Objective
To investigate the clinical effectiveness of and parents’ perspectives on cranial-molding orthotic treatment.
Methods
Medical charts were reviewed for 82 infants treated for plagiocephaly with cranial-molding orthoses in our clinic from April 2012 to July 2016 retrospectively. Infants who were clinically diagnosed with positional plagiocephaly and had a Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) of more than 3.5% were included. Pre- and post-treatment CVAI was obtained by three-dimensional head-surface laser scan. Parents’ perceptions of good outcome (satisfaction) were evaluated with the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The GAS score assessed how much the parent felt that his or her initial goal for correcting the skull asymmetry was achieved after the treatment.
Results
The compliance with cranial-molding orthoses was 90.2% (74 of 82 infants). There were 53 infants (65% of the 82 infants) who had adverse events with the cranial-molding orthoses during the study. Heat rash was found in 29 cases (35.4%) and was the most common adverse event. The mean GAS T-score was 51.9±10.2. A GAS T-score of 0 or more was identified for 71.6% of parents. The GAS T-score was significantly related to the age (p<0.001), the initial CVAI, and the difference of CVAI during the treatment (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Parents’ perception of good outcome was correlated with the anthropometric improvement in cranialmolding orthotic treatment in infants with plagiocephaly. A high percentage of parents felt that the treatment met their initial goals in spite of a high occurrence of adverse events.

Citations

• Cranial Remolding Orthosis Therapy for Positional Deformational Head Shape Abnormalities: The Parental Perspective
  Sai Cherukuri, Jainaha Srikumar, Alexandre Meira Pazelli, Samir Mardini, Uldis Bite, Kathy Brumfield, Edward S. Ahn, Ashley Grossbach, Waleed Gibreel
  The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal.2026; 63(6): 1609.     CrossRef
• Impact of Age on Success of 3D-Printed Cranial Remolding Orthoses for Deformational Head Shapes
  Emilia Cotter, Maria Araujo, Alyssa Juma, Jijia Wang, Tiffany Graham
  Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(18): 7002.     CrossRef
• The Caregiver Burden of Helmet Therapy following Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study
  Tega Ebeye, Ayeh Hussain, Erin Brennan, Abhaya V. Kulkarni, Christopher R. Forrest, Johanna N. Riesel
  Pediatric Neurosurgery.2024; 59(4): 121.     CrossRef
• Helmet Therapy for Positional Plagiocephaly: A Systematic Review of the Tools Used to Diagnose, Offer Treatment Recommendations, and Assess Treatment Outcomes of the Condition
  L. Kate Lamberta, Thomas R. Murray, Alison Gehred, Pedro Weisleder
  Pediatric Neurology.2024; 161: 125.     CrossRef
• Denominator of Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index: Choosing Between Longer and Shorter Diagonal Lengths
  Hiroshi Miyabayashi, Katsuya Saito, Risa Kato, Takanori Noto, Nobuhiko Nagano, Ichiro Morioka
  Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2023; 34(4): e369.     CrossRef
• Effect of rolling over pattern and caregiver perception on plagiocephaly in Korean infants
  Jin A Yoon, Soo-Yeon Kim, Yong Beom Shin
  Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics.2023; 66(6): 272.     CrossRef
• Side Effects of Cranial Remolding Orthoses: A Multi-Site Review
  Tiffany Graham, Jijia Wang
  Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2022; 33(5): 1358.     CrossRef
• Subjective perception of craniofacial growth asymmetries in patients with deformational plagiocephaly
  Felix Kunz, Matthias Hirth, Tilmann Schweitzer, Christian Linz, Bernhard Goetz, Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer, Kathrin Borchert, Hartmut Böhm
  Clinical Oral Investigations.2021; 25(2): 525.     CrossRef