• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

13
results for

"Transcranial direct current stimulation"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Transcranial direct current stimulation"

Original Articles
Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
Ka Ying Doris Miu, Ching Kok, Sau Shan Leung, Elaine Y. L. Chan, Elaine Wong
Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(6):428-437.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20093
Objective
To compare the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on upper limb function recovery among patients who recently had stroke.
Methods
Subjects with recent stroke (within 1 month) were randomized to rTMS (n=25) and tDCS (n=26) applied over the non-lesioned hemisphere for three sessions per week, followed by tailored upper limb rehabilitation training for a total of 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer arm score test, Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), hand grip strength, and modified Barthel Index at weeks 2 and 4. Both therapists responsible for training and assessment were blinded to the intervention allocated.
Results
There was an improvement in all the motor performance scales among both groups (p<0.001). These improvements persisted at discharge. However, there was no significant difference in any of the assessment scales between the two groups. The rTMS group showed a statistically non-significant greater improvement in MAS, 9HPT, and handgrip strength than the tDCS group.
Conclusion
Both interventions produce a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function. There was no statistically significant difference between the two intervention methods with respect to motor performance. It is suggested that a larger study may help to clarify the superiority of either methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation
    Ayesha Juhi, Manul Das, Dinesh Bhatia, Suman Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shreya Sharma, Pritam Kumar Chaudhary, Chanchal Goyal, Md Asif Khan, Himel Mondal
    MethodsX.2025; 14: 103209.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy of different protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function, activities of daily living, and neurological function in patients with early stroke: a systema
    Xueyi Ni, Zinan Yuan, Ruimou Xie, Xiaoxue Zhai, Xiang Cheng, Yu Pan
    Neurological Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Multi-Electrode Transcranial Direct Current Stimulator (ME-tDCS): Design considerations and safety aspects
    Cassandra Solomons, Vivekanandan Shanmugasundaram, Sivasakthi Murugan Velayutham
    Heliyon.2025; 11(7): e43039.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation for functional recovery in animal models of stroke: A systematic review
    Antonio Rodríguez, Laura Amaya-Pascasio, María Gutiérrez-Fernández, José García-Pinteño, Margarita Moreno, Patricia Martínez-Sánchez
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2024; 156: 105485.     CrossRef
  • The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Benedetta Capetti, Lorenzo Conti, Chiara Marzorati, Roberto Grasso, Roberta Ferrucci, Gabriella Pravettoni, J. Michael Wyss
    Neural Plasticity.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gamma oscillations induced by 40-Hz visual-auditory stimulation for the treatment of acute-phase limb motor rehabilitation after stroke: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Wang Fu, Xiaoming Yu, Minghui Lai, Yuanli Li, Yingting Yang, Yong Qin, Min Yu, Feng Wang, Cong Wang
    Trials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Changes in the Ischemic Brain as Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Targets—TMS and tDCS Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Combination Therapies
    Aleksandra Markowska, Beata Tarnacka
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(7): 1560.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coupled With Visual‐Feedback Cycling Exercise Improves Walking Ability and Walking Stability After Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Study
    Yixiu Wang, Xiaoming Chen, Menghuan Wang, Yingying Pan, Shiyi Li, Mengfei He, Feng Lin, Zhongli Jiang, Zhiyong Zhao
    Neural Plasticity.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cancer Pain Management in Nonbrain Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis
    Yung-Jiun Chien, Chun-Yu Chang, Meng-Yu Wu, Yung-Chen Chien, Hsin-Chi Wu, Yi-Shiung Horng, Saskia F. A. Duijts
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Relieving Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Ji-Soo Baik, Jung-Hyun Yang, Sung-Hwa Ko, So-Jung Lee, Yong-Il Shin
    Life.2023; 13(5): 1172.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Lower Limb Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation
    Qian Duan, Wenying Liu, Jinhui Yang, Ben Huang, Jie Shen, Laura Baroncelli
    Neural Plasticity.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation
    Filip Stefanovic, Julian A. Martinez, Ghazala T. Saleem, Sue Ann Sisto, Michael T. Miller, Yaa A. Achampong, Albert H. Titus
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function and Performance in Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Ishtiaq Ahmed, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Simone Rossi, Fatih A. Cavdar, Seth Kwame Agyenkwa, Marco Y.C. Pang, Sofia Straudi
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(10): 1683.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled tria
    Hee-Mun Cho, Seungwoo Cha, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Qingqing Zhao, Hong Li, Yu Liu, Haonan Mei, Liying Guo, Xianying Liu, Xiaolin Tao, Jiang Ma
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial-Direct-Current-Stimulation Accelerates Motor Recovery After Cortical Infarction in Mice: The Interplay of Structural Cellular Responses and Functional Recovery
    Helene Luise Walter, Anton Pikhovych, Heike Endepols, Steffen Rotthues, Johannes Bärmann, Heiko Backes, Mathias Hoehn, Dirk Wiedermann, Bernd Neumaier, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Maria Adele Rueger, Michael Schroeter
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2022; 36(10-11): 701.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neurostimulations for Upper Extremity Function Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Tao Xue, Zeya Yan, Jiahao Meng, Wei Wang, Shujun Chen, Xin Wu, Feng Gu, Xinyu Tao, Wenxue Wu, Zhouqing Chen, Yutong Bai, Zhong Wang, Jianguo Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(20): 6162.     CrossRef
  • 5,488 View
  • 198 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Effects of Electric Cortical Stimulation (ECS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Rats With a Traumatic Brain Injury
Ki Pi Yu, Yong-Soon Yoon, Jin Gyeong Lee, Ji Sun Oh, Jeong-Seog Lee, Taeyong Seog, Han-Young Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(4):502-513.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.502
Objective
To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation (ECS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor and cognitive function recovery and brain plasticity in focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) of rats model.
Methods
Forty rats were pre-trained to perform a single pellet reaching task (SPRT), rotarod test (RRT), and Y-maze test for 14 days, then a focal TBI was induced by a weight drop model on the motor cortex. All rats were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: anodal ECS (50 Hz and 194 μs) (ECS group), tDCS (0.1 mA, 50 Hz and 200 μs) (tDCS group), and no stimulation as a control group. Four-week stimulation, including rehabilitation, was started 3 days after the operation. SPRT, RRT, and Y-maze were measured from day 1 to day 28 after the TBI was induced. Histopathological and immunohistochemistry staining evaluations were performed at 4 weeks.
Results
SPRT was improved from day 7 to day 26 in ECS, and from day 8 to day 26 in tDCS compared to the control group (p<0.05). SPRT of ECS group was significantly improved on days 3, 8, 9, and 17 compared to the tDCS group. Y-maze was improved from day 8 to day 16 in ECS, and on days 6, 12, and 16 in the tDCS group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Y-maze of the ECS group was significantly improved on day 9 to day 15 compared to the tDCS group. The c-Fos protein expression was better in the ECS group and the tDCS group compared to the control group.
Conclusion
Electric stimulation in rats modified with a focal TBI is effective for motor recovery and brain plasticity. ECS induced faster behavioral and cognitive improvements compared to tDCS during the recovery period of rats with a focal TBI.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neurophysiological Markers of Reward Processing Can Inform Preclinical Neurorehabilitation Approaches for Cognitive Impairments Following Brain Injury
    Miranda Francoeur Koloski, Reyana Menon, Victoria Krasnyanskiy
    Brain Sciences.2025; 15(5): 471.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Intersection of Brain–Computer Interfaces and Quantum Sensing: A Review of Research Progress and Future Trends
    Kun Liao, Zhaochu Yang, Dong Tao, Libo Zhao, Nuno Pires, Carlos Alberto Dorao, Bjørn Torger Stokke, Lars Eric Roseng, Wen Liu, Zhuangde Jiang
    Advanced Quantum Technologies.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery
    Purvi Kaurani, Ana Vitoria Moreira de Marchi Apolaro, Keerthi Kunchala, Shriya Maini, Huda A F Rges, Ashley Isaac, Mohit Lakkimsetti, Mohammed Raake, Zahra Nazir
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation Therapies in Pre-Clinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Translational Applications
    Shanan Surendrakumar, Thallita Kelly Rabelo, Ana Carolina P. Campos, Adriano Mollica, Agessandro Abrahao, Nir Lipsman, Matthew J. Burke, Clement Hamani
    Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 40(5-6): 435.     CrossRef
  • Effects of single session transcranial direct current stimulation on aerobic performance and one arm pull-down explosive force of professional rock climbers
    Jia Luo, Caihua Fang, Sen Huang, Jinlong Wu, Bowen Liu, Jingxuan Yu, Wen Xiao, Zhanbing Ren
    Frontiers in Physiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research
    D. Ziesel, M. Nowakowska, S. Scheruebel, K. Kornmueller, U. Schäfer, R. Schindl, C. Baumgartner, M. Üçal, T. Rienmüller
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on loss of motor function caused by experimental mild traumatic brain injury
    Güven AKÇAY, Recep BAYDEMİR
    Cukurova Medical Journal.2023; 48(3): 972.     CrossRef
  • Optogenetics for Understanding and Treating Brain Injury: Advances in the Field and Future Prospects
    Yuwen Sun, Manrui Li, Shuqiang Cao, Yang Xu, Peiyan Wu, Shuting Xu, Qian Pan, Yadong Guo, Yi Ye, Zheng Wang, Hao Dai, Xiaoqi Xie, Xiameng Chen, Weibo Liang
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(3): 1800.     CrossRef
  • Using dual polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation in global cerebral ischemia and its following reperfusion period attenuates neuronal injury
    Rasoul Kaviannejad, Seyed Morteza Karimian, Esmail Riahi, Ghorbangol Ashabi
    Metabolic Brain Disease.2022; 37(5): 1503.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary Study on Safety Assessment of 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Rat Brain
    Sung Suk Oh, Yoon Bum Lee, Jae Sun Jeon, Sang-Hyun An, Jong-ryul Choi
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(11): 5299.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Acute Stage of Traumatic Brain Injury Improves Functional Recovery
    Liang-Chao Wang, Wei-Yen Wei, Pei-Chuan Ho
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 1965.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Invasive Surgical Approaches
    Jakov Tiefenbach, Hugh H. Chan, Andre G. Machado, Kenneth B. Baker
    Neurosurgery.2022; 91(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • Cortical Electrical Stimulation Ameliorates Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Sensorimotor and Cognitive Deficits in Rats
    Chi-Wei Kuo, Ming-Yuan Chang, Hui-Hua Liu, Xiao-Kuo He, Shu-Yen Chan, Ying-Zu Huang, Chih-Wei Peng, Pi-Kai Chang, Chien-Yuan Pan, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rodent models used in preclinical studies of deep brain stimulation to rescue memory deficits
    Matthieu Faillot, Antoine Chaillet, Stéphane Palfi, Suhan Senova
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2021; 130: 410.     CrossRef
  • Optogenetic Modulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Samantha L. Delaney, Julian L. Gendreau, Marissa D'Souza, Austin Y. Feng, Allen L. Ho
    Stem Cells and Development.2020; 29(4): 187.     CrossRef
  • Cathodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Selectively Decreases Impulsivity after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
    Kris M. Martens, Kristen M. Pechacek, Cassandra G. Modrak, Virginia J. Milleson, Binxing Zhu, Cole Vonder Haar
    Journal of Neurotrauma.2019; 36(19): 2827.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing rehabilitation and functional recovery after brain and spinal cord trauma with electrical neuromodulation
    Anna-Sophie Hofer, Martin E. Schwab
    Current Opinion in Neurology.2019; 32(6): 828.     CrossRef
  • Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes
    Edgard Morya, Kátia Monte-Silva, Marom Bikson, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli, Andre Fonseca, Tommaso Bocci, Faranak Farzan, Raaj Chatterjee, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado, André Russowsky Brunoni, Eva Mezger, Luciane
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,378 View
  • 163 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neglect Syndrome in Stroke Patients
You Gyoung Yi, Min Ho Chun, Kyung Hee Do, Eun Jung Sung, Yong Gyu Kwon, Dae Yul Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(2):223-229.   Published online April 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.223
Objective

To examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) improves visuospatial attention in stroke patients with left visuospatial neglect.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: anodal tDCS over the right PPC, cathodal tDCS over the left PPC, or sham tDCS. Each patient underwent 15 sessions of tDCS (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks; 2 mA for 30 minutes in each session). Outcome measures were assessed before treatment and 1 week after completing the treatment.

Results

From pre- to post-treatment, there was an improvement in the motor-free visual perception test (MVPT), line bisection test (LBT), star cancellation test (SCT), Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Functional Ambulation Classification in all 3 groups. Improvements in the MVPT, SCT, and LBT were greater in the anodal and cathodal groups than in the sham group. However, improvements in other outcomes were not significantly different between the 3 groups, although there was a tendency for improved CBS or K-MBI scores in the anodal and cathodal groups, as compared with the sham group.

Conclusion

The study results indicated that the facilitatory effect of anodal tDCS applied over the right PPC, and the inhibitory effect of cathodal tDCS applied over the left PPC, improved symptoms of visuospatial neglect. Thus, tDCS could be a successful adjuvant therapeutic modality to recover neglect symptom, but this recovery might not lead to improvements in activities of daily living function and gait function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with motor-cognitive intervention on post-stroke cognitive impairment
    Liya Zhang, Liang Zhou, Qing Ye, Li Zhang, Yurou Kong, Siying Xia
    Neurological Sciences.2024; 45(4): 1581.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Mengyu Yan, Jiarui Liu, Yiming Guo, Qingtao Hou, Jiaqi Song, Xiaoqin Wang, Weihua Yu, Yang Lü
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment
    Kelly L. Sloane, Roy H. Hamilton
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(6): 614.     CrossRef
  • Suppressing contextually irrelevant meanings of homophonic versus heterophonic homographs: A tDCS study targeting LIFG
    Haim Raviv, Nira Mashal, Orna Peleg
    Brain and Cognition.2024; 181: 106212.     CrossRef
  • Innovative Therapy Combining Neck Muscle Vibration and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Association with Conventional Rehabilitation in Left Unilateral Spatial Neglect Patients: HEMISTIM Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sarah Millot, Jean-Marie Beis, Jonathan Pierret, Marina Badin, Verginia Sabau, Laurent Bensoussan, Jean Paysant, Hadrien Ceyte
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(4): 678.     CrossRef
  • Homonymous hemianopia and visual neglect: Part II ― rehabilitation
    Marina A. Shurupova, Alina D. Aizenshtein, Galina E. Ivanova
    Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation.2023; 5(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • The myth of TMS-induced ipsilateral enhancement in visual detection paradigms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inhibitory parietal TMS studies in healthy participants
    Ting Wang, Tom de Graaf, Joshua Williams, Zhihao Wang, Teresa Schuhmann, Felix Duecker, Alexander T. Sack
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2023; 155: 105437.     CrossRef
  • Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke
    Baruc Campos, Hoseok Choi, Andrew T. DeMarco, Anna Seydell-Greenwald, Sara J. Hussain, Mary T. Joy, Peter E. Turkeltaub, William Zeiger
    The Journal of Neuroscience.2023; 43(45): 7489.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of scalp stimulation for multidomain cognitive impairment in patients with post‐stroke cognitive impairment and dementia: A network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of moderators
    Minjie Xu, Ying Li, Chi Zhang, Yanan Ma, Leyi Zhang, Yuai Yang, Zihan Zhang, Tiantian Meng, Junyi He, Haifang Wang, Shuren Li, Georg S Kranz, Mingjing Zhao, Jingling Chang
    Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2023; 16(4): 505.     CrossRef
  • Using non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation for neglect and associated attentional deficits following stroke
    Elena Olgiati, Paresh A. Malhotra
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2022; 32(5): 735.     CrossRef
  • From Patient to Musician: A Multi-Sensory Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Tool for Spatial Neglect
    Joris Heyse, Stéphanie Carlier, Ewoud Verhelst, Catharine Vander Linden, Femke De Backere, Filip De Turck
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(3): 1242.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Dosage and Associated Therapy on Motor Recovery Post-stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alan-Michael D. Chow, Jeonghwa Shin, Hongwu Wang, Jeremy Mikhail Kellawan, Hugo M. Pereira
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive neuromodulation for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lingling Li, Hailiang Huang
    Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(10): 5861.     CrossRef
  • Non‐invasive Brain Stimulation Can Reduce Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke: ELETRON Trial
    Taís Regina da Silva, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes, Laís Geronutti Martins, Rafael Dalle Molle da Costa, Juli Thomaz de Souza, Fernanda Cristina Winckler, Lorena Cristina Alvarez Sartor, Gabriel Pinheiro Modolo, Natalia Cristina Ferreira, Josiela Cristi
    Annals of Neurology.2022; 92(3): 400.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
    Anna Gorsler, Ulrike Grittner, Torsten Rackoll, Nadine Külzow
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    B. González-Rodriguez, N. Serradell-Ribé, R. Viejo-Sobera, J. P. Romero-Muñoz, Elena M. Marron
    Journal of Neurology.2022; 269(12): 6310.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect
    Gemma Learmonth, Christopher S.Y. Benwell, Gesine Märker, Diana Dascalu, Matthew Checketts, Celestine Santosh, Mark Barber, Matthew Walters, Keith W. Muir, Monika Harvey
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2021; 31(8): 1163.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postural training using a whole-body tilt apparatus in subacute stroke patients with lateropulsion: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Chang-Man An, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Dae-hyun Kim, Gi-Wook Kim
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2021; 64(2): 101393.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing creativity by altering the frontoparietal control network functioning using transcranial direct current stimulation
    Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, Nira Mashal
    Experimental Brain Research.2021; 239(2): 613.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Shih-Ching Chen, Ling-Yu Yang, Muhammad Adeel, Chien-Hung Lai, Chih-Wei Peng
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury
    Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after stroke
    Jitka Veldema, Kathrin Bösl, Günter Neumann, Geert Verheyden, Dennis Alexander Nowak
    CNS Spectrums.2020; 25(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Noninvasive Peripheral Stimulation for Neglect Syndrome Following Acquired Brain Injury
    Giuseppe Lucente, Josep Valls-Sole, Narda Murillo, John Rothwell, Jaume Coll, Antoni Davalos, Hatice Kumru
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2020; 23(3): 312.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Stroke Recovery Across the Life Span With Noninvasive Neurostimulation
    Sean Dukelow, Adam Kirton
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 37(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • P212 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke neglect rehabilitation: A research proposal for a triple blind controlled trial
    E.M. Marron, B. Gonzalez Rodríguez, D. de Noreña, M. Ríos Lago, J.P. Romero
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(4): e136.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery Following Brain Injury
    April Pruski, Gabriela Cantarero
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2020; 8(3): 268.     CrossRef
  • Kurzfassung der S1-Leitlinie „Rehabilitation bei Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126)
    Hans-Otto Karnath, Josef Zihl, Thomas Benke, Doris Brötz, Sabine Brinkmann, Helmut Hildebrandt, Georg Kerkhoff, Corina Kiesewalter, René Müri, Claus-W. Wallesch, Karl Wessel
    Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie.2020; 31(3): 129.     CrossRef
  • Relationship Between Line Bisection Test Time and Hemispatial Neglect Prognosis in Patients With Stroke: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Shinyoung Kwon, Wookyung Park, MinYoung Kim, Jong Moon Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 44(4): 292.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between Visual Perception and Microstructural Change of the Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus in Patients with Brain Injury in the Right Hemisphere: A Preliminary Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study
    Su-Hong Kim, Hyeong-Eun Jeon, Chan-Hyuk Park
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(9): 641.     CrossRef
  • Funktionserholung nach Schlaganfall und die therapeutische Rolle der nicht-invasiven Hirnstimulation
    Caroline Tscherpel, Christian Grefkes
    Klinische Neurophysiologie.2020; 51(04): 214.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enfoques top-down y bottom-up para el tratamiento de la heminegligencia espacial en sujetos con ictus: revisión sistemática
    A. Dintén-Fernández, P. Fernández-González, A. Koutsou, I.M. Alguacil-Diego, S. Laguarta-Val, F. Molina-Rueda
    Rehabilitación.2019; 53(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review
    Eline C. C. van Lieshout, Roel F. van Hooijdonk, Rick M. Dijkhuizen, J. M. Anne Visser-Meily, Tanja C. W. Nijboer
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2019; 33(5): 355.     CrossRef
  • Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
    Paul Theo Zebhauser, Marine Vernet, Evelyn Unterburger, Anna-Katharine Brem
    Neuropsychology Review.2019; 29(4): 397.     CrossRef
  • Improving Naming Abilities Among Healthy Young-Old Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, Nira Mashal
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.2018; 47(1): 113.     CrossRef
  • Motor cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improves acute stroke visuo-spatial neglect: A series of four case reports
    S. Bornheim, P. Maquet, J.L. Croisier, J.M. Crielaard, J.F. Kaux
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(2): 459.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ana Paula S. Salazar, Patrícia G. Vaz, Ritchele R. Marchese, Cinara Stein, Camila Pinto, Aline S. Pagnussat
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2018; 99(2): 355.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Unilateral Neglect After Stroke
    Jingjing Fan, Yi Li, Yonghong Yang, Yun Qu, Shasha Li
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2018; 97(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016
    Deog Young Kim, Yun-Hee Kim, Jongmin Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Min-Wook Kim, Sung-Bom Pyun, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Suk Hoon Ohn, Ki Deok Park, Byung-Mo Oh, Seong Hoon Lim, Kang Jae Jung, Byung-Ju Ryu, Sun Im, Sung Ju Jee, Han Gil Seo, Ueon Woo Rah, Joo Hyun Park, Min
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention
    L. C. Reteig, L. J. Talsma, M. R. van Schouwenburg, H. A. Slagter
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.2017; 1(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: The Impact of Baseline Severity and Task Specificity in a Pilot Sample
    Catherine Norise, Daniela Sacchetti, Roy Hamilton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of cerebrovascular accidents
    Alaa S. Bou Ghannam, Prem S. Subramanian
    Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.2017; 28(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • 6,374 View
  • 191 Download
  • 38 Web of Science
  • 43 Crossref
Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
Eunhee Park, Yun-Hee Kim, Won Hyuk Chang, Tae Gun Kwon, Yong-Il Shin
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(3):297-303.   Published online June 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297
Objective

To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation.

Results

Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation.

Conclusion

Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression
    Dongsheng Zhou, Xingxing Li, Shuochi Wei, Chang Yu, Dongmei Wang, Yuchen Li, Jiaxin Li, Junyao Liu, Shen Li, Wenhao Zhuang, Yanli Li, Ruichenxi Luo, Zhiwang Liu, Jimeng Liu, Yongming Xu, Jialin Fan, Guidong Zhu, Weiqian Xu, Yiping Tang, Raymond Y. Cho, Th
    JAMA Network Open.2024; 7(11): e2444306.     CrossRef
  • Hemispheric Differences of 1 Hz rTMS over Motor and Premotor Cortex in Modulation of Neural Processing and Hand Function
    Jitka Veldema, Dennis Alexander Nowak, Kathrin Bösl, Alireza Gharabaghi
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Imaging and Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Review
    Hui Chang, Yixuan Sheng, Jinbiao Liu, Hongyu Yang, Xiangyu Pan, Honghai Liu
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.2023; 15(3): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Canadian Platform for Trials in Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim) Consensus Recommendations for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Upper Extremity Motor Stroke Rehabilitation Trials
    Jodi D. Edwards, Sandra E. Black, Shaun Boe, Lara Boyd, Arthur Chaves, Robert Chen, Sean Dukelow, Joyce Fung, Adam Kirton, Jed Meltzer, Zahra Moussavi, Jason Neva, Caroline Paquette, Michelle Ploughman, Sepideh Pooyania, Tarek K. Rajji, Marc Roig, Francoi
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2021; 35(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Effects of combined theta burst stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on stress
    Stefanie De Smet, Chris Baeken, Rudi De Raedt, Matias M. Pulopulos, Lais B. Razza, Stefaan Van Damme, Sara De Witte, Andre R. Brunoni, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(5): 1116.     CrossRef
  • rTMS combined with motor training changed the inter-hemispheric lateralization
    Jing-na Jin, Xin Wang, Ying Li, He Wang, Zhi-peng Liu, Tao Yin
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(10): 2735.     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation in the restoration of function after spinal cord injury
    Nicholas D James, Stephen B McMahon, Edelle C Field-Fote, Elizabeth J Bradbury
    The Lancet Neurology.2018; 17(10): 905.     CrossRef
  • The Persisted Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Task-Specific Induced Hand Recovery Following Subacute Stroke: Extended Study
    Jarugool Tretriluxana, Jenjira Thanakamchokchai, Chutima Jalayondeja, Narawut Pakaprot, Suradej Tretriluxana
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(6): 777.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Dual-Mode and Dual-Site Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Freezing of Gait in Patients With Parkinson Disease
    Won Hyuk Chang, Min Soo Kim, Eunhee Park, Jin Whan Cho, Jinyoung Youn, Yun Kwan Kim, Yun-Hee Kim
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2017; 98(7): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Can neurophysiologic measures serve as biomarkers for the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of major depressive disorder?
    Brian Kobayashi, Ian A. Cook, Aimee M. Hunter, Michael J. Minzenberg, David E. Krantz, Andrew F. Leuchter
    International Review of Psychiatry.2017; 29(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to both primary motor cortices improves unimanual and bimanual dexterity
    Nils H. Pixa, Fabian Steinberg, Michael Doppelmayr
    Neuroscience Letters.2017; 643: 84.     CrossRef
  • Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Samuel S. Shin, Galit Pelled
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation over the bilateral primary motor cortices in stroke patients
    Jae Yong Cho, Ahee Lee, Min Su Kim, Eunhee Park, Won Hyuk Chang, Yong-Il Shin, Yun-Hee Kim
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation
    Bita Vaseghi, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,509 View
  • 62 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Randomized, Sham Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Yon Joon Kim, Jeonghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Dal Jae Im, Hye Sun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(6):766-776.   Published online December 23, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766
Objective

To investigate the analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and sham tDCS in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN).

Methods

Patients with PDPN (n=60) were divided randomly into the three groups (n=20 per group). Each group received anodal tDCS with the anode centered over the left M1, DLPFC, or sham stimulation for 20 minutes at intensity of 2 mA for 5 consecutive days. A blinded physician rated the patients' pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score, anxiety score, sleep quality, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the pain threshold (PT) to pressure.

Results

After the tDCS sessions, the M1 group showed a significantly greater reduction in VAS for pain and PT versus the sham and DLPFC groups (p<0.001). The reduction in VAS for pain was sustained after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up in the M1 group compared with the sham group (p<0.001, p=0.007). Significant differences were observed among the three groups over time in VAS for pain (p<0.001), CGI score (p=0.01), and PT (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among the groups in sleep quality, anxiety score, or BDI score immediately after tDCS.

Conclusion

Five daily sessions of tDCS over the M1 can produce immediate pain relief, and relief 2- and 4-week in duration in patients with PDPN. Our findings provide the first evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS on PDPN.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Working memory ımprovement after transcranial direct current stimulation paired with working memory training ın diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Serkan Aksu, Buse Rahime Hasırcı Bayır, Ceyhun Sayman, Ahmet Zihni Soyata, Gökalp Boz, Sacit Karamürsel
    Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2025; 32(1): 231.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation beyond the motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effects on quantitative sensory testing in clinical pain
    Andrew Flood, Rocco Cavaleri, We-Ju Chang, Jason Kutch, Constantino Toufexis, Simon J Summers
    Pain Medicine.2025; 26(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • The comparative evidence of efficacy of non-invasive brain and nerve stimulation in diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ping-Tao Tseng, Bing-Yan Zeng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Chao-Ming Hung, Brendon Stubbs, Yen-Wen Chen, Tien-Yu Chen, Jiann-Jy Chen, Wei-Te Lei, Yow-Ling Shiue, Chih-Sung Liang
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the separate and combined effects of anodal tDCS over the M1 and F3 regions on pain relief in patients with type-2 diabetes suffering from neuropathic pain
    Ahmad Alipour, Roghayeh Mohammadi
    Neuroscience Letters.2024; 818: 137554.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review
    Qiao Kong, Tingting Li, Sveta Reddy, Sierra Hodges, Jian Kong
    Neurotherapeutics.2024; 21(1): e00297.     CrossRef
  • Inflammation, brain connectivity, and neuromodulation in post-traumatic headache
    Fernando da Silva Fiorin, Caroline Cunha do Espírito Santo, Joyce T. Da Silva, Man-Kyo Chung
    Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health.2024; 35: 100723.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Ameliorates Stress-Induced Sleep Disruption via Activating Infralimbic-Ventrolateral Preoptic Projections
    Yu-Jie Su, Pei-Lu Yi, Fang-Chia Chang
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiqi Wu, Xiaoyun Li, Yinhua Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Richu Jin, Weiwei Peng
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research.2024; 185: 111868.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Strategies for Brain Doping in an Animal Model via Quantitative Analysis of Neurochemicals
    Yoeseph Cho, Seongeun Jeon, Yejin Lee, Hana Park, Yinglan Xu, Mijin Jeon, Sunmi Jung, Minyoung Kim, Ahlim Chin, Sang Sun Yoon, Junghyun Son
    Separations.2023; 10(7): 413.     CrossRef
  • Stimulation corticale pour le traitement de la douleur
    L. Garcia-Larrea, N. André-Obadia, S. Rostaing, C. Colomb
    Douleur et Analgésie.2023; 36(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation for chronic pain management: a narrative review of analgesic mechanisms and clinical evidence
    Michał Szymoniuk, Jia-Hsuan Chin, Łukasz Domagalski, Mateusz Biszewski, Katarzyna Jóźwik, Piotr Kamieniak
    Neurosurgical Review.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive cortical stimulation for drug-resistant pain
    Luis Garcia-Larrea
    Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 17(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Long-term analgesic effect of trans-spinal direct current stimulation compared to non-invasive motor cortex stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-Francois Payen, Enkelejda Hodaj, Marc Sorel, Anne Dumolard, Laurent Vercueil, Chantal Delon-Martin, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Communications.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of massage, passive neural mobilization and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) of the tibial nerve in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus induced neuropathy: a case report
    Goyal Manu, Mittal Amit, Samuel Asir John
    Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.2022; 38(13): 3273.     CrossRef
  • Effects of rTMS and tDCS on neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study
    Erickson Duarte Bonifácio de Assis, Wanessa Kallyne Nascimento Martins, Carolina Dias de Carvalho, Clarice Martins Ferreira, Ruth Gomes, Evelyn Thais de Almeida Rodrigues, Ussânio Mororó Meira, Ledycnarf Januário de Holanda, Ana Raquel Lindquist, Edgard M
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relieving Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Effects on Pain Intensity, Quality, and Pain-Related Outcomes
    Marie-Philippe Harvey, Marylie Martel, Francis Houde, Inès Daguet, Eléonor Riesco, Guillaume Léonard
    Frontiers in Pain Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD)
    Jooyeon Jamie Im, Seunghee Na, Sanghoon Kang, Hyeonseok Jeong, Eek-Sung Lee, Tae-Kyeong Lee, Woo-Young Ahn, Yong-An Chung, In-Uk Song
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cortical stimulation for chronic pain: from anecdote to evidence
    Luis GARCIA-LARREA, Charles QUESADA
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is transcranial direct current stimulation beneficial for treating pain, depression, and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu-Rong Wen, Jian Shi, Zheng-Yu Hu, Yang-Yang Lin, You-Tian Lin, Xue Jiang, Rui Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yu-Ling Wang
    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Sleep Disturbances
    Young-Ji Lee, Bong-Jo Kim, Cheol-Soon Lee, Boseok Cha, So-Jin Lee, Jae-Won Choi, Eunji Lim, Nuree Kang, Dongyun Lee
    Chronobiology in Medicine.2022; 4(4): 141.     CrossRef
  • Can a tDCS treatment enhance subjective and objective sleep among student-athletes?
    Jonathan Charest, Alexandre Marois, Celyne H. Bastien
    Journal of American College Health.2021; 69(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Visual Illusion Effect According to Sensory Phenotypes in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain
    Dolors Soler, David Moriña, Hatice Kumru, Joan Vidal, Xavier Navarro
    The Journal of Pain.2021; 22(1): 86.     CrossRef
  • The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on sleep disturbances among different neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions: A systematic review
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Audrey Bellemare, Gabrielle Beetz, Sophie-A. Vinet, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne, Louis De Beaumont
    Sleep Medicine Reviews.2021; 55: 101381.     CrossRef
  • Towards the endotyping of the sleep–pain interaction: a topical review on multitarget strategies based on phenotypic vulnerabilities and putative pathways
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Gabrielle Beetz, Nicole K.Y. Tang, Raphael Heinzer, Jo Nijs, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne
    Pain.2021; 162(5): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimental pain perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoyun Li, Junjie Yao, Wenyun Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Weiwei Peng
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(9): 2163.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for provoked vestibulodynia: What roles do psychosexual factors play in treatment response?
    Mélanie Morin, Annie Morin, Véronique Gougeon, Serge Marchand, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Audrey Brassard, Justine Benoit-Piau, Guillaume Léonard
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 93: 54.     CrossRef
  • Efectos de la estimulación no invasiva de la corteza motora en las pruebas sensoriales cuantitativas en sujetos sanos y con dolor crónico: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    NeuroTarget.2021; 15(3): 45.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation methods in the treatment of chronic pain
    X. Moisset, M. Lanteri-Minet, D. Fontaine
    Journal of Neural Transmission.2020; 127(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial
    Galeno Ferreira, Edson Silva-Filho, Antônio de Oliveira, Clemilda de Lucena, Johnnatas Lopes, Rodrigo Pegado
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(1): 327.     CrossRef
  • Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex attenuates capsaicin‐induced dynamic mechanical allodynia and mechanical pain sensitivity in humans
    Sam W. Hughes, Grace Ward, Paul H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2020; 24(6): 1130.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive motor cortex stimulation effects on quantitative sensory testing in healthy and chronic pain subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    Pain.2020; 161(9): 1955.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor - Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial”
    Satkarjit Kaur Jhandi, Nidhi Sharma, Manu Goyal
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(2): 2025.     CrossRef
  • Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Júlia Schirmer Saldanha, Maxciel Zortea, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive neuromodulation effects on painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiyan Zeng, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Ying Cao, Ying Li, Jinming Zhang, Caifeng Yang, Felipe Fregni
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Pain Processing
    Wei-Yi Ong, Christian S. Stohler, Deron R. Herr
    Molecular Neurobiology.2019; 56(2): 1137.     CrossRef
  • Primary Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Temporal Summation of the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex in Healthy Subjects
    Sam Hughes, Sybil Grimsey, Paul H Strutton
    Pain Medicine.2019; 20(6): 1156.     CrossRef
  • Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP)
    Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Ana Mércia B.L. Fernandes, Katia Nunes Sá, Alexandre Hideki Okano, André Russowsky Brunoni, Argelia Lara-Solares, Aziza Jreige Iskandar, Carlos Guerrero, César Amescua-García, Durval Campos Kraychete, Egas Caparelli-Daquer, Elias
    PAIN Reports.2019; 4(1): e692.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis
    Maxciel Zortea, Leticia Ramalho, Rael Lopes Alves, Camila Fernanda da Silveira Alves, Gilberto Braulio, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) With Telehealth Support for Symptom Control in Chronically-Ill Patients With Multiple Symptoms
    Alexa Riggs, Vaishali Patel, Bhaskar Paneri, Russell K. Portenoy, Marom Bikson, Helena Knotkova
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Frequency‐dependent top‐down modulation of temporal summation by anodal transcranial direct‐current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy adults
    S.W. Hughes, M. Ali, P. Sharma, N. Insan, P.H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(8): 1494.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: A double‐blind randomized controlled trial
    G.N. Lewis, D.A. Rice, M. Kluger, P.J. McNair
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(7): 1312.     CrossRef
  • Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the motor cortex reduces chronic pain in Alcock canal syndrome
    Raffaella Ricci, Ada Ghiggia, Ilenia La Rosa, Azzurra Milano, Walter Troni, Mark S. George, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Lorys Castelli, Adriana Salatino
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(3): 648.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emerging therapies for neuropathic pain: new molecules or new indications for old treatments?
    Didier Bouhassira, Nadine Attal
    Pain.2018; 159(3): 576.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Andrea Antal, Samar S. Ayache, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Filippo Cogiamanian, Maria Cotelli, Dirk De Ridder, Roberta Ferrucci, Berthold Langguth, Paola Marangolo, Veit Mylius, Michael A. Nitsche, Frank Padberg, Ulrich Pa
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in women with provoked vestibulodynia
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Marie-Pierre Cyr, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2017; 216(6): 584.e1.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Long-Term Treatment of Chronic Pain Syndrome by Anodal tDCS of the Motor Cortex, Previously Resistant to High-Frequency rTMS and Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-François Payen, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(4): 618.     CrossRef
  • Potential Mechanisms Supporting the Value of Motor Cortex Stimulation to Treat Chronic Pain Syndromes
    Marcos F. DosSantos, Natália Ferreira, Rebecca L. Toback, Antônio C. Carvalho, Alexandre F. DaSilva
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials
    Luana V.M. Aparício, Fabiana Guarienti, Lais Boralli Razza, André F. Carvalho, Felipe Fregni, André Russowsky Brunoni
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(5): 671.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in women with provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    Trials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of left primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation on laser-evoked potentials in migraine patients and normal subjects
    Eleonora Vecchio, Katia Ricci, Anna Montemurno, Marianna Delussi, Sara Invitto, Marina de Tommaso
    Neuroscience Letters.2016; 626: 149.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Cortical neurostimulation for neuropathic pain
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Pain.2016; 157(Supplement): S81.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy
    Nadine Attal, Samar S. Ayache, Daniel Ciampi De Andrade, Alaa Mhalla, Sophie Baudic, Frédérique Jazat, Rechdi Ahdab, Danusa O. Neves, Marc Sorel, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Didier Bouhassira
    Pain.2016; 157(6): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool in the study of sensory-perceptual processing
    Thiago L. Costa, Olivia M. Lapenta, Paulo S. Boggio, Dora F. Ventura
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.2015; 77(6): 1813.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van't Wout, Benjamin L. Jacobson, Sarah L. Garnaat, Jason L. Kirschner, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2015; 16(8): 1580.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van’t Wout, Sarah L. Garnaat, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2015; : pnv042.     CrossRef
  • Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Tim Hagenacker, Vera Bude, Steffen Naegel, Dagny Holle, Zaza Katsarava, Hans-Christoph Diener, Mark Obermann
    The Journal of Headache and Pain.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,048 View
  • 83 Download
  • 59 Crossref
Effects of Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Aphasia in Chronic Stroke Patients
Seung Yeol Lee, Hee-Jung Cheon, Kyoung Jae Yoon, Won Hyuk Chang, Yun-Hee Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(5):603-610.   Published online October 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.603
Objective

To investigate any additional effect of dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared with single tDCS in chronic stroke patients with aphasia.

Methods

Eleven chronic stroke patients (aged 52.6±13.4 years, nine men) with aphasia were enrolled. Single anodal tDCS was applied over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and a cathodal electrode was placed over the left buccinator muscle. Dual tDCS was applied as follows: 1) anodal tDCS over the left IFG and cathodal tDCS over the left buccinator muscle and 2) cathodal tDCS over the right IFG and anodal tDCS over the right buccinator muscle. Each tDCS was delivered for 30 minutes at a 2-mA intensity. Speech therapy was provided during the last 15 minutes of the tDCS. Before and after the stimulation, the Korean-Boston Naming Test and a verbal fluency test were performed.

Results

The dual tDCS produced a significant improvement in the response time for the Korean-Boston Naming Test compared with the baseline assessment, with a significant interaction between the time and type of interventions. Both single and dual tDCS produced a significant improvement in the number of correct responses after stimulation with no significant interaction. No significant changes in the verbal fluency test were observed after single or dual tDCS.

Conclusion

The results conveyed that dual tDCS using anodal tDCS over the left IFG and cathodal tDCS over the right IFG may be more effective than a single anodal tDCS over the left IFG.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Recovery: A Review of Current Evidence and Therapeutic Strategies
    Nicholas Aderinto, Gbolahan Olatunji, Emmanuel Kokori, Chinonyelum Emmanuel Agbo, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, John Ehi Aboje, Edun Mariam Tolulope, Anuoluwa Oyeboyin Oyelude, Faith Adedayo Adejumo
    Current Treatment Options in Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Network Meta-Analysis of the Intervention Effects of Three Types of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Post-Stroke Aphasia Patients
    明慧 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(02): 1228.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review
    Ellen E. R. Williams, Sabrina Sghirripa, Nigel C. Rogasch, Brenton Hordacre, Stacie Attrill
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2024; 46(17): 3802.     CrossRef
  • Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia
    Priyanka Shah-Basak, Olga Boukrina, Xin Ran Li, Fatima Jebahi, Aneta Kielar
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2023; 41(3-4): 129.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation as an Adjunct to Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study
    Shereen J. Matar, Caroline Newton, Isaac O. Sorinola, Marousa Pavlou
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on verbal function in Broca's aphasia
    Saha Yekta, Alia Saberi, Kamran Ezzati, Kambiz Rohampour, Somayeh Ahmadi Gooraji, Samaneh Ghorbani Shirkouhi, Sasan Andalib
    Journal of Neurolinguistics.2022; 63: 101087.     CrossRef
  • Breaking the ice to improve motor outcomes in patients with chronic stroke: a retrospective clinical study on neuromodulation plus robotics
    Antonino Naro, Luana Billeri, Alfredo Manuli, Tina Balletta, Antonino Cannavò, Simona Portaro, Paola Lauria, Fabrizio Ciappina, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
    Neurological Sciences.2021; 42(7): 2785.     CrossRef
  • Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety
    Chiara Picano, Agnese Quadrini, Francesca Pisano, Paola Marangolo
    Brain Sciences.2021; 11(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Anodic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Speech Language Therapy on Nonfluent Poststroke Aphasia
    Qi Zhao, Jing Wang, Zheng Li, Luping Song, Xiaoli Li
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2021; 24(5): 923.     CrossRef
  • Effect of triangular electrode schemes on Broca’s cortical stimulation: conventional and HD-tDCS study
    Ali Amani, Maryam Yousefian, Hadi Seyedarabi, Mehdi Farhoudi
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.2021; 59(4): 913.     CrossRef
  • DUAL-tDCS Treatment over the Temporo-Parietal Cortex Enhances Writing Skills: First Evidence from Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia
    Francesca Pisano, Carlo Caltagirone, Chiara Incoccia, Paola Marangolo
    Life.2021; 11(4): 343.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation and Behavioral Training, a Promising Tool for a Tailor-Made Post-stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review
    Marina Zettin, Caterina Bondesan, Giulia Nada, Matteo Varini, Danilo Dimitri
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on language functioning: Combining neuromodulation and behavioral intervention in aphasia
    Paola Marangolo
    Neuroscience Letters.2020; 719: 133329.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Speech-language Therapy on Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study
    Elodie Guillouët, Mélanie Cogné, Elisabeth Saverot, Nicolas Roche, Pascale Pradat-Diehl, Agnès Weill-Chounlamountry, Vanessa Ramel, Catherine Taratte, Anne-Gaëlle Lachasse, Jean-Arthur Haulot, Isabelle Vaugier, Frédéric Barbot, Philippe Azouvi, Sophie Cha
    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.2020; 26(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Cognitive Training in Girls with Rett Syndrome
    Rosa Fabio, Antonio Gangemi, Martina Semino, Aglaia Vignoli, Alberto Priori, Maria Canevini, Gabriella Di Rosa, Tindara Caprì
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(5): 276.     CrossRef
  • Failure to Improve Verbal Fluency with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Jana Klaus, Gesa Hartwigsen
    Neuroscience.2020; 449: 123.     CrossRef
  • Enhancement of Facilitation Training for Aphasia by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Aya S. Ihara, Akiko Miyazaki, Yukihiro Izawa, Misaki Takayama, Kozo Hanayama, Jun Tanemura
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review
    Elisa Biou, Hélène Cassoudesalle, Mélanie Cogné, Igor Sibon, Isabelle De Gabory, Patrick Dehail, Jerome Aupy, Bertrand Glize
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 62(2): 104.     CrossRef
  • High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Verb Recovery in Aphasic Patients Depending on Current Intensity
    Valentina Fiori, Michael A. Nitsche, Gabriella Cucuzza, Carlo Caltagirone, Paola Marangolo
    Neuroscience.2019; 406: 159.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial grammar learning with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A pilot study
    Ellyn A. Riley, Ying Wu
    Brain Stimulation.2019; 12(5): 1307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Anodal tDCS on Articulatory Accuracy, Word Production, and Syllable Repetition in Subjects with Aphasia: A Crossover, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Camila Vila-Nova, Pedro H. Lucena, Rita Lucena, Giulia Armani-Franceschi, Fernanda Q. Campbell
    Neurology and Therapy.2019; 8(2): 411.     CrossRef
  • Modulating Brain Connectivity by Simultaneous Dual-Mode Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Jungsoo Lee, Eunhee Park, Ahee Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Dae-Shik Kim, Yong-Il Shin, Yun-Hee Kim
    Neural Plasticity.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua: estudo sobre respostas em tarefas de nomeação em afásicos
    Fabiane Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Paula Machado Goyano Mac-Kay, John ChiiTyng Chao, Michele Devido dos Santos, Rubens José Gagliadi
    CoDAS.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modulating the interhemispheric balance in healthy participants with transcranial direct current stimulation: No significant effects on word or sentence processing
    Svetlana Malyutina, Valeriya Zelenkova, Olga Buivolova, Elise J. Oosterhuis, Nikita Zmanovsky, Matteo Feurra
    Brain and Language.2018; 186: 60.     CrossRef
  • An update on medications and noninvasive brain stimulation to augment language rehabilitation in post-stroke aphasia
    Sadhvi Saxena, Argye E. Hillis
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2017; 17(11): 1091.     CrossRef
  • Limits to tDCS effects in language: Failures to modulate word production in healthy participants with frontal or temporal tDCS
    Samuel J. Westwood, Andrew Olson, R. Chris Miall, Raffaele Nappo, Cristina Romani
    Cortex.2017; 86: 64.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve naming ability in post-stroke aphasia: A critical review
    Mohammed F. ALHarbi, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Esther S. Kim
    Behavioural Brain Research.2017; 332: 7.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-stroke and Neurodegenerative Aphasia: Parallels, Differences, and Lessons Learned
    Catherine Norise, Roy H. Hamilton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The rehabilitative effects on written language of a combined language and parietal dual-tDCS treatment in a stroke case
    Barbara De Tommaso, Alessandro Piedimonte, Marcella M. Caglio, Federico D'Agata, Marcello Campagnoli, Laura Orsi, Simona Raimondo, Sergio Vighetti, Paolo Mortara, Giuseppe Massazza, Lorenzo Pinessi
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2017; 27(6): 904.     CrossRef
  • Differential effects of bihemispheric and unihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation in young and elderly adults in verbal learning
    Valentina Fiori, Michael Nitsche, Luigi Iasevoli, Gabriella Cucuzza, Carlo Caltagirone, Paola Marangolo
    Behavioural Brain Research.2017; 321: 170.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Andrea Antal, Samar S. Ayache, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Filippo Cogiamanian, Maria Cotelli, Dirk De Ridder, Roberta Ferrucci, Berthold Langguth, Paola Marangolo, Veit Mylius, Michael A. Nitsche, Frank Padberg, Ulrich Pa
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Language Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Aphasia: An Overview of Studies
    Maxim A. Ulanov, Yury Y. Shtyrov, Tatiana A. Stroganova
    SSRN Electronic Journal.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Value and Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Critical Review Since 2000
    Davide Cappon, Marjan Jahanshahi, Patrizia Bisiacchi
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation for Post-Stroke Aphasia
    Zafer Keser, Gerard E. Francisco
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2016; 4(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Fields or flows? A comparative metaanalysis of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation to treat post-stroke aphasia
    Priyanka P. Shah-Basak, Rachel Wurzman, Juliann B. Purcell, Felix Gervits, Roy Hamilton, Roy Hamilton
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2016; 34(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Modulating Human Auditory Processing by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
    Kai Heimrath, Marina Fiene, Katharina S. Rufener, Tino Zaehle
    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Taking Sides: An Integrative Review of the Impact of Laterality and Polarity on Efficacy of Therapeutic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Anomia in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia
    Margaret Sandars, Lauren Cloutman, Anna M. Woollams
    Neural Plasticity.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Novel Method for Enhancing Aphasia Treatment Effects
    Jennifer T. Crinion
    European Psychologist.2016; 21(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • Use of tDCS in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of the Behavioral Interventions Implemented With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Language Recovery
    Elizabeth E. Galletta, Peggy Conner, Amy Vogel-Eyny, Paola Marangolo
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia
    Elizabeth E. Galletta, Andrea Cancelli, Carlo Cottone, Ilaria Simonelli, Franca Tecchio, Marom Bikson, Paola Marangolo
    Brain Stimulation.2015; 8(6): 1108.     CrossRef
  • tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics
    Vânia de Aguiar, Caterina Laura Paolazzi, Gabriele Miceli
    Cortex.2015; 63: 296.     CrossRef
  • A framework for categorizing electrode montages in transcranial direct current stimulation
    Padideh Nasseri, Michael A. Nitsche, Hamed Ekhtiari
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Broca's Area Damage is Necessary but not Sufficient to Induce After-effects of cathodal tDCS on the Unaffected Hemisphere in Post-stroke Aphasia
    C. Rosso, V. Perlbarg, R. Valabregue, C. Arbizu, S. Ferrieux, B. Alshawan, P. Vargas, A. Leger, C. Zavanone, J.C. Corvol, S. Meunier, S. Lehéricy, Y. Samson
    Brain Stimulation.2014; 7(5): 627.     CrossRef
  • 5,861 View
  • 74 Download
  • 46 Crossref
Improvement of the Working Memory and Naming by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Seo Young Jeon, Soo Jeong Han
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(5):585-595.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.585
Objective

To investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the prefrontal cortex on the improvement of verbal, visuospatial working memory and naming in healthy adults.

Method

Thirty two healthy adults (15 males and 17 females, mean age 37.3±13.0 years) were enrolled in this study. The subjects were divided into four groups randomly. They underwent sham or anodal tDCS over the left or right prefrontal cortex, for 20 minutes at a direct current of 1 mA. Before and immediately after tDCS, the subjects performed the Korean version of the mini-mental state exam (K-MMSE) and stroop test (color/word/interference) for the screening of cognitive function. For working memory and language evaluation, the digit span test (forward/backward), the visuospatial attention test in computer assisted cognitive program (CogPack®) and the Korean-Boston Naming Test (K-BNT) were assessed before tDCS, immediately after tDCS, and 2 weeks after tDCS.

Results

The stroop test (word/interference), backward digit span test and K-BNT were improved in the left prefrontal tDCS group compared with that of the sham group (p<0.05). The stroop test (interference) and visuospatial attention test were in the right prefrontal tDCS group compared with that of the sham group (p<0.05). Their improvement lasted for 2 weeks after stimulation.

Conclusion

tDCS can induce verbal working memory improvement and naming facilitation by stimulating the left prefrontal cortex. It can also improve the visuospatial working memory by stimulating the right prefrontal cortex. Further studies which are lesion and symptom specific tDCS treatment for rehabilitation of stroke can be carried out.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Abdolvahed Narmashiri, Fatemeh Akbari
    Neuropsychology Review.2025; 35(1): 126.     CrossRef
  • Home-based, Remotely Supervised, 6-Week tDCS in Patients With Both MCI and Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Jiheon Kim, Seungchan Park, Hansol Kim, Daeyoung Roh, Do Hoon Kim
    Clinical EEG and Neuroscience.2024; 55(5): 531.     CrossRef
  • Meta-modeling the effects of anodal left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory performance
    Miles Wischnewski, Taylor A. Berger, Alexander Opitz
    Imaging Neuroscience.2024; 2: 1.     CrossRef
  • Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) and functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD) in healthy elderly and patients with MCI: modulation of age-related changes in word fluency and language lateralization
    Florian Heimann, Sabine Weiss, Horst M. Müller
    Frontiers in Aging.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence and sources of placebo effects in transcranial direct current stimulation during a single session of visuospatial working memory practice
    Andrew Hooyman, Nicole K. Haikalis, Peiyuan Wang, Heidi M. Schambra, Keith R. Lohse, Sydney Y. Schaefer
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive Function in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Two-Week Intervention
    Jaesub Park, Kyungmi Chung, Yoonkyung Oh, Kwang Joon Kim, Chang Oh Kim, Jin Young Park
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Facilitation of working memory capacity by transcranial direct current stimulation: a secondary analysis from the augmenting cognitive training in older adults (ACT) study
    Serkan Aksu, Aprinda Indahlastari, Andrew O’Shea, Michael Marsiske, Ronald Cohen, Gene E. Alexander, Steven T. DeKosky, Georg A. Hishaw, Yunfeng Dai, Samuel S. Wu, Adam J. Woods
    GeroScience.2024; 46(5): 4075.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Neurological and Behavioral Assessment of Central and Peripheral Stimulation Technologies for Induced Pain and Cognitive Tasks
    Muhammad Danish Mujib, Ahmad Zahid Rao, Muhammad Abul Hasan, Ayesha Ikhlaq, Hira Shahid, Nargis Bano, Muhammad Usman Mustafa, Faisal Mukhtar, Mehrun Nisa, Saad Ahmed Qazi
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(6): 1269.     CrossRef
  • High‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the parietal cortices modulates the neural dynamics underlying verbal working memory
    Yasra Arif, Richard W. Song, Seth D. Springer, Jason A. John, Christine M. Embury, Abraham D. Killanin, Jake J. Son, Hannah J. Okelberry, Kellen M. McDonald, Giorgia Picci, Tony W. Wilson
    Human Brain Mapping.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus stimulation (taVNS) improves human working memory performance under sleep deprivation stress
    Rui Zhao, Meng-Ying Chang, Chen Cheng, Qian-Qian Tian, Xue-Juan Yang, Meng-Yu Du, Ya-Peng Cui, Zhao-Yang He, Fu-Min Wang, Yao Kong, Hui Deng, Li-Ming Lu, Chun-Zhi Tang, Neng-Gui Xu, Jin-Bo Sun, Wei Qin
    Behavioural Brain Research.2023; 439: 114247.     CrossRef
  • Underpinning the neurological source of executive function following cross hemispheric tDCS stimulation
    Muhammad Abul Hasan, Hira Shahid, Saad Ahmed Qazi, Osama Ejaz, Muhammad Danish Mujib, Aleksandra Vuckovic
    International Journal of Psychophysiology.2023; 185: 1.     CrossRef
  • Differential Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation Over Left and Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Brain Oscillatory Responses During a Working Memory Task
    Tatsunori Watanabe, Xiaoxiao Chen, Keisuke Yunoki, Takuya Matsumoto, Takayuki Horinouchi, Kanami Ito, Haruki Ishida, Toru Sunagawa, Tatsuya Mima, Hikari Kirimoto
    Neuroscience.2023; 517: 50.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of stretching exercises versus transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on task performance, kinematic and electroencephalography (EEG) spectrum in subjects with slump posture: a study protocol
    Zahra Abdollahzade, Mohammad Reza Hadian, Roya Khanmohammadi, Saeed Talebian
    Trials.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task
    Adrienn Holczer, Teodóra Vékony, Péter Klivényi, Anita Must
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous fMRI and tDCS for Enhancing Training of Flight Tasks
    Jesse A. Mark, Hasan Ayaz, Daniel E. Callan
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(7): 1024.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and Factors Affecting Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Systematic Review
    Rabeet Tariq, Bhavya Kansal, Rameen Shaikh, Shria Datta, Harsh Anadkat, Seema Bista
    Current Alzheimer Research.2023; 20(4): 250.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation on working memory and task-related EEG in major depressive disorder
    O.W. Murphy, K.E. Hoy, D. Wong, N.W. Bailey, P.B. Fitzgerald, R.A. Segrave
    Brain and Cognition.2023; 173: 106105.     CrossRef
  • Inhibitory Control in Young Healthy Adults – a tDCS Study
    O LASKOV, N BIAČKOVÁ, Z STUCHLÍKOVÁ, L KOSTÝLKOVÁ, M KLÍROVÁ
    Physiological Research.2023; 72(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Electric Field Strength From Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Determines Degree of Working Memory Response: A Potential Application of Reverse-Calculation Modeling?
    Kevin A. Caulfield, Aprinda Indahlastari, Nicole R. Nissim, James W. Lopez, Holly H. Fleischmann, Adam J. Woods, Mark S. George
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2022; 25(4): 578.     CrossRef
  • Speech Changes After Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Individuals Diagnosed With Parkinson's Disease
    Ciara Leydon, Kaitlin Brooks, Guanchao Feng, David T. Hsu, Guy Schwartz, Renee Fabus
    Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.2022; 7(2): 347.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Listening to Preferred Music Alters Cortical Speech Processing in Older Adults
    Gavin M. Bidelman, Ricky Chow, Alix Noly-Gandon, Jennifer D. Ryan, Karen L. Bell, Rose Rizzi, Claude Alain
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Executive Function Training Impact on Communication? A Randomized Controlled tDCS Study on Post-Stroke Aphasia
    Francesca Pisano, Alessio Manfredini, Andrea Castellano, Carlo Caltagirone, Paola Marangolo
    Brain Sciences.2022; 12(9): 1265.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Effect of Direct Transcranial Electrical Stimulation of Motor and Vision Cortex on Working Memory and Motor Performance in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder
    fariba jazini, mahmood sheikh
    The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam.2022; 10(3): 1.     CrossRef
  • Modulation of auditory temporal processing, speech in noise perception, auditory-verbal memory, and reading efficiency by anodal tDCS in children with dyslexia
    Vida Rahimi, Ghassem Mohammadkhani, Javad Alaghband Rad, Seyyedeh Zohre Mousavi, Mohammad Ehsan Khalili
    Neuropsychologia.2022; 177: 108427.     CrossRef
  • Shocking advantage! Improving digital game performance using non-invasive brain stimulation
    Maximilian A. Friehs, Martin Dechant, Sarah Vedress, Christian Frings, Regan L. Mandryk
    International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.2021; 148: 102582.     CrossRef
  • The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on executive functioning in healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nina S. de Boer, Renée S. Schluter, Joost G. Daams, Ysbrand D. van der Werf, Anna E. Goudriaan, Ruth J. van Holst
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2021; 125: 122.     CrossRef
  • The effects of offline and online prefrontal vs parietal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on verbal and spatial working memory
    Marko Živanović, Dunja Paunović, Uroš Konstantinović, Katarina Vulić, Jovana Bjekić, Saša R. Filipović
    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.2021; 179: 107398.     CrossRef
  • Using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to investigate why faces are and are not special
    Ciro Civile, Samantha Quaglia, Emika Waguri, Maddy Ward, Rossy McLaren, I. P. L. McLaren
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Could tDCS Be a Potential Performance-Enhancing Tool for Acute Neurocognitive Modulation in eSports? A Perspective Review
    Sergio Machado, Bruno Travassos, Diogo S. Teixeira, Filipe Rodrigues, Luis Cid, Diogo Monteiro
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(7): 3678.     CrossRef
  • Stimulation of the dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex improves working memory and planning
    Puladi Farzaneh, Bagheri Masood, Ghasem Askarizadeh, Afsaneh Moradi
    Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An interdisciplinary journal.2021; 25(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with listening to preferred music on memory in older adults
    Ricky Chow, Alix Noly-Gandon, Aline Moussard, Jennifer D. Ryan, Claude Alain
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: A novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling
    Miles Wischnewski, Kathleen E. Mantell, Alexander Opitz
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2021; 130: 147.     CrossRef
  • Combining proactive transcranial stimulation and cardiac biofeedback to substantially manage harmful stress effects
    Sophie Schlatter, Aymeric Guillot, Laura Schmidt, Mathilde Mura, Robin Trama, Franck Di Rienzo, Marc Lilot, Ursula Debarnot
    Brain Stimulation.2021; 14(5): 1384.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Working Memory Training to Address Language Impairments in Aphasia: A Case Study
    Despina Kranou-Economidou, Maria Kambanaros, Enzo Emanuele
    Behavioural Neurology.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Electrify your Game! Anodal tDCS Increases the Resistance to Head Fakes in Basketball
    Maximilian A. Friehs, Iris Güldenpenning, Christian Frings, Matthias Weigelt
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.2020; 4(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and symptoms in Chinese patients with schizophrenia✰
    Robert C. Smith, Wei Li MD, Yiran Wang, Jiangling Jiang, JiJun Wang, Victoria Szabo, Robert Faull, Hua Jin, John M Davis, Chunbo Li
    Psychiatry Research.2020; 284: 112617.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing spatial reasoning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex
    Julia Wertheim, Lorenza S. Colzato, Michael A. Nitsche, Marco Ragni
    Experimental Brain Research.2020; 238(1): 181.     CrossRef
  • Time estimation exposure modifies cognitive aspects and cortical activity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder adults
    Rhailana Medeiros Fontes, Victor Marinho, Valécia Carvalho, Kaline Rocha, Francisco Magalhães, Iris Moura, Pedro Ribeiro, Bruna Velasques, Mauricio Cagy, Daya S. Gupta, Victor Hugo Bastos, Ariel Soares Teles, Silmar Teixeira
    International Journal of Neuroscience.2020; 130(10): 999.     CrossRef
  • Effects of theta burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on language switching – A behavioral and ERP study
    Maria I. Pestalozzi, Jean-Marie Annoni, René M. Müri, Lea B. Jost
    Brain and Language.2020; 205: 104775.     CrossRef
  • A Neuroergonomics Approach to Mental Workload, Engagement and Human Performance
    Frédéric Dehais, Alex Lafont, Raphaëlle Roy, Stephen Fairclough
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of prefrontal tDCS on resting brain fMRI graph measures in Alcohol Use Disorders: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.
    Bharath Holla, Jitendriya Biswal, Vinutha Ramesh, Venkataram Shivakumar, Rose Dawn Bharath, Vivek Benegal, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Prabhat Kumar Chand, Pratima Murthy
    Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.2020; 102: 109950.     CrossRef
  • Combined and Isolated Effects of Acute Exercise and Brain Stimulation on Executive Function in Healthy Young Adults
    Erika K. Hussey, Eduardo B. Fontes, Nathan Ward, Daniel R. Westfall, Shih-Chun Kao, Arthur F. Kramer, Charles H. Hillman
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(5): 1410.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Left Dlpfc on Mother Tongue and Second Language Production In Late Bilinguals: A Behavioral and ERP Study
    Lea B. Jost, Maria I. Pestalozzi, Dario Cazzoli, Michael Mouthon, René M. Müri, Jean-Marie Annoni
    Brain Topography.2020; 33(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • Effects of an APOE Promoter Polymorphism on Fronto-Parietal Functional Connectivity During Nondemented Aging
    Qirui Zhang, Lingli Wu, Chao Du, Kai Xu, Jinping Sun, Junying Zhang, He Li, Xin Li
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • tDCS Anodic Stimulation of Left Hemisphere DLPFC Regulates Hot Executive Performance
    Farzaneh Pouladi, Masood Bagheri, Ghasem Askarizadeh
    The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam.2020; 8(4): 39.     CrossRef
  • BRAINSTORMING: A study protocol for a randomised double-blind clinical trial to assess the impact of concurrent brain stimulation (tDCS) and working memory training on cognitive performance in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI)
    Sara Assecondi, Rong Hu, Gail Eskes, Michelle Read, Chris Griffiths, Kim Shapiro
    BMC Psychology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Searching for the inner self: evidence against a direct dependence of the self-prioritization effect on the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex
    Sarah Schäfer, Christian Frings
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(1): 247.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Acute Aerobic Exercise and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Cognitive Functions and Their Potential Synergies
    Fabian Steinberg, Nils Henrik Pixa, Felipe Fregni
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New information on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on n-back task performance
    Nira Mashal, Shlomit Metzuyanim-Gorelick
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(5): 1315.     CrossRef
  • Momentary lapse of control: A cognitive continuum approach to understanding and mitigating perseveration in human error
    Frédéric Dehais, Helen M. Hodgetts, Mickael Causse, Julia Behrend, Gautier Durantin, Sébastien Tremblay
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2019; 100: 252.     CrossRef
  • The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on multitasking performance and oculometrics
    Justin M. Nelson, Chandler A. Phillips, R. Andy McKinley, Lindsey K. McIntire, Chuck Goodyear, Lanie Monforton
    Military Psychology.2019; 31(3): 212.     CrossRef
  • Effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study
    Jaesub Park, Yoonkyung Oh, Kyungmi Chung, Kwang Joon Kim, Chang Oh Kim, Jin Young Park
    Trials.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing the Role of the Left Dorsal Frontal Cortex in Working Memory Guidance: Attentional or Mnemonic? A Neurostimulation Study
    José Bourbon-Teles, David Soto
    Neuroscience.2019; 411: 140.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation on prefrontal and parietal areas enhances motor imagery
    Yousef Moghadas Tabrizi, Meysam Yavari, Shahnaz Shahrbanian, Hassan Gharayagh Zandi
    NeuroReport.2019; 30(9): 653.     CrossRef
  • FV 28 tDCS and semantic memory: speeding up word recognition in older adults
    L.S. Balduin-Philipps, S. Weiss, H.M. Müller
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2019; 130(8): e135.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the prefrontal cortex on working memory: A cluster analysis approach
    Antonio Luque-Casado, Noa Fogelson, Eliseo Iglesias-Soler, Miguel Fernandez-del-Olmo
    Behavioural Brain Research.2019; 375: 112144.     CrossRef
  • Testing the role of cognitive inhibition in physical endurance using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over the prefrontal cortex
    Gauthier Denis, Raphael Zory, Rémi Radel
    Human Movement Science.2019; 67: 102507.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Improves Inhibitory Control and Endurance Performance in Healthy Individuals
    L. Angius, E. Santarnecchi, A. Pascual-Leone, S.M. Marcora
    Neuroscience.2019; 419: 34.     CrossRef
  • Modulation of Emotional Conflict Processing by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-TDCS)
    Maria Kuehne, Katarina Schmidt, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Tino Zaehle
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex: a Review of its Role on Cognitive Functions
    Bakhtiar Moslemi, Masoumeh Azmodeh, Mahmoud Tabatabaei, Marzieh Alivandi Vafa
    The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam.2019; 8(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • What is difficult for you can be easy for me. Effects of increasing individual task demand on prefrontal lateralization: A tDCS study
    Alessandra Vergallito, Leonor J. Romero Lauro, Rolando Bonandrini, Laura Zapparoli, Laura Danelli, Manuela Berlingeri
    Neuropsychologia.2018; 109: 283.     CrossRef
  • Using transcranial direct current stimulation to improve verbal working memory: A detailed review of the methodology
    Roanne Hurley, Liana Machado
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.2018; 40(8): 790.     CrossRef
  • No effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on short‐term memory
    Jing Wang, Jian‐Bing Wen, Xiao‐Li Li
    CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.2018; 24(1): 58.     CrossRef
  • Single session tDCS over the left DLPFC disrupts interference processing
    Christian Frings, Thorsten Brinkmann, Maximilian A. Friehs, Tim van Lipzig
    Brain and Cognition.2018; 120: 1.     CrossRef
  • tDCS Stimulation of the dlPFC Selectively Moderates the Detrimental Impact of Emotion on Analytical Reasoning
    Bastien Trémolière, Véronique Maheux-Caron, Jean-François Lepage, Isabelle Blanchette
    Frontiers in Psychology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mindfulness-based training with transcranial direct current stimulation modulates neuronal resource allocation in working memory: A randomized pilot study with a nonequivalent control group
    Michael A. Hunter, Gregory Lieberman, Brian A. Coffman, Michael C. Trumbo, Mikaela L. Armenta, Charles S.H. Robinson, Matthew A. Bezdek, Anthony J. O'Sickey, Aaron P. Jones, Victoria Romero, Seth Elkin-Frankston, Sean Gaurino, Leonard Eusebi, Eric H. Schu
    Heliyon.2018; 4(7): e00685.     CrossRef
  • Dorsolateral Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Language Processing but Does Not Facilitate Overt Second Language Word Production
    Narges Radman, Juliane Britz, Karin Buetler, Brendan S. Weekes, Lucas Spierer, Jean-Marie Annoni
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Lexical Access in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia
    Maria I. Pestalozzi, Marie Di Pietro, Chrisovalandou Martins Gaytanidis, Lucas Spierer, Armin Schnider, Leila Chouiter, Françoise Colombo, Jean-Marie Annoni, Lea B. Jost
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2018; 32(10): 913.     CrossRef
  • Effects of prefrontal bipolar and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory in healthy adults
    Aron T. Hill, Nigel C. Rogasch, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Kate E. Hoy
    NeuroImage.2017; 152: 142.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED: l-Tyrosine administration modulates the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in healthy humans
    Bryant J. Jongkees, Roberta Sellaro, Christian Beste, Michael A. Nitsche, Simone Kühn, Lorenza S. Colzato
    Cortex.2017; 90: 103.     CrossRef
  • Individual Differences and Long-term Consequences of tDCS-augmented Cognitive Training
    Benjamin Katz, Jacky Au, Martin Buschkuehl, Tessa Abagis, Chelsea Zabel, Susanne M. Jaeggi, John Jonides
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2017; 29(9): 1498.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading: A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants
    Samuel J. Westwood, Cristina Romani
    Neuropsychologia.2017; 104: 234.     CrossRef
  • Positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder A pilot randomized controlled study
    Carolina Tosetto Cachoeira, Douglas Teixeira Leffa, Suzana Doneda Mittelstadt, Lorenna Sena Teixeira Mendes, Andre R. Brunoni, Jairo Vinicius Pinto, Vtor Blazius, Vitoria Machado, Claiton Henrique Dotto Bau, Luis Augusto Rohde, Eugenio Horacio Grevet, Ped
    Psychiatry Research.2017; 247: 28.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functional Capacity in Schizophrenia: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zui Narita, Takuma Inagawa, Kazushi Maruo, Kazuki Sueyoshi, Tomiki Sumiyoshi
    Frontiers in Psychiatry.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • tDCS-Induced Effects on Executive Functioning and Their Cognitive Mechanisms: a Review
    Tilo Strobach, Daria Antonenko
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.2017; 1(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Controlling the Anchoring Effect through Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
    Jianbiao Li, Xile Yin, Dahui Li, Xiaoli Liu, Guangrong Wang, Liang Qu
    Frontiers in Psychology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Possible Facilitative Effects of Repeated Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Functional Outcome 1 Month Later in Schizophrenia: An Open Trial
    Zui Narita, Takuma Inagawa, Kazuki Sueyoshi, Crystal Lin, Tomiki Sumiyoshi
    Frontiers in Psychiatry.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Right prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation enhances multi-day savings in sensorimotor adaptation
    Rachael D. Seidler, Brittany S. Gluskin, Brian Greeley
    Journal of Neurophysiology.2017; 117(1): 429.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation versus caffeine as a fatigue countermeasure
    Lindsey K. McIntire, R. Andy McKinley, Justin M. Nelson, Chuck Goodyear
    Brain Stimulation.2017; 10(6): 1070.     CrossRef
  • Efeito da estimulação transcraniana por corrente continua (ETCC) no córtex pré-frontal dorsolateral na percepção de tempo em contexto neutro
    Felipe Oliveira
    Universitas Psychologica.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Healthy Working Memory?: A Meta-analytic Review
    Lauren E. Mancuso, Irena P. Ilieva, Roy H. Hamilton, Martha J. Farah
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2016; 28(8): 1063.     CrossRef
  • Uncertainty and Promise: the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory
    Tiffany K. Jantz, Ben Katz, Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
    Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports.2016; 3(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Findings From Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Populations
    Aron T. Hill, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Kate E. Hoy
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(2): 197.     CrossRef
  • The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on cognitive inhibition
    Shlomit Metzuyanim-Gorlick, Nira Mashal
    Experimental Brain Research.2016; 234(6): 1537.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing switching abilities: Improving practice effect by stimulating the dorsolateral pre frontal cortex
    Y. Tayeb, M. Lavidor
    Neuroscience.2016; 313: 92.     CrossRef
  • Cognitive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression: Results from the SELECT-TDCS trial and insights for further clinical trials
    André Russowsky Brunoni, Gabriel Tortella, Isabela Martins Benseñor, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, André Ferrer Carvalho, Felipe Fregni
    Journal of Affective Disorders.2016; 202: 46.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced working memory performance via transcranial direct current stimulation: The possibility of near and far transfer
    Michael C. Trumbo, Laura E. Matzen, Brian A. Coffman, Michael A. Hunter, Aaron P. Jones, Charles S.H. Robinson, Vincent P. Clark
    Neuropsychologia.2016; 93: 85.     CrossRef
  • Anodal tDCS to Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Facilitates Performance for Novice Jazz Improvisers but Hinders Experts
    David S. Rosen, Brian Erickson, Youngmoo E. Kim, Daniel Mirman, Roy H. Hamilton, John Kounios
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex modulates error‐induced behavioral adjustments
    Farshad A. Mansouri, Daniel J. Fehring, Azadeh Feizpour, Alexandra Gaillard, Marcello G.P. Rosa, Ramesh Rajan, Shapour Jaberzadeh, Gregor Thut
    European Journal of Neuroscience.2016; 44(2): 1856.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Language Production of Healthy Adults and Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease
    Amy Vogel-Eyny, Elizabeth E. Galletta, Loraine K. Obler
    Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.2016; 1(2): 138.     CrossRef
  • tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics
    Vânia de Aguiar, Caterina Laura Paolazzi, Gabriele Miceli
    Cortex.2015; 63: 296.     CrossRef
  • The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
    Andrea M. Loftus, Ozgur Yalcin, Frank D. Baughman, Eric J. Vanman, Martin S. Hagger
    Brain and Behavior.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
    Jared Cooney Horvath, Jason D. Forte, Olivia Carter
    Brain Stimulation.2015; 8(3): 535.     CrossRef
  • Language and Memory Improvements following tDCS of Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex
    Erika K. Hussey, Nathan Ward, Kiel Christianson, Arthur F. Kramer, Andrea Antal
    PLOS ONE.2015; 10(11): e0141417.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing decision-making and cognitive impulse control with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): A randomized and sham-controlled exploratory study
    Julien Ouellet, Alexander McGirr, Frederique Van den Eynde, Fabrice Jollant, Martin Lepage, Marcelo T. Berlim
    Journal of Psychiatric Research.2015; 69: 27.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognition, symptoms, and smoking in schizophrenia: A randomized controlled study
    Robert C. Smith, Sylvia Boules, Sanela Mattiuz, Mary Youssef, Russell H. Tobe, Henry Sershen, Abel Lajtha, Karen Nolan, Revital Amiaz, John M. Davis
    Schizophrenia Research.2015; 168(1-2): 260.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test
    Kristin K. Sellers, Juliann M. Mellin, Caroline M. Lustenberger, Michael R. Boyle, Won Hee Lee, Angel V. Peterchev, Flavio Fröhlich
    Behavioural Brain Research.2015; 290: 32.     CrossRef
  • Longitudinal Neurostimulation in Older Adults Improves Working Memory
    Kevin T. Jones, Jaclyn A. Stephens, Mahtab Alam, Marom Bikson, Marian E. Berryhill, Andrea Antal
    PLOS ONE.2015; 10(4): e0121904.     CrossRef
  • Double dissociation of working memory and attentional processes in smokers and non-smokers with and without nicotine
    Jessica Grundey, Rosa Amu, Géza Gergely Ambrus, Georgi Batsikadze, Walter Paulus, Michael A. Nitsche
    Psychopharmacology.2015; 232(14): 2491.     CrossRef
  • Modulating Hippocampal Plasticity withIn VivoBrain Stimulation
    Joyce G. Rohan, Kim A. Carhuatanta, Shawn M. McInturf, Molly K. Miklasevich, Ryan Jankord
    The Journal of Neuroscience.2015; 35(37): 12824.     CrossRef
  • The Uncertain Outcome of Prefrontal tDCS
    Sara Tremblay, Jean-François Lepage, Alex Latulipe-Loiselle, Felipe Fregni, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Hugo Théoret
    Brain Stimulation.2014; 7(6): 773.     CrossRef
  • Connectivity between Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Supplementary Motor Area Predicts After-Effects of Right Frontal Cathodal tDCS on Picture Naming Speed
    Charlotte Rosso, R. Valabregue, C. Arbizu, S. Ferrieux, P. Vargas, F. Humbert, Y. Attal, A. Messé, C. Zavanone, S. Meunier, L. Cohen, C. Delmaire, A. Thielscher, D.M. Herz, H.R. Siebner, Y. Samson, S. Lehéricy
    Brain Stimulation.2014; 7(1): 122.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Modulation of Executive Function in Health and Disease
    Rani A. Sarkis, Navneet Kaur, Joan A. Camprodon
    Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports.2014; 1(2): 74.     CrossRef
  • Effects of tDCS on executive function in Parkinson's disease
    Deniz Doruk, Zachary Gray, Gabriela L. Bravo, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Felipe Fregni
    Neuroscience Letters.2014; 582: 27.     CrossRef
  • Modulation of Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Motor Network by Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation
    Chandler Sours, Gad Alon, Steve Roys, Rao P. Gullapalli
    Brain Connectivity.2014; 4(3): 157.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy and Confidence of Visual Short-Term Memory Do Not Go Hand-In-Hand: Behavioral and Neural Dissociations
    Silvia Bona, Juha Silvanto, Katsumi Watanabe
    PLoS ONE.2014; 9(3): e90808.     CrossRef
  • Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder
    Janaina F. Oliveira, Tamires A. Zanão, Leandro Valiengo, Paulo A. Lotufo, Isabela M. Benseñor, Felipe Fregni, André R. Brunoni
    Neuroscience Letters.2013; 537: 60.     CrossRef
  • Behavioral effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence
    Morgana Croce da Silva, Catarine Lima Conti, Jaisa Klauss, Luana Gaburro Alves, Henrique Mineiro do Nascimento Cavalcante, Felipe Fregni, Michael A. Nitsche, Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios
    Journal of Physiology-Paris.2013; 107(6): 493.     CrossRef
  • 6,879 View
  • 111 Download
  • 110 Crossref
Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function
Min Kyun Sohn, Bong Ok Kim, Hyun Tak Song
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(1):1-7.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.1
Objective

To evaluate motor excitability and hand function on the non-dominant side according to the polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex in a healthy person.

Method

tDCS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 15 minutes at an intensity of 1 mA in 28 healthy right-handed adults. Subjects were divided randomly into four groups: an anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, a cathodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, an anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere group, and a sham group. We measured the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the abductor pollicis brevis and Jabsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT) in the non-dominant hand prior to and following tDCS. All study procedures were done under double-blind design.

Results

There was a significant increase in the MEP amplitude and a significant improvement in the JTT in the non-dominant hand following anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere (p<0.05). But there was no change in JTT and a significant decrease in the MEP amplitude in the non-dominant hand following cathodal tDCS on the non-dominant hemisphere and anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere.

Conclusion

Non-dominant hand function is improved by increased excitability of the motor cortex. Although motor cortex excitability is decreased in a healthy person, non-dominant hand function is maintained. A homeostatic mechanism in the brain might therefore be involved in preserving this function. Further studies are warranted to examine brain functions to clarify this mechanism.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere
    Erik W. Wilkins, Richard J. Young, Daniel Houston, Eric Kawana, Edgar Lopez Mora, Meghana S. Sunkara, Zachary A. Riley, Brach Poston
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(7): 694.     CrossRef
  • Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude in Motor Behavior-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Systematic Review
    Jennifer L. Ryan, Emily Eng, Darcy L. Fehlings, F. Virginia Wright, Danielle E. Levac, Deryk S. Beal
    Journal of Motor Behavior.2023; 55(3): 313.     CrossRef
  • Hemispheric Differences of 1 Hz rTMS over Motor and Premotor Cortex in Modulation of Neural Processing and Hand Function
    Jitka Veldema, Dennis Alexander Nowak, Kathrin Bösl, Alireza Gharabaghi
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • tDCS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the trained hand enhances cross-limb transfer in older adults
    Elisabeth Kaminski, Tom Maudrich, Pauline Bassler, Madeleine Ordnung, Arno Villringer, Patrick Ragert
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhanced Motor Learning on Robotic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Maps in Children
    Adrianna Giuffre, Ephrem Zewdie, James G. Wrightson, Lauran Cole, Helen L. Carlson, Hsing-Ching Kuo, Ali Babwani, Adam Kirton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Audiological Practice: The Gaps to Be Filled
    Mujda Nooristani, Thomas Augereau, Karina Moïn-Darbari, Benoit-Antoine Bacon, François Champoux
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper-Limb Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ronak Patel, James Ashcroft, Ashish Patel, Hutan Ashrafian, Adam J. Woods, Harsimrat Singh, Ara Darzi, Daniel Richard Leff
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols
    Jared Cooney Horvath, Olivia Carter, Jason D. Forte
    Neuropsychologia.2016; 91: 544.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization
    Bernadette T. Gillick, Adam Kirton, Jason B. Carmel, Preet Minhas, Marom Bikson
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control
    Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Reza Shadmehr
    Experimental Brain Research.2014; 232(11): 3379.     CrossRef
  • Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age
    Kirstin-Friederike Heise, Martina Niehoff, J.-F. Feldheim, Gianpiero Liuzzi, Christian Gerloff, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,882 View
  • 52 Download
  • 11 Crossref
The Factors Associated with Good Responses to Speech Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Aphasic Patients
Il-Young Jung, Jong Youb Lim, Eun Kyoung Kang, Hae Min Sohn, Nam-Jong Paik
Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(4):460-469.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.460
Objective

To determine factors associated with good responses to speech therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in aphasic patients after stroke.

Method

The language function was evaluated using Korean version of Western aphasia battery (K-WAB) before and after speech therapy with tDCS in 37 stroke patients. Patients received speech therapy for 30 minutes over 2 to 3 weeks (10 sessions) while the cathodal tDCS was performed to the Brodmann area 45 with 1 mA for 20 minutes. We compared the improvement of aphasia quotient % (AQ%) between two evaluation times according to age, sex, days after onset, stroke type, aphasia type, brain lesion confirmed by magnetic resonance image and initial severity of aphasia. The factors related with good responses were also checked.

Results

AQ% improved from pre- to post-therapy (14.94±6.73%, p<0.001). AQ% improvement was greater in patients with less severe, fluent type of aphasia who received treatment before 30 days since stroke was developed (p<0.05). The adjusted logistic regression model revealed that patients with hemorrhagic stroke were more likely to achieve good responses (odds ratio=4.897, p<0.05) relative to infarction. Initial severity over 10% in AQ% was also found to be significantly associated with good improvement (odds ratio=8.618, p<0.05).

Conclusion

Speech therapy with tDCS was established as a treatment tool for aphasic patients after stroke. Lower initial severity was associated with good responses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evidence of physiological changes associated with single-session pre-frontal tDCS: a pilot study
    Hannah N. Rembrandt, Ellyn A. Riley
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Aphasia severity and factors predicting language recovery in the chronic stage of stroke
    Sneha Rozelena Anthony, Praveena Babu, Avanthi Paplikar
    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review
    Ellen E. R. Williams, Sabrina Sghirripa, Nigel C. Rogasch, Brenton Hordacre, Stacie Attrill
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2024; 46(17): 3802.     CrossRef
  • Combining computer‐based rehabilitative approach with tDCS for recovering of aphasia: Implications from a single case study
    Marianna Contrada, Federica Scarfone, Antonella Iozzi, Simone Carozzo, Martina Vatrano, Maria Grazia Nicoletta, Giuseppe Nudo, Maria Quintieri, Paolo Tonin, Antonio Cerasa
    Clinical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction models of the aphasia severity after stroke by lesion load of cortical language areas and white matter tracts: An atlas-based study
    Qiwei Yu, Yan Sun, Xiaowen Ju, Tianfen Ye, Kefu Liu
    Brain Research Bulletin.2024; 217: 111074.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Subacute Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Melissa D. Stockbridge, Jordan Elm, Bonnie L. Breining, Donna C. Tippett, Rajani Sebastian, Christy Cassarly, Abeba Teklehaimanot, Leigh Ann Spell, Shannon M. Sheppard, Emilia Vitti, Kristina Ruch, Emily B. Goldberg, Catherine Kelly, Lynsey M. Keator, Jul
    Stroke.2023; 54(4): 912.     CrossRef
  • Individual Differences in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Language Therapy in Subacute Stroke
    Melissa D. Stockbridge, Jordan Elm, Abeba A. Teklehaimanot, Christy Cassarly, Leigh-Ann Spell, Julius Fridriksson, Argye E. Hillis
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2023; 37(8): 519.     CrossRef
  • Does Right-Hemispheric Anodal tDCS Enhance the Impact of Script Training in Chronic Aphasia? A Single-Subject Experimental Study
    Mathieu Figeys, Esther Sung Kim, Tammy Hopper
    Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series
    Shannon M. Sheppard, Emily B. Goldberg, Rajani Sebastian, Alexandra Walker, Erin L. Meier, Argye E. Hillis
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2022; 31(4): 1736.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy
    Sigfus Kristinsson, Dirk B. den Ouden, Chris Rorden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Jean Neils-Strunjas, Julius Fridriksson
    Journal of Stroke.2022; 24(2): 189.     CrossRef
  • Spinal or cortical direct current stimulation: Which is the best? Evidence from apraxia of speech in post-stroke aphasia
    Francesca Pisano, Carlo Caltagirone, Chiara Incoccia, Paola Marangolo
    Behavioural Brain Research.2021; 399: 113019.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation and Behavioral Training, a Promising Tool for a Tailor-Made Post-stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review
    Marina Zettin, Caterina Bondesan, Giulia Nada, Matteo Varini, Danilo Dimitri
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The potential effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on language functioning: Combining neuromodulation and behavioral intervention in aphasia
    Paola Marangolo
    Neuroscience Letters.2020; 719: 133329.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Speech-language Therapy on Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study
    Elodie Guillouët, Mélanie Cogné, Elisabeth Saverot, Nicolas Roche, Pascale Pradat-Diehl, Agnès Weill-Chounlamountry, Vanessa Ramel, Catherine Taratte, Anne-Gaëlle Lachasse, Jean-Arthur Haulot, Isabelle Vaugier, Frédéric Barbot, Philippe Azouvi, Sophie Cha
    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.2020; 26(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Stroke Recovery Across the Life Span With Noninvasive Neurostimulation
    Sean Dukelow, Adam Kirton
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 37(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and neuroimaging factors associated with aphasia severity in stroke patients: diffusion tensor imaging study
    Sekwang Lee, Yoonhye Na, Woo-Suk Tae, Sung-Bom Pyun
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neurotechnologies as tools for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke patients
    Laurijn R. Draaisma, Maximilian J. Wessel, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2020; 20(12): 1249.     CrossRef
  • Enhancement of Facilitation Training for Aphasia by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Aya S. Ihara, Akiko Miyazaki, Yukihiro Izawa, Misaki Takayama, Kozo Hanayama, Jun Tanemura
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia – Insights into plasticity of the human language network
    Gesa Hartwigsen, Dorothee Saur
    NeuroImage.2019; 190: 14.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review
    Elisa Biou, Hélène Cassoudesalle, Mélanie Cogné, Igor Sibon, Isabelle De Gabory, Patrick Dehail, Jerome Aupy, Bertrand Glize
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 62(2): 104.     CrossRef
  • High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Verb Recovery in Aphasic Patients Depending on Current Intensity
    Valentina Fiori, Michael A. Nitsche, Gabriella Cucuzza, Carlo Caltagirone, Paola Marangolo
    Neuroscience.2019; 406: 159.     CrossRef
  • Left Shifting of Language Related Activity Induced by Bihemispheric tDCS in Postacute Aphasia Following Stroke
    Sarah Feil, Peter Eisenhut, Frauke Strakeljahn, Sarah Müller, Claude Nauer, Jens Bansi, Stefan Weber, Alexandra Liebs, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Jürg Kesselring, Roman Gonzenbach, Veit Mylius
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive role of subcomponents of the left arcuate fasciculus in prognosis of aphasia after stroke
    Qiwei Yu, Hong Wang, Shuqing Li, Yanhong Dai
    Medicine.2019; 98(23): e15775.     CrossRef
  • Relative frequency and prognosis of vascular aphasia (follow-up at 3 months) in the Neurology Department of Assiut University Hospital
    Hamdy Naguib El-Tallawy, Adel Hassanein El Sayed Gad, Anwar Mohamed Ali, Manar Nasr Abd-El-Hakim
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Anodal tDCS on Articulatory Accuracy, Word Production, and Syllable Repetition in Subjects with Aphasia: A Crossover, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Camila Vila-Nova, Pedro H. Lucena, Rita Lucena, Giulia Armani-Franceschi, Fernanda Q. Campbell
    Neurology and Therapy.2019; 8(2): 411.     CrossRef
  • Changes in Language Function and Recovery-Related Prognostic Factors in First-Ever Left Hemispheric Ischemic Stroke
    Kyung Ah Kim, Jung Soo Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Deog Young Kim, Yong-Il Shin, Soo-Yeon Kim, Young Taek Kim, Sung Hyun Kang, Ji Yoo Choi, Yun-Hee Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 43(6): 625.     CrossRef
  • Cortico-Muscular Coherence Modulated by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke
    Shi-Chun Bao, Wan-Wa Wong, Thomas Wai Hong Leung, Kai-Yu Tong
    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.2019; 27(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes
    Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Paola Marangolo, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Sven Bestmann, Elisabeth Galletta, Helena Knotkova, Marom Bikson
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(2): 310.     CrossRef
  • The prognosis for post-stroke aphasia
    V. V. Alferova, V. M. Shklovskij, E. G. Ivanova, G. V. Ivanov, L. A. Mayorova, A. G. Petrushevsky, S. V. Kuptsova, A. B. Guekht
    Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova.2018; 118(4): 20.     CrossRef
  • The rehabilitative effects on written language of a combined language and parietal dual-tDCS treatment in a stroke case
    Barbara De Tommaso, Alessandro Piedimonte, Marcella M. Caglio, Federico D'Agata, Marcello Campagnoli, Laura Orsi, Simona Raimondo, Sergio Vighetti, Paolo Mortara, Giuseppe Massazza, Lorenzo Pinessi
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2017; 27(6): 904.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Andrea Antal, Samar S. Ayache, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Filippo Cogiamanian, Maria Cotelli, Dirk De Ridder, Roberta Ferrucci, Berthold Langguth, Paola Marangolo, Veit Mylius, Michael A. Nitsche, Frank Padberg, Ulrich Pa
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Where are aphasia theory and management “headed”?
    Donna C. Tippett, Argye E. Hillis
    F1000Research.2017; 6: 1038.     CrossRef
  • The role of the right hemisphere in the recovery of stroke-related aphasia: A systematic review
    Elissa-Marie Cocquyt, Lisa De Ley, Patrick Santens, John Van Borsel, Miet De Letter
    Journal of Neurolinguistics.2017; 44: 68.     CrossRef
  • Moving Beyond the Brain: Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Aphasia
    Paola Marangolo, Valentina Fiori, Jacob Shofany, Tommaso Gili, Carlo Caltagirone, Gabriella Cucuzza, Alberto Priori
    Frontiers in Neurology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Should This Patient With Global Aphasia After a Left Cerebral Stroke Be Admitted to Your Hospital‐Based Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit?
    Leroy R. Lindsay, Kirk Lercher, Michael W. O'Dell
    PM&R.2017; 9(6): 629.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-stroke and Neurodegenerative Aphasia: Parallels, Differences, and Lessons Learned
    Catherine Norise, Roy H. Hamilton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An update on medications and noninvasive brain stimulation to augment language rehabilitation in post-stroke aphasia
    Sadhvi Saxena, Argye E. Hillis
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2017; 17(11): 1091.     CrossRef
  • Modulating Human Auditory Processing by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
    Kai Heimrath, Marina Fiene, Katharina S. Rufener, Tino Zaehle
    Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Value and Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Critical Review Since 2000
    Davide Cappon, Marjan Jahanshahi, Patrizia Bisiacchi
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation for Post-Stroke Aphasia
    Zafer Keser, Gerard E. Francisco
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2016; 4(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Epidural Cortical Stimulation as a Treatment for Poststroke Aphasia
    Anne Balossier, Olivier Etard, Chloé Descat, Denis Vivien, Evelyne Emery
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2016; 30(2): 120.     CrossRef
  • Fields or flows? A comparative metaanalysis of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation to treat post-stroke aphasia
    Priyanka P. Shah-Basak, Rachel Wurzman, Juliann B. Purcell, Felix Gervits, Roy Hamilton, Roy Hamilton
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2016; 34(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in post stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia: Current knowledge and future clinical applications
    Rajani Sebastian, Kyrana Tsapkini, Donna C. Tippett, Rick Parente
    NeuroRehabilitation.2016; 39(1): 141.     CrossRef
  • Nichtinvasive Stimulationsverfahren in der Neurologie
    D. Antonenko, A. Flöel
    Der Nervenarzt.2016; 87(8): 838.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Language Treatment Enhances Functional Connectivity in the Left Hemisphere: Preliminary Data from Aphasia
    Paola Marangolo, Valentina Fiori, Umberto Sabatini, Giada De Pasquale, Carmela Razzano, Carlo Caltagirone, Tommaso Gili
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2016; 28(5): 724.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Novel Method for Enhancing Aphasia Treatment Effects
    Jennifer T. Crinion
    European Psychologist.2016; 21(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation
    Silvia Convento, Cristina Russo, Luca Zigiotto, Nadia Bolognini
    European Psychologist.2016; 21(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Use of tDCS in Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of the Behavioral Interventions Implemented With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Language Recovery
    Elizabeth E. Galletta, Peggy Conner, Amy Vogel-Eyny, Paola Marangolo
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ipsilesional and contralesional regions participate in the improvement of poststroke aphasia: a transcranial direct current stimulation study
    Vanessa Costa, Giuseppe Giglia, Filippo Brighina, Serena Indovino, Brigida Fierro
    Neurocase.2015; 21(4): 479.     CrossRef
  • Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery
    Watila M.M., Balarabe S.A.
    Journal of the Neurological Sciences.2015; 352(1-2): 12.     CrossRef
  • Update in Aphasia Research
    Donna C. Tippett
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia
    Elizabeth E. Galletta, Andrea Cancelli, Carlo Cottone, Ilaria Simonelli, Franca Tecchio, Marom Bikson, Paola Marangolo
    Brain Stimulation.2015; 8(6): 1108.     CrossRef
  • tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics
    Vânia de Aguiar, Caterina Laura Paolazzi, Gabriele Miceli
    Cortex.2015; 63: 296.     CrossRef
  • tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases
    Agnes Flöel
    NeuroImage.2014; 85: 934.     CrossRef
  • The Persistent and Broadly Modulating Effect of Inhibitory rTMS in Nonfluent Aphasic Patients
    Po-Yi Tsai, Chih-Pin Wang, James S. Ko, Yeh-Mei Chung, Ya-Wen Chang, Jian-Xiang Wang
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2014; 28(8): 779.     CrossRef
  • Broca's Area Damage is Necessary but not Sufficient to Induce After-effects of cathodal tDCS on the Unaffected Hemisphere in Post-stroke Aphasia
    C. Rosso, V. Perlbarg, R. Valabregue, C. Arbizu, S. Ferrieux, B. Alshawan, P. Vargas, A. Leger, C. Zavanone, J.C. Corvol, S. Meunier, S. Lehéricy, Y. Samson
    Brain Stimulation.2014; 7(5): 627.     CrossRef
  • Options to enhance recovery from aphasia by means of non-invasive brain stimulation and action observation therapy
    Paola Marangolo, Carlo Caltagirone
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2014; 14(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • Bihemispheric stimulation over left and right inferior frontal region enhances recovery from apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia
    Paola Marangolo, Valentina Fiori, Susanna Cipollari, Serena Campana, Carmelina Razzano, Margherita Di Paola, Giacomo Koch, Carlo Caltagirone
    European Journal of Neuroscience.2013; 38(9): 3370.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language
    A. Monti, R. Ferrucci, M. Fumagalli, F. Mameli, F. Cogiamanian, G. Ardolino, A. Priori
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.2013; 84(8): 832.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Review of Recent Advancements
    Andrea Gomez Palacio Schjetnan, Jamshid Faraji, Gerlinde A. Metz, Masami Tatsuno, Artur Luczak
    Stroke Research and Treatment.2013; 2013: 1.     CrossRef
  • 7,444 View
  • 78 Download
  • 61 Crossref
Improvement of the Working Memory by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Older Adults.
Seo, Min Ho , Park, Sung Hee , Seo, Jeong Hwan , Kim, Yun Hee , Ko, Myoung Hwan
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2011;35(2):201-206.
Objective
To investigate the short term effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in healthy older adults aged more than 65 years by means of verbal and visuospatial working memory tasks. Method Twenty four healthy older adults (14 males and 10 females, age range: 65-78 years old) were enrolled in this study. A double-blind study was conducted. The subjects underwent sham or anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (F3 in the international 10-20 EEG system). DC was delivered for 30 minutes at 2 mA with 25 cm2 saline- soaked sponge electrodes. A cathode electrode was applied to the left arm. Before and after tDCS, the subjects performed 2-back verbal working memory and visuospatial memory tasks. The rates of improvement of the accuracy and the reaction time were analyzed. Results On the 2-back verbal working memory tasks, the verbal working memory accuracy was improved in the real group compared with that of the sham group. On visuospatial working memory task, the working memory accuracy and reaction time were not improved in either the real group or the sham group. Conclusion The results showed beneficial effects of noninvasive anodal tDCS on the cognitive function in healthy older adults. We suggest that tDCS induces functional changes on the left prefrontal cortex, and it improves the age-related cognitive impairment in the healthy elderly population.
  • 2,977 View
  • 44 Download
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Dysarthria in Stroke Patients.
You, Dae Sang , Chun, Min Ho , Kim, Dae Yul , Han, Eun Young , Jung, Seung Eun
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2010;34(1):10-14.
Objective
To investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve dysarthria in stroke patients. Method: Twelve patients who developed dysarthria after acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction were included in this study. In a prospective, double blinded, randomized case control study performed between January 2007 and December 2008, six patients were randomized to anodal tDCS application and conventional speech therapy, and six patients were randomized to the sham group which received only conventional speech therapy. tDCS was delivered for 30 minutes at 2 mA with 25cm2, five times/week, for a total two weeks. The effects were assessed in maximal phonation time (MPT), alternative motion rates (AMR)-Pa, AMR-Ta, AMR-Ka, and sequential motion rates (SMR)-PaTaKa using the Multi-Media Dimension Voice Program. Results: Pre-treatment patient evaluation showed no significant difference between the two groups for all parameters. The MPT, AMR-Pa, AMR-Ta, AMR-Ka, and SMR-PaTaKa were improved pre- and post-treatment in the stimulation group, while MPT, SMR-PaTaKa were improved in the sham group (p<0.05). The AMR-Pa significantly improved in the stimulation group compared to the sham group (p<0.05). Conclusion: As these results demonstrated the beneficial effects of anodal tDCS on dysarthria, tDCS can successfully be used as a treatment modality for patients suffering from dysarthria after stroke. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2010; 34: 10-14)
  • 2,585 View
  • 145 Download
Improvement of Chronic Post-Stroke Hemiparetic Upper Limb Function after 2 Week Trascranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Kim, Deog Young , Park, Chang Il , Jung, Kang Jae , Ohn, Suk Hoon , Park, Ki Deok , Park, Jong Bum , Oh, Yun Taek
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2009;33(1):5-11.
Objective
To investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could improve the motor function of hemiparetic upper limb in chronic stroke patients through randomized double-blinded, sham-controlled study. Method: Twenty chronic post-stroke hemiparetic patients participated in this study. They were randomly assigned into either tDCS or sham group. Anodal tDCS was delivered on lesional primary motor cortex for 20 minutes in tDCS group and 30 seconds in sham group. Just after stimulation, both groups performed the shaping exercise for 30 minutes. Total 10 stimulation sessions (5 session/week for 2 weeks) were administered. Fugl-Meyer motor assessment, box and block test, grasp strength and FIM were assessed before stimulation, after 1 week of stimulation, after 2 weeks of stimulation, and 2 weeks after stimulation. Results: The upper extremity score of Fugl-Meyer motor assessment and box and block test improved significantly in tDCS group compared to sham group (p<0.05). Their improvement lasted significantly for 2 week after stimulation. However, FIM, lower extremity score of Fugl-Meyer motor assessment and grasp power did not improved significantly in tDCS group compared to sham group. Conclusion: tDCS can improve the motor function of hemiparetic upper limb in chronic post-stroke patients, and the effects lasted after stimulation. tDCS may be used as an additional tool for stroke rehabilitation. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2009; 33: 5-11)
  • 1,657 View
  • 53 Download
Improvement of Apraxia and Hand Function with Transcranial Direct Current Brain Polarization in Patients with Corticobasal Degeneration.
Ko, Myoung Hwan , Wassermann, Eric M , Seo, Jeong Hwan , Kim, Yun Hee
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(3):278-282.
Objective
To see whether anodal direct current (DC) polarization of the inferior parietal cortex (IPC) and the primary sensorimotor area (SM1) in corticobasal degeneration (CBD) patients leads to improvement of praxia and finger motion. Method: Twelve patients with CBD were enrolled. This single blind crossover study had three arms, anodal DC to IPC, anodal DC to SM1, and shame polarization on occipital area. DC was delivered for 40 minute at 2 mA with 25 cm2 sponge electrodes. Before and 20 min after the start of polarization, we performed the test of oral and limb apraxia (TOLA), finger tapping frequency, and grooved pegboard test. Results: The total score of TOLA was increased 5.4±2.3% after anodal DC to IPC. The scores of limb apraxia and picture gesture subtests of TOLA, not of oral apraxia subtest, increased significantly after anodal DC to IPC compared to sham DC polarization (p<0.05). In anodal DC to SM1 group, the finger tapping frequency increased 15.5±14.1%, which was significantly greater than in sham group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results showed beneficial effects of anodal DC polarization on apraxia and hand function in CBD patients. In addition, these effects for apraxia and hand movement were dependent on their stimulation sites of brain. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2007; 31: 278-282)
  • 1,664 View
  • 22 Download
TOP