Derchi LE. Sonography of the median nerve in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1553-1556.
12. Cho JM, Yoon JS, Kim SJ, Park BK, Lee GH, Jeong JS. Feasibility of ultrasonographic area ratio of median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in Korea. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2009;33:627-631.
13. Cartwright MS, Shin HW, Walker FO. Ultrasonographic characteristics of the normal median nerve. Neurology 2006;66(Suppl 2):A83.
14. Hobson-Webb LD, Massey JM, Juel VC, Sanders DB. The ultrasonographic wrist-to-forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:1353-1357.
15. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Guidelines in electrodiagnostic medicine. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999;8:S141-S167.
17. Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M, Padua R, Gregori B, D'Amico P, Padua L. A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome: validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:71-77.
18. Padua L. A new approach to carpal tunnel syndrome: multicenter studies with multiperspective assessment. AAEM Course H 2003;2003 Sep 16-20; San Francisco, USA. Rochester, American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine.
19. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph #26: the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:1477-1486.
20. Wee AS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a system for categorizing and grading electrophysiologic abnormalities. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2001;41:281-288.
21. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:887-895.
22. Lee HJ, Kwon HK. Electrophysiologic classification of severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korean Assoc EMG-Electrodiagn Med 2004;6:1-3.
23. Cho YS, Lee SH, Kwon HK, Lee HJ. Reappraisal of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1998;22:861-865.
24. Kotevoglu N, Gulbahce-Saglam S. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and its relevance to clinical evaluation. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72:142-145.
26. Lee CH, Kim TK, Yoon ES, Dhong ES. Correlation of high-resolution ultrasonographic findings with the clinical symptoms and electrodiagnostic data in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:20-23.
27. Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Tilki HE, Nural MS, Sunter T. Ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison with electrophysiological stage and motor unit number estimate. Muscle Nerve 2007;35:344-348.
29. Park JY, Park SR, Lee SH, Choi KH. The ultrasonographic findings of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel according to age and sex of normal Korean adults. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2008;32:564-569.
Fig. 1
Placement of ultrasonographic probe at the forearm. Ultrasonographic transverse scan was done at two different levels. The cross sectional areas of median nerve were measured at the distal wrist crease (A) and 12 cm proximal to this level (B). A/B ratio was obtained.
Fig. 2
Median nerve images. The nerve is identified by its location and characteristic stippled appearance. DWC: Distal wrist crease.
Fig. 3
A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve showing the relationship between sensitivity and specificity for each ultrasonographic parameter in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (A), moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome (B), and severe carpal tunnel syndrome (C). CSA: Cross sectional area, WFR: Wrist-to-forearm ratio.
*Median nerve sensory conduction study with Ill digit recording recording and antidromic stimulation, †Median nerve motor conduction study with abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle recording and 8 cm proximal stimulation at wrist, ‡Motor CTS: Abnormal nerve conduction limited to only distal median motor nerve (wrist stimulation-APB recording)
Table 3
Spearman's Correlation Coeffiency of the Ultrasonographic Measurements and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
*p<0.05, †Significant difference from control group (p<0.0083), ‡Significant difference from mild CTS group (p<0.0083), §Significant difference from moderate CTS group (p<0.0083), ∥Significant difference from severe CTS group (p<0.0083)
Table 5
Sensitivity and Specificity of Optimal Cut-Off Values that Discriminate the Different Grades of CTS Severity as Detected by Ultrasonography
Ultrasonographic Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area and Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Laboratory Biomarkers in Electrodiagnostically Confirmed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Single-Center Correlational Study Hasan Kara, Hüseyin Kaplan, Fatma Nur Aba, Servin Karaca, İsa Cüce Diagnostics.2025; 15(18): 2407. CrossRef
Neuroanatomical changes in the median nerve following surgical release in moderate-to-severe carpal tunnel syndrome. José Antonio Expósito-Tirado, José María Delgado-Mendilivar, Jorge Angulo-Gutiérrez, Martí Peirau-Gabarrell, Juana Díaz-del-Río, Julio Salvador-Camacho, María del Carmen García-Serrano, Rogelio Del-Pino-Algarrada, Juan Manuel Praena-Fernández, Gloria Patr Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnostic efficacy of high-frequency Grey-scale ultrasonography and Sono-elastography in grading the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome in comparison to nerve conduction studies Arjun Prakash, H. Vinutha, D. C. Janardhan, R. Mohit Mouna, P. S. Sushmitha, Shantkumar Sajjan, H. Samanvitha Skeletal Radiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing the efficacy of multiple quantitative and qualitative ultrasound parameters for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome Isha Gupta, Shashank Sharma, Kshitij Gupta, Meenu Bagarhatta, Naima Mannan, Parul Gupta, Vikas Jhanwar, Deepak Gupta, Jitendra Yadav Journal of Ultrasound.2024; 28(1): 43. CrossRef
Multiparametric Ultrasound Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Beyond Nerve Cross-sectional Area Tjaša Tomažin, Luka Pušnik, Domenico Albano, Suren Armeni Jengojan, Žiga Snoj Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.2024; 28(06): 661. CrossRef
Ultrasound Measurements of the Median Nerve at the Distal Wrist Crease Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Studies Nicholas F. Aloi, Landon M. Cluts, John R. Fowler HAND.2023; 18(5): 765. CrossRef
The cross-sectional morphology of median nerve in carpal tunnel of healthy, adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis A. Asghar, S. Naaz, S. Ansari, A. Kumar, V. Singh Morphologie.2023; 107(356): 99. CrossRef
Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve and wrist skin thickness in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: relationship with clinical, electrophysiologic and functionality C UZ, E UMAY Acta Orthopaedica Belgica.2023; 89(1): 167. CrossRef
Sonographic evaluation of median nerve cross‐sectional area in a normal Iranian population: A cross‐sectional study Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Masume Bayat Health Science Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
3D volumetric evaluation of the diagnosis and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome using MRI Erol Öten, Levent Uğur Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2022; 97: 82. CrossRef
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Sonographic Features before and after Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Association with Clinical Findings Mahla Daliri, Motahareh Ebrahimnejad, Samane Najafi, Behzad Aminzadeh, Maryam Emadzadeh, Ehsan Moradi, Ali Moradi Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2022; 14(4): 603. CrossRef
How to Differentiate Pronator Syndrome from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical Comparison Adrian Andrzej Balcerzak, Kacper Ruzik, Richard Shane Tubbs, Marko Konschake, Michał Podgórski, Andrzej Borowski, Marek Drobniewski, Łukasz Olewnik Diagnostics.2022; 12(10): 2433. CrossRef
Reduction in median nerve cross-sectional area at the forearm correlates with axon loss in carpal tunnel syndrome Lauri Martikkala, Katri Mäkelä, Sari-Leena Himanen Clinical Neurophysiology Practice.2021; 6: 209. CrossRef
High-resolution neuromuscular ultrasound-based diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in a sample of Egyptian population Ahmed ElSadek, Mai Fathy, Amr AbdElMoneim The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of Sonographic Measurement by Anatomical Area in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Correlation the Measurement with Electrodiagnostic Study JungWoo Park Archives of Hand and Microsurgery.2020; 25(1): 8. CrossRef
Ultrasound parameters to identify and diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. A review of the literature Callum Linehan, Jessie Childs, Ann E. Quinton, Aamer Aziz Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2020; 23(3): 194. CrossRef
Change to movement and morphology of the median nerve resulting from steroid injection in patients with mild carpal tunnel syndrome Hyunseok Moon, Byung Joo Lee, Donghwi Park Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity Peyman Roomizadeh, Bina Eftekharsadat, Amin Abedini, Sepideh Ranjbar-kiyakalayeh, Naseh Yousefi, Safoora Ebadi, Arash Babaei-Ghazani American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2019; 98(5): 373. CrossRef
Role of Ultrasonography in Severe Distal Median Nerve Neuropathy Vasudeva Iyer Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2019; 36(4): 312. CrossRef
Median Nerve Ultrasonography Measurements Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity Beverlie L. Ting, Philip E. Blazar, Jamie E. Collins, Ariana N. Mora, Mohammad Kian Salajegheh, Anthony A. Amato, Brandon E. Earp Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2019; 27(1): e17. CrossRef
Accuracy of Ultrasonography for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ana Torres-Costoso, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Asunción Ferri-Morales, Iván Cavero-Redondo Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2018; 99(4): 758. CrossRef
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment With Ultrasonography: A Comparison Between Non-diabetic and Diabetic Patients Chung Ho Lee, Hanboram Choi, Joon Shik Yoon, Seok Kang Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(1): 85. CrossRef
Carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with and without diabetes mellitus in Upper Egypt: The impact of electrophysiological and ultrasonographical studies Abeer A. Tony, Effat A.E. Tony, Yasser A.R.M. Selim, Ehab Saad Alexandria Journal of Medicine.2018; 54(4): 437. CrossRef
Síndrome del túnel carpiano en 4 embarazadas. Controversia entre electrofisiología y ecografía J.M. Pardal-Fernández, T. Segura Rehabilitación.2018; 52(3): 206. CrossRef
The efficiency of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in the diagnosis and staging of carpal tunnel syndrome Harun Arslan, Alpaslan Yavuz, Ferda İlgen, Abdurrahman Aycan, Mesut Ozgokce, Hüseyin Akdeniz, Abdussamet Batur Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2018; 45(3): 453. CrossRef
Ultrasonography Predictive Factors of Response to Local Steroid Injection in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Farnaz Dehghan, Shila Haghighat, Hadiseh Ramezanian, Mehdi Karami, Mohammad Reza Rezaei Advanced Biomedical Research.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
The Acupuncture Effect on Median Nerve Morphology in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Ultrasonographic Study Fatma Gülçin Ural, Gökhan Tuna Öztürk, Jeng-Ren Duann Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Ultrasonography of the Transverse Movement and Deformation of the Median Nerve and Its Relationships With Electrophysiological Severity in the Early Stages of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Donghwi Park PM&R.2017; 9(11): 1085. CrossRef
Morphologic change of nerve and symptom relief are similar after mini-incision and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial Won-Taek Oh, Ho-Jung Kang, Il-Hyun Koh, Jin-Young Jang, Yun-Rak Choi BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Median Nerve Cross-sectional Area on 3-T MRI in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Mikinori Ikeda, Mitsuhiro Okada, Masahiko Toyama, Takuya Uemura, Kiyohito Takamatsu, Hiroaki Nakamura Orthopedics.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Sonography of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome According to Pathophysiologic Type: Conduction Block Versus Axonal Degeneration Hyun Im Moon, Hee Kyu Kwon, Ahry Lee, Se Kwang Lee, Sung-Bom Pyun Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2017; 36(5): 993. CrossRef
Diagnostic Cutoff Value for Ultrasonography of the Common Fibular Neuropathy at the Fibular Head Ji Yeon Kim, Seojin Song, Hye Jung Park, Won Ihl Rhee, Sun Jae Won Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 40(6): 1057. CrossRef
Diagnostic Significance of Ultrasonographic Measurements and Median-Ulnar Ratio in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Correlation with Nerve Conduction Studies Ozan Volkan Yurdakul, Nilgün Mesci, Yilmaz Çetinkaya, Duygu Geler Külcü Journal of Clinical Neurology.2016; 12(3): 289. CrossRef
Utility of Ultrasonography of the Median Nerve With a High‐Frequency Probe for the Diagnosis of Dialysis‐Related Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Tadashi Yamazaki, Naomi Kawahara, Kazunori Arai, Koji Oyoshi, Masami Oshima, Sachiko Koike, Akiko Miyauchi, Tokie Hayasaka, Tetsuo Saito, Shuichi Tsuruoka Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis.2016; 20(5): 483. CrossRef
Electrosonodiagnosis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm Based on an Analytic Literature Review Gary Goldberg, Jeffrey M. Zeckser, Revati Mummaneni, Jason D. Tucker PM&R.2016; 8(5): 463. CrossRef
Grey-scale sonography and sonoelastography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome Hideaki Miyamoto, Yutaka Morizaki, Takahiro Kashiyama, Sakae Tanaka World Journal of Radiology.2016; 8(3): 281. CrossRef
Future of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Mohamed M. H. Abd ellah, John O. Bamidele, P. Debbage, M. Taljanovic, Werner Jaschke, Andrea S. Klauser Current Radiology Reports.2015;[Epub] CrossRef
Sonographic Findings in the Ulnar Nerve According to the Electrophysiologic Stage of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Young In Eom, Moon Hee Choi, Yue Kyung Kim, In Soo Joo Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2015; 34(6): 1027. CrossRef
Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies? Andrea S. Klauser, Mohamed M. H. Abd Ellah, Ethan J. Halpern, Christian Siedentopf, Thomas Auer, Gernot Eberle, Rosa Bellmann-Weiler, Christian Kremser, Martin Sojer, Wolfgang N. Löscher, Markus F. Gabl, Gudrun M. Feuchtner, Werner R. Jaschke European Radiology.2015; 25(8): 2419. CrossRef
Estudo comparativo entre o exame físico, a eletroneuromiografia e a ultrassonografia no diagnóstico da síndrome do túnel do carpo Arnaldo Gonçalves de Jesus Filho, Bruno Fajardo do Nascimento, Marcelo de Carvalho Amorim, Ronald Alan Sauaia Naus, Elmano de Araújo Loures, Lucas Moratelli Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia.2014; 49(5): 446. CrossRef
Nerve ultrasound in diabetic polyneuropathy: The new frontier? Steve Vucic Clinical Neurophysiology.2014; 125(4): 657. CrossRef
The Diagnostic and Grading Value of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Haci Taner Bulut, Adem Yildirim, Burcu Ekmekci, Hediye Pinar Gunbey Academic Radiology.2014; 21(6): 767. CrossRef
Ultrasonography of palm to elbow segment of median nerve in different degrees of diabetic polyneuropathy Hyun Im Moon, Hee Kyu Kwon, Lina Kim, Hye Jin Lee, Hang Jae Lee Clinical Neurophysiology.2014; 125(4): 844. CrossRef
Median nerve stiffness measurement by shear wave elastography: a potential sonographic method in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome Fatih Kantarci, Fethi Emre Ustabasioglu, Sakir Delil, Deniz Cebi Olgun, Bora Korkmazer, Atilla Suleyman Dikici, Onur Tutar, Mecbure Nalbantoglu, Nurten Uzun, Ismail Mihmanli European Radiology.2014; 24(2): 434. CrossRef
Use of diffusion tensor imaging for nonsurgical treatments of carpal tunnel syndrome Adem Yildirim, Haci Taner Bulut, Burcu Ekmekci, Gülseren Dost Surucu, Mehmet Karabiber Muscle & Nerve.2014; 50(6): 950. CrossRef
No correlation between sonographic and electrophysiological parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome A. Żyluk, I. Walaszek, Z. Szlosser Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume).2014; 39(2): 161. CrossRef
Comparative study between physical examination, electroneuromyography and ultrasonography in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome Arnaldo Gonçalves de Jesus Filho, Bruno Fajardo do Nascimento, Marcelo de Carvalho Amorim, Ronald Alan Sauaia Naus, Elmano de Araújo Loures, Lucas Moratelli Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition).2014; 49(5): 446. CrossRef
MEDIAN NERVE DEFORMATION DURING FINGER MOTION IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: CORRELATION BETWEEN NERVE CONDUCTION AND ULTRASONOGRAPHIC INDICES Yuichi Yoshii, Tomoo Ishii, Shinsuke Sakai Hand Surgery.2013; 18(02): 203. CrossRef
Correlating ultrasound findings of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve conduction studies Jae Min Kim, Min Wook Kim, Young Jin Ko Muscle & Nerve.2013; 48(6): 905. CrossRef
Ultrasonographic Findings of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome after Local Steroid Injection: A Preliminary Study 한은영, 임상희, 김용균, 김진석, 이상철 Jouranl of Korean Association of EMG Electrodiagnostic Medicine.2012; 14(2): 80. CrossRef
Ultrasonography of Median Nerve and Electrophysiologic Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Fig. 1 Placement of ultrasonographic probe at the forearm. Ultrasonographic transverse scan was done at two different levels. The cross sectional areas of median nerve were measured at the distal wrist crease (A) and 12 cm proximal to this level (B). A/B ratio was obtained.
Fig. 2 Median nerve images. The nerve is identified by its location and characteristic stippled appearance. DWC: Distal wrist crease.
Fig. 3 A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve showing the relationship between sensitivity and specificity for each ultrasonographic parameter in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (A), moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome (B), and severe carpal tunnel syndrome (C). CSA: Cross sectional area, WFR: Wrist-to-forearm ratio.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Ultrasonography of Median Nerve and Electrophysiologic Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
*Median nerve sensory conduction study with Ill digit recording recording and antidromic stimulation, †Median nerve motor conduction study with abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle recording and 8 cm proximal stimulation at wrist, ‡Motor CTS: Abnormal nerve conduction limited to only distal median motor nerve (wrist stimulation-APB recording)
Spearman's Correlation Coeffiency of the Ultrasonographic Measurements and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
*p<0.05, †Significant difference from control group (p<0.0083), ‡Significant difference from mild CTS group (p<0.0083), §Significant difference from moderate CTS group (p<0.0083), ∥Significant difference from severe CTS group (p<0.0083)
Sensitivity and Specificity of Optimal Cut-Off Values that Discriminate the Different Grades of CTS Severity as Detected by Ultrasonography
*Median nerve sensory conduction study with Ill digit recording recording and antidromic stimulation, †Median nerve motor conduction study with abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle recording and 8 cm proximal stimulation at wrist, ‡Motor CTS: Abnormal nerve conduction limited to only distal median motor nerve (wrist stimulation-APB recording)
Table 3 Spearman's Correlation Coeffiency of the Ultrasonographic Measurements and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
*p<0.05, †Significant difference from control group (p<0.0083), ‡Significant difference from mild CTS group (p<0.0083), §Significant difference from moderate CTS group (p<0.0083), ∥Significant difference from severe CTS group (p<0.0083)
Table 5 Sensitivity and Specificity of Optimal Cut-Off Values that Discriminate the Different Grades of CTS Severity as Detected by Ultrasonography
