Objective: This research aimed to define the relationship between the lower lumbar disc herniation and the morphology of the iliolumbar ligaments using magnetic resonance imaging.
Method: 24 male and 36 female patients were classified into two groups according to their disc herniation grade- those in whom the L5-S1 disc was less herniated than L4-5 disc, those in whom the L5-S1 disc was more herniated than the L4-L5 disc on magnetic resonance images. The lengths of iliolumbar ligaments were measured on T1- weighted coronal images. The angles of iliolumbar ligaments were measured on T1-weighted axial images.
Results: The length of iliolumbar ligament was not different between L4-L5 disc herniation and L5-S1 disc herniation. The degree of iliolumbar ligament angle difference (asymmetry of direction) at L5-S1 disc herniation was more deviated in paracentral disc herniation compared with central disc herniation.
Conclusion: The morphology of the iliolumbar ligament, especially its asymmetry of direction, may be a factor influencing the development of disc herniation at L5-S1. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2002; 26: 439-444)
Objective: The purposes of this study were to observe the radiographic changes of lumbar facet joints by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conservatively and operatively treated groups of patients with herniated intervertebral disc, and to compare the biomechanical effects to lumbar facet joints according to the treatment methods
Method: The patients composed of 20 conservatively treated control group and 40 operatively treated group who had disc herniation at lower lumbar spine. Follow-up MRIs were performed in order to assess the radiographic changes of intervertebral disc and lumbar facet joints, such as disc degeneration, lumbar facet joint angle and tropism in either treatment groups individually.
Results: There are significant increase in lumbar facet joint angle in operatvely treated group at the level of both L4/5, right L5/S1 compared to that of conservately treated group, but the disc degeneration and facet joint tropism were not changed after treatment in both groups. There's no relationship between treatment period and each parameters.
Conclusion: The radiographic biomechanical lumbar facet joint changes on MRI seems to be related to degenerative change of lumbar facet joint in operatively treated group with a lumbar disc herniation. Therefore, careful selection of optimal operation time and criteria would be important.
Method: MRI images were reviewed from thirty two patients who were diagnosed electrodiagnostically as unilateral S1 radiculopathy. Areas of herniated disc and spinal canal were measured and the ratio of disc herniation was calculated from the axial images stored and analyzed by PACS. The radiologic measurements were compared with the results of electrodiagnostic studies. Results: The presence of abnormal spontaneous activities in needle EMG and no response in H reflex were associated with larger disc herniation (p<0.05). There was no other single electrodiagnostic study that showed correlation with any of radiologic measurements. With increasing number of abnormal electrodiagnostic tests, area of disc herniation grew larger (p<0.05). Area of spinal canal and the ratio of disc herniation did not show difference between normal and abnormal groups in most of electrodiagnostic studies. Conclusion: There were limited correlations between electrodiagnostic results and severity of disc herniation. The size of disc herniation, regardless of the size of spinal canal, was associated with abnormal results of electrodiagnostic tests. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2008; 32: 194-199)
Objective: To clarify the relationship between the morphologic changes of disc herniation and the clinical course of conservatively treated herniated lumbar disc patients.
Method: Follow-up MRIs and clinical assessments by the Visual Analogue Scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) Score were performed in 20 patients at a mean interval of 11.3 month.
Results: An average reduction ratio of herniation on the sagittal and axial images, were 21.4% and 20.8% respectively. The clinical features improved significantly and the degree of clinical improvement correlated with the reduction ratio of herniation, althougy 4 patients improved symptomatically despite increased or unchanged degree of herniation. Ten patients with extruded discs showed a higher reduction ratio of heniation with better clinical outcome than those with protruded discs.
Conclusion: The morphologic change verified on MRI of conservatively treated patients with a lumbar disc herniation is responsible for the clinical outcome although the anatomical factor alone is not enough to explain the outcome. The patients with extruded disc herniation shows more morphologic changes on MRI and better clinical outcomes than the patients with protruded discs.