• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

7
results for

"Cervical radiculopathy"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Cervical radiculopathy"

Case Report

Does C5 or C6 Radiculopathy Affect the Signal Intensity of the Brachial Plexus on Magnetic Resonance Neurography?
Tae Gyu Seo, Du Hwan Kim, In-Soo Kim, Eun Seok Son
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(2):362-367.   Published online April 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.362

Patients with C5 or C6 radiculopathy complain of shoulder area pain or shoulder girdle weakness. Typical idiopathic neuralgic amyotrophy (INA) is also characterized by severe shoulder pain, followed by paresis of shoulder girdle muscles. Recent studies have demonstrated that magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of the brachial plexus and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder in patients with INA show high signal intensity (HSI) or thickening of the brachial plexus and changes in intramuscular denervation of the shoulder girdle. We evaluated the value of brachial plexus MRN and shoulder MRI in four patients with typical C5 or C6 radiculopathy. HSI of the brachial plexus was noted in all patients and intramuscular changes were observed in two patients who had symptoms over 4 weeks. Our results suggest that HSI or thickening of the brachial plexus and changes in intramuscular denervation of the shoulder girdle on MRN and MRI may not be specific for INA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Answer to Cabona et al « Isolated musculocutaneous nerve involvement in COVID-19 related Neuralgic amyotrophy» Joint Bone Spine 2021;88:105238 and to Finsterer and Scorza « SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination associated Parsonage-Turner syndrome». Joint
    Clemence Coll, Muriel Tessier, Christophe Vandendries, Paul Seror
    Joint Bone Spine.2021; 88(6): 105240.     CrossRef
  • Infraspinatus muscle palsy involving suprascapular nerve, brachial plexus or cervical roots related to inflammatory or mechanical causes: Experience of 114 cases
    Paul Seror, Alexandra Roren, Marie Martine Lefevre-Colau
    Neurophysiologie Clinique.2020; 50(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Medical students vs general public awareness regarding disc prolapse in Jeddah
    ZeyadA Alamri, NawafK Althobaiti, AnasT Halabi, HussamO Bashraheel, AbdulrahmanR Shalwala, MohammedA Alyousef
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2020; 9(6): 3030.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Neurography in Cervical Radiculopathy
    Daniel Schwarz, Henrich Kele, Moritz Kronlage, Tim Godel, Tim Hilgenfeld, Martin Bendszus, Philipp Bäumer
    Investigative Radiology.2018; 53(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • New technologies for the assessment of neuropathies
    Roberto Gasparotti, Luca Padua, Chiara Briani, Giuseppe Lauria
    Nature Reviews Neurology.2017; 13(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • 8,484 View
  • 79 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Original Articles
Treatment Effects of Ultrasound Guide Selective Nerve Root Block for Lower Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study of 1-Year Follow-up
Yongbum Park, Jae Ki Ahn, Yukyung Sohn, Haemi Jee, Ji Hae Lee, Jongwoo Kim, Ki Deok Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(5):658-667.   Published online October 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.658
Objective

To compare the long-term effects and advantages of ultrasound (US)-guided selective cervical nerve root block with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal block.

Methods

From March 2009 to November 2012, 162 patients received steroid injections for lower cervical radicular pain. A total of 114 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All procedures were performed by using US or FL. We compared the intravascular injections during the procedure with the effects and functional scales at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure between the two groups. Successful treatments occurred when patients obtained significant pain reliefs (as measured by >50% improvements in the verbal numerical scale [VNS] score and >40% improvements in the neck disability index [NDI] score) and reported a patient satisfaction score of 3 or 4 points at 12 months after the injection. Image analysis of intravascular injection and chart review were performed. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the correlations between successful treatments and variables (patient's age, gender, duration of the disease, cause, injection method, and radiologic finding).

Results

The VNS and NDI improved 3 months after the injection and continued to improve until 12 months for both groups. But there were no statistical differences in changes of VNS, NDI, and effectiveness between these two groups. The proportion of patients with successful treatment is illustrated as 62.5% in US-guided group and 58% in FL-guided group at 12 months. There were no significant differences between the groups or during follow-up periods. Three cases of the intravascular injections were done in FL-guided group.

Conclusion

The US-guided selective cervical nerve root blocks are facilitated by identifying critical vessels at unexpected locations relative to the foramen and to protect injury to such vessels, which is the leading cause of reported complications from FL-guided transforaminal blocks. On treatment effect, significant long-term improvements in functions and pain reliefs were observed in both groups after the intervention. However, significant differences were not observed between the groups. Therefore, the US-guided selective cervical nerve root block was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided transforaminal block in pain reliefs and functional improvements, in addition to the absence of radiation and protection vessel injury at real-time imaging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ultrasound‐guided and CT‐guided selective cervical nerve root injection for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A retrospective clinical study
    Ran Bing, Li Wenting, Chen Rong, Song Chanchan, Deng Xin, Wei Jun
    Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.2024; 52(1): 59.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study
    Halil Cihan Kose, Selin Guven Kose, Feyza Celikel, Serkan Tulgar, Omer Taylan Akkaya
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(7): 721.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic cervical radicular pain
    Ezgi Can, Ömer Taylan Akkaya
    Journal of Ultrasound.2024; 27(4): 847.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection of cervical nerve roots for cervical radicular pain in patients with mild and moderate to severe stenosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Chang-Hao Lin, Yun-Shan Yen, Cheng-Yi Wu
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Using Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB): Where are We Now?
    Dongfang Yang, Lichen Xu, Yutong Hu, Weibing Xu
    Pain and Therapy.2022; 11(2): 341.     CrossRef
  • An open-label non-inferiority randomized trail comparing the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root block and fluoroscopy-guided cervical transforaminal epidural block for cervical radiculopathy
    Xiaohong Cui, Di Zhang, Yongming Zhao, Yongsheng Song, Liangliang He, Jian Zhang
    Annals of Medicine.2022; 54(1): 2669.     CrossRef
  • New Simple Ultrasound‐Guided Transforaminal Injection in Patients With Radiculopathy in the Lower Cervical Spine
    Yuexiang Wang, Yaqiong Zhu, Wei Wang, Yizheng Shi, Jing Yang
    Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2021; 40(7): 1401.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root injections: a narrative review of literature
    Reza Ehsanian, Byron J Schneider, David J Kennedy, Eugene Koshkin
    Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.2021; 46(5): 416.     CrossRef
  • US-Guided Transforaminal Cervical Nerve Root Block: A Novel Lateral in-Plane Approach
    Junzhen Wu, Yongming Xu, Shaofeng Pu, Jin Zhou, Yingying Lv, Cheng Li, Dongping Du
    Pain Medicine.2021; 22(9): 1940.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Diagnostic Injections in Spinal Disorders: A Narrative Review
    Brian Y. Kim, Tyler A. Concannon, Luis C. Barboza, Talal W. Khan
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(12): 2311.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Radicular Pain; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Aaron Conger, Daniel M Cushman, Rebecca A Speckman, Taylor Burnham, Masaru Teramoto, Zachary L McCormick
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • The safety and efficiency of performing cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections under fluoroscopic control on an ambulatory/outpatient basis
    Keith Bush, Ramin Mandegaran, Elizabeth Robinson, Ali Zavareh
    European Spine Journal.2020; 29(5): 994.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Jin Hyuk Jang, Woo Yong Lee, Jong woo Kim, Kyoung Rai Cho, Sang Hyun Nam, YongBum Park
    Pain Research and Management.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Evidenzbasierte Interventionen an der Halswirbelsäule
    Stephan Klessinger, Martin Legat
    Orthopädie & Rheuma.2020; 23(4): 40.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic and diagnostic value of transforaminal epidural injections in patients with herniated disc and radicular pain: analytical literature review
    A. L. Krivoshapkin, I. D. Savitskiy, G. S. Sergeev, A. S. Gaytan, O. A. Abdullaev
    Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery).2020; 17(3): 53.     CrossRef
  • Evidenzbasierte Interventionen an der Halswirbelsäule
    Stephan Klessinger, Martin Legat
    Schmerzmedizin.2020; 36(6): 22.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Ki Deok Park, Woo Yong Lee, Sang Hyun Nam, Myounghwan Kim, Yongbum Park
    Journal of Ultrasound.2019; 22(2): 167.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Results and Complications of Shoulder Manipulation under Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block for Frozen Shoulder: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Ryosuke Takahashi, Yusuke Iwahori, Yukihiro Kajita, Yohei Harada, Yoshitaka Muramatsu, Tatsunori Ikemoto, Masataka Deie
    Pain and Therapy.2019; 8(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • When is the Optimal Time Point for Predicting the 1-Year Follow-up Outcome of Selective Nerve Root Block for Cervical Radiculopathy?
    Whee Sung Son, Myun-Whan Ahn, Gun Woo Lee
    Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2019; 26(2): 40.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Ultrasound Utilization in Selective Cervical Nerve Root Injection for the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain: a Review
    Reza Ehsanian, David J. Kennedy, Byron Schneider
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2019; 7(4): 386.     CrossRef
  • When is the Optimal Time Point for Predicting the 1-Year Follow-up Outcome of Selective Nerve Root Block for Cervical Radiculopathy?
    Whee Sung Son, Myun-Whan Ahn, Gun Woo Lee
    Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2019; 26(2): 40.     CrossRef
  • Update in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Research
    O. Kenechi Nwawka
    Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach.2016; 8(5): 429.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block: Does Volume Affect the Spreading Pattern?
    Seok Kang, Seung Nam Yang, Se Hwa Kim, Chan Woo Byun, Joon Shik Yoon
    Pain Medicine.2016; 17(11): 1978.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging and short-term clinical results of severe frozen shoulder treated with manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block
    Hideyuki Sasanuma, Hideharu Sugimoto, Yuji Kanaya, Yuki Iijima, Tomohiro Saito, Toshihiro Saito, Katsushi Takeshita
    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.2016; 25(1): e13.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Procedures for Chronic Pain Management
    Samuel Korbe, Esther N Udoji, Timothy J Ness, Mercy A Udoji
    Pain Management.2015; 5(6): 466.     CrossRef
  • 6,707 View
  • 103 Download
  • 25 Crossref
Reference Data of Cervical Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Using Low Intensity Stimulation and Report of 2 Cases.
Seo, Min Ho , Park, Sung Hee , Ko, Myoung Hwan , Eun, Jong Pil , Seo, Jeong Hwan
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2011;35(2):236-242.
Objective
To establish reference data for dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEP) using a stimulation intensity lower than what is conventionally utilized. Method Fifty subjects (25 older adults>48 years old; 25 younger adults<32 years old) without history of neck pain or cervical spine surgery were enrolled. The DSEP study was performed with stimulation intensities of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.5 times sensory threshold (ST) on right arms for C5, C6, C7, and C8 dermatomes. Results The mean latencies of DSEP stimulating C5, C6, C7, and C8 dermatomes with 1.5 times ST intensity were 17.6±1.7 ms, 22.2±2.1 ms, 22.8±1.4 ms, and 22.6±1.8 ms, respectively. The mean amplitude (N1P1) of DSEP stimulating C5, C6, C7, and C8 dermatomes with 1.5 times ST intensity were 0.9±0.4 ՌV, 0.9±0.5 ՌV, 1.0±0.6 ՌV, and 1.1±0.8 ՌV, respectively. The C5, C6, C7, and C8 DSEP were evoked in 84%, 98%, 100%, and 96% of cases with 2.5 times ST compared to 64%, 56%, 60%, and 62% with 1.5 times ST, respectively. When one DSEP was not evoked, the DSEP of the opposite side was evoked only in 2 subjects. Conclusion This study provides the reference data of DSEP with lower stimulation intensities than are conventionally utilized. Additionally, two cases of clinical significance were reported.
  • 1,562 View
  • 7 Download
Cervical Multifidus Muscle Atrophy in Patients with Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy.
Chae, Sang Han , Lee, Seong Jae , Kim, Min Seok , Kim, Tae Uk , Hyun, Jung Keun
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2010;34(6):743-751.
Objective To assess the atrophy of cervical multifidus muscles in patients with unilateral cervical disc herniation or radiculopathy quantitatively and to investigate whether asymmetric muscle atrophy has the relationship with the severity of cervical disc herniation or radiculopathy.

Method Twenty-four patients who had cervical disc herniation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups; patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy in electrodiagnosis (RAD) and patients without definite radiculopathy (HIVD). Twenty six controls without disc herniation were also evaluated. Cervical multifidus muscles from C4-5 to C7-T1 levels were detected in T1 axial MRI, and total cross-sectional area (CSA) of multifidus muscle (TMA) and pure muscle CSA (PMA) were measured.

Results The ratios of TMA in involved side to TMA in uninvolved side (ITMA/UTMA) and PMA in involved side to PMA in uninvolved side (IPMA/UPMA) in HIVD and RAD groups was significantly lower than those in control group especially at C7-T1 level (p<0.05). We divided the levels of cervical spine into three parts according to lesions found in MRI or electrodiagnosis; above lesion level, at lesion level and below lesion level. Abnormal cases of IPMA/UPMA were not different among levels in HIVD group, but RAD group showed that most of abnormal cases were below lesion (60%).

Conclusion Asymmetric multifidus atrophy was seen in patients with cervical disc herniation and radiculopathy. The ratio of pure muscle CSA between involved and uninvolved sides might be a useful parameter to differentiate patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy from patients without radiculopathy.

  • 1,923 View
  • 31 Download
The Ultrasound-guided Selective Nerve Root Injections in the Lower Cervical Spines.
Yun, Dong Hwan , Yu, Seung Don , Kim, Dong Hwan , Choi, Seong Hun , Song, Jae Min
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2008;32(6):619-623.
Objective: To introduce the technique of the ultrasound- guided selective nerve root injection in the lower cervical spine and to evaluate its accuracy and distribution patterns of injections. Method: Thirty-one patients with the cervical radiculopathies (C5 to C7) from cervical disc herniation were enrolled in this study. Targeted nerve root image was obtained and the needle was introduced to its dorsal surface under the ultrasound guidance. Then 2 ml of contrast media was injected which was followed by fluoroscopic image. The accurate injection was defined as the contrast media placed over the neural foramen along the targeted nerve root. Results: 24 of 31 (77.4%) procedures were assesed to be accurately placed and there was no significant complication. The accuracy of injection was lower at the C7 nerve root (70.0%) than other nerve roots. In all cases, large amount of back flow to the brachial plexus and spread to the adjacent nerve roots were observed. Conclusion: In the lower cervical spines, ultrasound-guided selective nerve root injections might be considered as a radiation free, safe and available method. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2008; 32: 619-623)
  • 1,597 View
  • 20 Download
Cervical Radiculopathy: Selective Nerve Root Injection of Steroids.
Sung, Duk Hyun , Lee, Kang Woo , Ra, Yun Ju
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2000;24(4):725-732.

Objective: To determine the therapeutic efficacy of fluoroscopic and electrical stimulation guided perineural selective nerve root injection in cervical radiculopathy patients.

Method: The gold standard of the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy was based on clinical features, MRI and electrodiagnostic findings. Considering the natural regression of pain in cervical radiculopathy, only patients (n=27, 14 male and 13 female) who had suffered from persisting or aggravating pain for at least 6 weeks or longer duration after the onset of symptoms, were received a selective nerve root injection (SNRI) of steroids to a target nerve root.

Patients were followed up at 2 weeks and 2 months, and interviewed via telephone or re-examined at an average of 37.8 weeks 68 weeks after injection by a independent physician. Criteria for a successful outcome were greater than 50% reduction of pain on visual analogue scale and an ability to return to previous level of function.

Results: High proportion of patients reported a successful outcome at 2 weeks (88.9%, 24 of 27 patients). Twenty-two of twenty-four patients reported the outcome at 2 months and 20 of 22 patients were followed up for an averrge period of 37.3 weeks. Among these 20 patients 19 patients satisfied with the result of SNRI at an average follow up period of 68 weeks. There was no significant difference of the efficacy according to the duration of the symptoms. There were no complications in any of the patients after injections.

Conclusion: Fluoroscopic and electrical stimulation guided selective nerve root injections of corticosteroids were an effective and safe treatment modality in cervical radiculopathy. These could be considered as a first line treatment before a surgical intervention in whom another conservative treatments are not effective.

  • 1,376 View
  • 8 Download
Measurement of Intervertebral Foramina on the Plain Radiographs of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy.
Choi, Eun Seok , Yang, Seung Han , Kang, Sae Yoon , Lee, Yeon Soo , Park, Soo Yeol
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1997;21(2):317-322.

In this study, we measured the intervertebral foramina on the plain radiographs of cervical spine of fifty three patients who were over forty-year-old, and with single or multiple unilateral cervical radiculopathies on EMG. In order to determine if the foraminal stenosis on plain radiographs can determine the presense of radiculopathy, four parameters such as vertical diameter, mid-transverse diameter, inferior transverse diameter, and area were measured by a digital caliberator(CD-15C, Mitutoyo, Japan) and an image analyzer(VIDAS 2.0, Kontron, Germany) in 194 foramina of both sides(affected and unaffected groups). Another 80 foramina were also measured as control group in ten age-matched patients who did not show any abnormality on EMG.

In control group, C4/5 intervertebral foramen showed maximal values of the parameters among foramina, with vertical diameter of 10.55⁑0.35 mm(mean⁑S.D.), mid-transverse diameter of 6.22⁑0.33 mm, inferior transverse diameter of 5.09⁑0.19 mm and area of 0.77⁑0.05 cm2. The minimal values were noted in C6/7 foramen except those of the vertical diameter which were noted in C4/5 foramen. The mid-transverse diameter and area of C7/T1 intervertebral foramen of affected group were significantly smaller than those of control and unaffected groups(p<0.05). The other values in affected group were also smaller among the groups but they did not reach statistical significance.

In conclusion, the mid-transverse diameter and area of intervertebral foramen on plain cervical radiographs are somewhat useful to determine the encroachment of nerve root within the intervertebral foramen, especially in the lower cervical spine, in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

  • 1,747 View
  • 7 Download
TOP