• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

2
results for

"Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)"

Original Articles
Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
Ka Ying Doris Miu, Ching Kok, Sau Shan Leung, Elaine Y. L. Chan, Elaine Wong
Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(6):428-437.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20093
Objective
To compare the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on upper limb function recovery among patients who recently had stroke.
Methods
Subjects with recent stroke (within 1 month) were randomized to rTMS (n=25) and tDCS (n=26) applied over the non-lesioned hemisphere for three sessions per week, followed by tailored upper limb rehabilitation training for a total of 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer arm score test, Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), hand grip strength, and modified Barthel Index at weeks 2 and 4. Both therapists responsible for training and assessment were blinded to the intervention allocated.
Results
There was an improvement in all the motor performance scales among both groups (p<0.001). These improvements persisted at discharge. However, there was no significant difference in any of the assessment scales between the two groups. The rTMS group showed a statistically non-significant greater improvement in MAS, 9HPT, and handgrip strength than the tDCS group.
Conclusion
Both interventions produce a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function. There was no statistically significant difference between the two intervention methods with respect to motor performance. It is suggested that a larger study may help to clarify the superiority of either methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation
    Ayesha Juhi, Manul Das, Dinesh Bhatia, Suman Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shreya Sharma, Pritam Kumar Chaudhary, Chanchal Goyal, Md Asif Khan, Himel Mondal
    MethodsX.2025; 14: 103209.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy of different protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function, activities of daily living, and neurological function in patients with early stroke: a systema
    Xueyi Ni, Zinan Yuan, Ruimou Xie, Xiaoxue Zhai, Xiang Cheng, Yu Pan
    Neurological Sciences.2025; 46(6): 2479.     CrossRef
  • A Multi-Electrode Transcranial Direct Current Stimulator (ME-tDCS): Design considerations and safety aspects
    Cassandra Solomons, Vivekanandan Shanmugasundaram, Sivasakthi Murugan Velayutham
    Heliyon.2025; 11(7): e43039.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation for functional recovery in animal models of stroke: A systematic review
    Antonio Rodríguez, Laura Amaya-Pascasio, María Gutiérrez-Fernández, José García-Pinteño, Margarita Moreno, Patricia Martínez-Sánchez
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2024; 156: 105485.     CrossRef
  • The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Benedetta Capetti, Lorenzo Conti, Chiara Marzorati, Roberto Grasso, Roberta Ferrucci, Gabriella Pravettoni, J. Michael Wyss
    Neural Plasticity.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gamma oscillations induced by 40-Hz visual-auditory stimulation for the treatment of acute-phase limb motor rehabilitation after stroke: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Wang Fu, Xiaoming Yu, Minghui Lai, Yuanli Li, Yingting Yang, Yong Qin, Min Yu, Feng Wang, Cong Wang
    Trials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Changes in the Ischemic Brain as Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Targets—TMS and tDCS Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Combination Therapies
    Aleksandra Markowska, Beata Tarnacka
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(7): 1560.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coupled With Visual‐Feedback Cycling Exercise Improves Walking Ability and Walking Stability After Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Study
    Yixiu Wang, Xiaoming Chen, Menghuan Wang, Yingying Pan, Shiyi Li, Mengfei He, Feng Lin, Zhongli Jiang, Zhiyong Zhao
    Neural Plasticity.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cancer Pain Management in Nonbrain Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis
    Yung-Jiun Chien, Chun-Yu Chang, Meng-Yu Wu, Yung-Chen Chien, Hsin-Chi Wu, Yi-Shiung Horng, Saskia F. A. Duijts
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Relieving Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Ji-Soo Baik, Jung-Hyun Yang, Sung-Hwa Ko, So-Jung Lee, Yong-Il Shin
    Life.2023; 13(5): 1172.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Lower Limb Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation
    Qian Duan, Wenying Liu, Jinhui Yang, Ben Huang, Jie Shen, Laura Baroncelli
    Neural Plasticity.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation
    Filip Stefanovic, Julian A. Martinez, Ghazala T. Saleem, Sue Ann Sisto, Michael T. Miller, Yaa A. Achampong, Albert H. Titus
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function and Performance in Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Ishtiaq Ahmed, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Simone Rossi, Fatih A. Cavdar, Seth Kwame Agyenkwa, Marco Y.C. Pang, Sofia Straudi
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(10): 1683.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled tria
    Hee-Mun Cho, Seungwoo Cha, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Qingqing Zhao, Hong Li, Yu Liu, Haonan Mei, Liying Guo, Xianying Liu, Xiaolin Tao, Jiang Ma
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial-Direct-Current-Stimulation Accelerates Motor Recovery After Cortical Infarction in Mice: The Interplay of Structural Cellular Responses and Functional Recovery
    Helene Luise Walter, Anton Pikhovych, Heike Endepols, Steffen Rotthues, Johannes Bärmann, Heiko Backes, Mathias Hoehn, Dirk Wiedermann, Bernd Neumaier, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Maria Adele Rueger, Michael Schroeter
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2022; 36(10-11): 701.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neurostimulations for Upper Extremity Function Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Tao Xue, Zeya Yan, Jiahao Meng, Wei Wang, Shujun Chen, Xin Wu, Feng Gu, Xinyu Tao, Wenxue Wu, Zhouqing Chen, Yutong Bai, Zhong Wang, Jianguo Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(20): 6162.     CrossRef
  • 5,899 View
  • 200 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
Eunhee Park, Yun-Hee Kim, Won Hyuk Chang, Tae Gun Kwon, Yong-Il Shin
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(3):297-303.   Published online June 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297
Objective

To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation.

Results

Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation.

Conclusion

Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression
    Dongsheng Zhou, Xingxing Li, Shuochi Wei, Chang Yu, Dongmei Wang, Yuchen Li, Jiaxin Li, Junyao Liu, Shen Li, Wenhao Zhuang, Yanli Li, Ruichenxi Luo, Zhiwang Liu, Jimeng Liu, Yongming Xu, Jialin Fan, Guidong Zhu, Weiqian Xu, Yiping Tang, Raymond Y. Cho, Th
    JAMA Network Open.2024; 7(11): e2444306.     CrossRef
  • Hemispheric Differences of 1 Hz rTMS over Motor and Premotor Cortex in Modulation of Neural Processing and Hand Function
    Jitka Veldema, Dennis Alexander Nowak, Kathrin Bösl, Alireza Gharabaghi
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Imaging and Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Review
    Hui Chang, Yixuan Sheng, Jinbiao Liu, Hongyu Yang, Xiangyu Pan, Honghai Liu
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.2023; 15(3): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Canadian Platform for Trials in Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim) Consensus Recommendations for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Upper Extremity Motor Stroke Rehabilitation Trials
    Jodi D. Edwards, Sandra E. Black, Shaun Boe, Lara Boyd, Arthur Chaves, Robert Chen, Sean Dukelow, Joyce Fung, Adam Kirton, Jed Meltzer, Zahra Moussavi, Jason Neva, Caroline Paquette, Michelle Ploughman, Sepideh Pooyania, Tarek K. Rajji, Marc Roig, Francoi
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2021; 35(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Effects of combined theta burst stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on stress
    Stefanie De Smet, Chris Baeken, Rudi De Raedt, Matias M. Pulopulos, Lais B. Razza, Stefaan Van Damme, Sara De Witte, Andre R. Brunoni, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(5): 1116.     CrossRef
  • rTMS combined with motor training changed the inter-hemispheric lateralization
    Jing-na Jin, Xin Wang, Ying Li, He Wang, Zhi-peng Liu, Tao Yin
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(10): 2735.     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation in the restoration of function after spinal cord injury
    Nicholas D James, Stephen B McMahon, Edelle C Field-Fote, Elizabeth J Bradbury
    The Lancet Neurology.2018; 17(10): 905.     CrossRef
  • The Persisted Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Task-Specific Induced Hand Recovery Following Subacute Stroke: Extended Study
    Jarugool Tretriluxana, Jenjira Thanakamchokchai, Chutima Jalayondeja, Narawut Pakaprot, Suradej Tretriluxana
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(6): 777.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Dual-Mode and Dual-Site Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Freezing of Gait in Patients With Parkinson Disease
    Won Hyuk Chang, Min Soo Kim, Eunhee Park, Jin Whan Cho, Jinyoung Youn, Yun Kwan Kim, Yun-Hee Kim
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2017; 98(7): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Can neurophysiologic measures serve as biomarkers for the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of major depressive disorder?
    Brian Kobayashi, Ian A. Cook, Aimee M. Hunter, Michael J. Minzenberg, David E. Krantz, Andrew F. Leuchter
    International Review of Psychiatry.2017; 29(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to both primary motor cortices improves unimanual and bimanual dexterity
    Nils H. Pixa, Fabian Steinberg, Michael Doppelmayr
    Neuroscience Letters.2017; 643: 84.     CrossRef
  • Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Samuel S. Shin, Galit Pelled
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation over the bilateral primary motor cortices in stroke patients
    Jae Yong Cho, Ahee Lee, Min Su Kim, Eunhee Park, Won Hyuk Chang, Yong-Il Shin, Yun-Hee Kim
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation
    Bita Vaseghi, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,699 View
  • 62 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
TOP