• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Superficial peroneal"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Superficial peroneal"

Original Articles
Nerve Conduction Study of the Superficial Peroneal Sensory Distal Branches in Koreans
Yeong-A Ko, Young Jin Ko, Hye Won Kim, Seong Hoon Lim, Byung Woo Yang, Sung-Hee Jung, Sun Im
Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(4):548-556.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.548
Objective

To perform nerve conduction studies of the four branches of the superficial peroneal nerves to determine normal values and anatomic variations in Koreans.

Method

Antidromic sensory nerve conduction studies of the four distal branches were performed on 70 healthy subjects (100 feet). We applied electrical stimulation at the midpoint of medial and lateral malleoli for the medial dorsal cutaneous nerve (MDCN), and at the lateral 1/4 point between the medial and lateral malleoli for the 2 branches of the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve (IDCN).

Results

Reference values (mean±SD) of the onset/ peak latency (ms)/ sensory action potential amplitude (µV) for the two branches of the MDCN and for the first branch of the IDCN were 2.2±0.3/2.9±0.3/9.2±3.1, 2.2±0.3/2.8±0.3/9.1±3.0 and 2.3±0.4/2.9±0.3/8.5±2.8, respectively. For the second IDCN branch, the reference values were 2.3±0.4/3.0±0.4/7.1±2.6 but anomalous sural innervation was also found. Three types of IDCN innervations to the fourth interdigital web space were detected. In type I, the fourth interdigital webspace was innervated solely by the IDCN, whereas in type II, it was innervated by both the IDCN and distal sural nerve. In type III, it was solely innervated by the distal sural nerve.

Conclusion

The results of this study show the reference values of the distal sensory branches of the superficial peroneal nerve, and provide information on the variant innervations to the fourth interdigital web space.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Compound Nerve Action Potential of the Distal Superficial Peroneal Nerve: Definition of a New Method and Normative Data
    Memet Aslanyavrusu, Fahrettin Ege, Gülhan Sarıçam Yapar
    Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology.2025; 42(3): 94.     CrossRef
  • Association between sensory nerve action potential and lumbar dorsal root ganglion area
    Jaewon Beom, Sujin Kim, Hoon Chang Suh, Don-Kyu Kim, Si Hyun Kang, Shi-Uk Lee, Sang Yoon Lee
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2019; 59: 37.     CrossRef
  • Variations in the distal branches of the superficial fibular sensory nerve
    Shoji Hemmi, Katsumi Kurokawa, Taiji Nagai, Ryutaro Kushida, Toshio Okamoto, Tatsufumi Murakami, Yoshihide Sunada
    Muscle & Nerve.2017; 55(1): 74.     CrossRef
  • Variations in sural nerve formation pattern and distribution on the dorsum of the foot
    Su Kyoung Jeon, Doo‐Jin Paik, Young‐Il Hwang
    Clinical Anatomy.2017; 30(4): 525.     CrossRef
  • Inhibitory effect of IL-17 on neural stem cell proliferation and neural cell differentiation
    Zichen Li, Ke Li, Lin Zhu, Quancheng Kan, Yaping Yan, Priyanka Kumar, Hui Xu, Abdolmohamad Rostami, Guang-Xian Zhang
    BMC Immunology.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 16,698 View
  • 171 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Objective
To find the correlation between dorsal root ganglion location and abnormal superficial peroneal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) response in L5 radiculopathy. Method: This retrospective study included thirty-three patients with unilateral L5 radiculopathy, who had no peripheral polyneuropathy, focal neuropathy or other metabolic disease and were under 60 years. 33 patients were classified to two groups: group I with an abnormal superficial peroneal SNAP response and group II with a normal superficial peroneal SNAP response. Using axial view of MRI, the location of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of the study group was classified into intraspinal, intraforaminal and extraforaminal space. Results: In group I, 71% of L4 dorsal root ganglion was located in intraforaminal space, and 14% in extraforaminal space and 64% of L5 DRG was in intraforaminal space and 14% in intraspinal. In Group II, 42% of L4 DRG was located in intraforaminal space, and 58% in extraforaminal and 26% of L5 DRG in intraforaminal space and 63% in extraforaminal space. Group I subjects were more located in the intraforaminal space than Group II subjects (p<0.05). Conclusion: In spite of belief that "radiculopathy involves the nerve root proximal to DRG", the significant proportion of dorsal root ganglion was located inside intraforaminal space. Thus the intraspinal lesion such as disc protrusion or spondylotic encroachment may compress DRG and cause abnormal findings of SNAP in EMG study. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2009; 33: 309-315)
  • 2,088 View
  • 27 Download
Superficial Peroneal Nerve Conduction Study.
Lee, Zee Ihn , Lee, Yang Soo , Kim, Poong Taek
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1997;21(2):330-334.

Sixteen legs in eight cadavera were dissected to observe the anatomic course of the superficial peroneal nerve around the ankle and the superficial peroneal sensory conduction study was performed in twenty-eight normal subjects. The anatomic course of the superficial peroneal nerve around the ankle was in two types, type I and type II. Type I was 13 cases(81%) and type II was 3 cases(19%). In type I, the nerve penetrated the crural fascia and became subcutaneous at 8.8⁑1.1 cm proximal to the ankle joint and divided into two major branches at 2.6⁑1.1 cm proximal to the ankle. Medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerves were located at 47%(⁑3.4%) and 35%(⁑4.9%) of the intermalleolar distance from lateral malleolus, respectively. In type II, the medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve arose seperately from the superficial peroneal nerve at 8.0⁑0.9 cm proximal to the ankle joint. Medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerves were located at 49%(⁑5.6%) and 33%(⁑4.0%) of the intermalleolar distance from the lateral malleolus, respectively. Superficial peroneal sensory conduction study was performed based on the findings of type I. The mean distal latencies and amplitudes were 3.21⁑0.35 msec, 12.1⁑3.37 ㄍV and 3.17⁑0.37msec, 14.54⁑4.60 ㄍV in medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerves, respectively.

  • 1,902 View
  • 13 Download
TOP