• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Cortical stimulation"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Cortical stimulation"

Case Report

Limitation of Intraoperative Transcranial Electrical Stimulation-Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Brain Tumor Resection Adjacent to the Primary Motor Cortex
Hui Jae Do, Han Gil Seo, Byung-Mo Oh, Chul-Kee Park, Jin Wook Kim, Young Doo Choi, Seung Hak Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(5):767-772.   Published online October 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.767
Transcranial electrical stimulation-motor evoked potential (TES-MEP) is a valuable intraoperative monitoring technique during brain tumor surgery. However, TES can stimulate deep subcortical areas located far from the motor cortex. There is a concern about false-negative results from the use of TES-MEP during resection of those tumors adjacent to the primary motor cortex. Our study reports three cases of TES-MEP monitoring with false-negative results due to deep axonal stimulation during brain tumor resection. Although no significant change in TES-MEP was observed during surgery, study subjects experienced muscle weakness after surgery. Deep axonal stimulation of TES could give false-negative results. Therefore, a combined method of TES-MEP and direct cortical stimulation-motor evoked potential (DCS-MEP) or direct subcortical stimulation should be considered to overcome the limitation of TES-MEP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Detecting and Addressing Secondary Neural Injuries in Cranial Surgery: Case Report
    Justin W. Silverstein, James Duehr, Sabena Vilaysom, Michael Schulder, Daniel G. Eichberg
    The Neurodiagnostic Journal.2024; 64(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Short and long-term prognostic value of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in brain tumor patients: a case series of 121 brain tumor patients
    Justin W. Silverstein, Harshal A. Shah, Prashin Unadkat, Sabena Vilaysom, John A. Boockvar, David J. Langer, Jason A. Ellis, Randy S. D’Amico
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2023; 161(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Real world demonstration of hand motor mapping using the structural connectivity atlas
    Karol Osipowicz, Christos Profyris, Alana Mackenzie, Peter Nicholas, Peter Rudder, Hugh M. Taylor, Isabella M. Young, Angus W. Joyce, Lewis Dobbin, Onur Tanglay, Lerroy Thompson, Tshimollo Mashilwane, Michael E. Sughrue, Stephane Doyen
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2023; 228: 107679.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential in Clipping Surgery for Cerebral Aneurysms-Introduction of a New Protocol for Stable Monitoring
    Tatsuya SASAKI, Kensuke MURAKAMI, Atsushi SAITO, Shinya HARYU, Masayuki KAMEYAMA, Yoshiharu TAKAHASHI, Satoru TAKAMURO, Nana KATO, Toshiki ENDO
    Neurologia medico-chirurgica.2023; 63(9): 409.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for supratentorial brain tumor surgery
    Han Gil Seo
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2020; 2(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • 6,274 View
  • 106 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Original Articles
Effects of Electric Cortical Stimulation (ECS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Rats With a Traumatic Brain Injury
Ki Pi Yu, Yong-Soon Yoon, Jin Gyeong Lee, Ji Sun Oh, Jeong-Seog Lee, Taeyong Seog, Han-Young Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(4):502-513.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.502
Objective
To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation (ECS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor and cognitive function recovery and brain plasticity in focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) of rats model.
Methods
Forty rats were pre-trained to perform a single pellet reaching task (SPRT), rotarod test (RRT), and Y-maze test for 14 days, then a focal TBI was induced by a weight drop model on the motor cortex. All rats were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: anodal ECS (50 Hz and 194 μs) (ECS group), tDCS (0.1 mA, 50 Hz and 200 μs) (tDCS group), and no stimulation as a control group. Four-week stimulation, including rehabilitation, was started 3 days after the operation. SPRT, RRT, and Y-maze were measured from day 1 to day 28 after the TBI was induced. Histopathological and immunohistochemistry staining evaluations were performed at 4 weeks.
Results
SPRT was improved from day 7 to day 26 in ECS, and from day 8 to day 26 in tDCS compared to the control group (p<0.05). SPRT of ECS group was significantly improved on days 3, 8, 9, and 17 compared to the tDCS group. Y-maze was improved from day 8 to day 16 in ECS, and on days 6, 12, and 16 in the tDCS group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Y-maze of the ECS group was significantly improved on day 9 to day 15 compared to the tDCS group. The c-Fos protein expression was better in the ECS group and the tDCS group compared to the control group.
Conclusion
Electric stimulation in rats modified with a focal TBI is effective for motor recovery and brain plasticity. ECS induced faster behavioral and cognitive improvements compared to tDCS during the recovery period of rats with a focal TBI.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neurophysiological Markers of Reward Processing Can Inform Preclinical Neurorehabilitation Approaches for Cognitive Impairments Following Brain Injury
    Miranda Francoeur Koloski, Reyana Menon, Victoria Krasnyanskiy
    Brain Sciences.2025; 15(5): 471.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Intersection of Brain–Computer Interfaces and Quantum Sensing: A Review of Research Progress and Future Trends
    Kun Liao, Zhaochu Yang, Dong Tao, Libo Zhao, Nuno Pires, Carlos Alberto Dorao, Bjørn Torger Stokke, Lars Eric Roseng, Wen Liu, Zhuangde Jiang
    Advanced Quantum Technologies.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery
    Purvi Kaurani, Ana Vitoria Moreira de Marchi Apolaro, Keerthi Kunchala, Shriya Maini, Huda A F Rges, Ashley Isaac, Mohit Lakkimsetti, Mohammed Raake, Zahra Nazir
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation Therapies in Pre-Clinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Translational Applications
    Shanan Surendrakumar, Thallita Kelly Rabelo, Ana Carolina P. Campos, Adriano Mollica, Agessandro Abrahao, Nir Lipsman, Matthew J. Burke, Clement Hamani
    Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 40(5-6): 435.     CrossRef
  • Effects of single session transcranial direct current stimulation on aerobic performance and one arm pull-down explosive force of professional rock climbers
    Jia Luo, Caihua Fang, Sen Huang, Jinlong Wu, Bowen Liu, Jingxuan Yu, Wen Xiao, Zhanbing Ren
    Frontiers in Physiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research
    D. Ziesel, M. Nowakowska, S. Scheruebel, K. Kornmueller, U. Schäfer, R. Schindl, C. Baumgartner, M. Üçal, T. Rienmüller
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on loss of motor function caused by experimental mild traumatic brain injury
    Güven AKÇAY, Recep BAYDEMİR
    Cukurova Medical Journal.2023; 48(3): 972.     CrossRef
  • Optogenetics for Understanding and Treating Brain Injury: Advances in the Field and Future Prospects
    Yuwen Sun, Manrui Li, Shuqiang Cao, Yang Xu, Peiyan Wu, Shuting Xu, Qian Pan, Yadong Guo, Yi Ye, Zheng Wang, Hao Dai, Xiaoqi Xie, Xiameng Chen, Weibo Liang
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(3): 1800.     CrossRef
  • Using dual polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation in global cerebral ischemia and its following reperfusion period attenuates neuronal injury
    Rasoul Kaviannejad, Seyed Morteza Karimian, Esmail Riahi, Ghorbangol Ashabi
    Metabolic Brain Disease.2022; 37(5): 1503.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary Study on Safety Assessment of 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Rat Brain
    Sung Suk Oh, Yoon Bum Lee, Jae Sun Jeon, Sang-Hyun An, Jong-ryul Choi
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(11): 5299.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Acute Stage of Traumatic Brain Injury Improves Functional Recovery
    Liang-Chao Wang, Wei-Yen Wei, Pei-Chuan Ho
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 1965.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Invasive Surgical Approaches
    Jakov Tiefenbach, Hugh H. Chan, Andre G. Machado, Kenneth B. Baker
    Neurosurgery.2022; 91(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • Cortical Electrical Stimulation Ameliorates Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Sensorimotor and Cognitive Deficits in Rats
    Chi-Wei Kuo, Ming-Yuan Chang, Hui-Hua Liu, Xiao-Kuo He, Shu-Yen Chan, Ying-Zu Huang, Chih-Wei Peng, Pi-Kai Chang, Chien-Yuan Pan, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rodent models used in preclinical studies of deep brain stimulation to rescue memory deficits
    Matthieu Faillot, Antoine Chaillet, Stéphane Palfi, Suhan Senova
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2021; 130: 410.     CrossRef
  • Optogenetic Modulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Samantha L. Delaney, Julian L. Gendreau, Marissa D'Souza, Austin Y. Feng, Allen L. Ho
    Stem Cells and Development.2020; 29(4): 187.     CrossRef
  • Cathodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Selectively Decreases Impulsivity after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
    Kris M. Martens, Kristen M. Pechacek, Cassandra G. Modrak, Virginia J. Milleson, Binxing Zhu, Cole Vonder Haar
    Journal of Neurotrauma.2019; 36(19): 2827.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing rehabilitation and functional recovery after brain and spinal cord trauma with electrical neuromodulation
    Anna-Sophie Hofer, Martin E. Schwab
    Current Opinion in Neurology.2019; 32(6): 828.     CrossRef
  • Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes
    Edgard Morya, Kátia Monte-Silva, Marom Bikson, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli, Andre Fonseca, Tommaso Bocci, Faranak Farzan, Raaj Chatterjee, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado, André Russowsky Brunoni, Eva Mezger, Luciane
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,508 View
  • 163 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
Yong-Soon Yoon, Ki Pi Yu, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kim, Soo Hyun Kwak, Bong Ok Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(5):596-608.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596
Objective

To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain.

Method

Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment.

Results

There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group.

Conclusion

Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intracranial Neuromodulation for Neurologic Recovery
    Angela Madira, Muhib Khan, Rushna Ali
    Contemporary Neurosurgery.2024; 46(5): 1.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Acute Stage of Traumatic Brain Injury Improves Functional Recovery
    Liang-Chao Wang, Wei-Yen Wei, Pei-Chuan Ho
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 1965.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Invasive Surgical Approaches
    Jakov Tiefenbach, Hugh H. Chan, Andre G. Machado, Kenneth B. Baker
    Neurosurgery.2022; 91(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • Restoration of arm and hand functions via noninvasive cervical cord neuromodulation after traumatic brain injury: a case study
    Qiuyang Qian, Yan To Ling, Hui Zhong, Yong-Ping Zheng, Monzurul Alam
    Brain Injury.2020; 34(13-14): 1771.     CrossRef
  • A new model of experimental hemispherotomy in young adult Rattus norvegicus: a neural tract tracing and SPECT in vivo study
    Ivair Matias, Daoud Hibrahim Elias-Filho, Camila Araújo Bernardino Garcia, Guilherme Henrique Silva, Jorge Mejia, Francisco Romero Cabral, Ana Cláudia Camargo Miranda, Sérgio Gomes da Silva, Luíza da Silva Lopes, Norberto Cysne Coimbra, Hélio Rubens Macha
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2019; 130(4): 1210.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Electric Cortical Stimulation (ECS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Rats With a Traumatic Brain Injury
    Ki Pi Yu, Yong-Soon Yoon, Jin Gyeong Lee, Ji Sun Oh, Jeong-Seog Lee, Taeyong Seog, Han-Young Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(4): 502.     CrossRef
  • High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating moderate traumatic brain injury in rats: A pilot study
    Xia Lu, Xinjie Bao, Jiantao Li, Guanghao Zhang, Jian Guan, Yunzhou Gao, Peilin Wu, Zhaohui Zhu, Xiaolin Huo, Renzhi Wang
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2017; 13(5): 2247.     CrossRef
  • Motor cortex stimulation does not lead to functional recovery after experimental cortical injury in rats
    Lisa-Maria Schönfeld, Ali Jahanshahi, Evi Lemmens, Matthias Bauwens, Sarah-Anna Hescham, Sandra Schipper, Melanie Lagiere, Sven Hendrix, Yasin Temel
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(3): 295.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Epidural Electrical Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Rats With Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury
    Yong-Soon Yoon, Kang Hee Cho, Eun-Sil Kim, Mi-Sook Lee, Kwang Jae Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(3): 416.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for traumatic brain injury
    Samuel S. Shin, C. Edward Dixon, David O. Okonkwo, R. Mark Richardson
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2014; 121(5): 1219.     CrossRef
  • 5,590 View
  • 45 Download
  • 10 Crossref
TOP