• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

1
results for

"Jun Tak Choi"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Jun Tak Choi"

Original Article
Validation of Korean Version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Jun Tak Choi, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Sung-Hee Park, Gi-Wook Kim, Yu Hui Won
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(2):329-335.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.2.329
Objective

To translate the English version of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL) into a Korean version and to determine the reliability and validity of the Korean version in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

The English version of LCADL was translated into Korean and back-translated into English. Subsequently, the back-translated version was reviewed and compared with the original, and thus the final K-LCADL was obtained. To evaluate the validation of the K-LCADL, patients simultaneously completed a pulmonary function test, a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and questionnaires, including the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the Korean version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (K-SGRQ), the Korean version of the COPD Assessment Test (K-CAT), and the Korean version of the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (K-EQ-5D). To assess test-retest reliability, the K-LCADL was again administered to the same patients within 2 weeks from initial assessment.

Results

A total of 94 patients participated in the present study. The total K-LCADL score was positively correlated with the K-SGRQ (r=0.802, p<0.001), the mMRC dyspnea scale (r=0.603, p<0.001), and the K-CAT score (r=0.714, p<0.001), and negatively correlated with the K-EQ-5D (r=−0.764, p<0.001), 6MWT (r=−0.635, p<0.001), forced expiratory volume in one second 1 (r=−0.416, p=0.002), and forced vital capacity (r=−0.397, p=0.023). Intraclass correlation coefficient of the K-LCADL was 0.951 (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The K-LCADL is a reliable and valid questionnaire for evaluating limitation of activities of daily living in patients with COPD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Psychometric Properties of the European Portuguese Version of the London Chest Activities of Daily Living
    Isabel De Jesus Oliveira, Inês Gomes, Nuno S Macedo, Rita S Santos, Luís J Gaspar, Pedro Lopes Ferreira
    Athena Health & Research Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reliability and validity of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale for adults with asthma
    Vitória Cavalheiro Puzzi, Joice Mara de Oliveira, Thainá Bessa Alves, Jessica Priscila da Conceição Silva, Ariele Pedroso, Karina Couto Furlanetto
    Journal of Asthma.2024; 61(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • EQ-5D Based Utility Values for Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
    Natasha Salant, Syed Mohiuddin, Yuanyuan Zhang, Lynda Ayiku, Kusal Lokuge, Paul Jacklin, Lesley Owen
    COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multi-Dimensional Dyspnea-Related Scales Validated in Individuals With Cardio-Respiratory and Cancer Diseases. A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties
    Stefania Tinti, Monica Parati, Beatrice De Maria, Nicla Urbano, Vivian Sardo, Graziella Falcone, Stefano Terzoni, Annalisa Alberti, Anne Destrebecq
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2022; 63(1): e46.     CrossRef
  • The Korean‐Lung Information Needs Questionnaire: Translation, validation and clinical implications in comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation
    Sang Hun Kim, Ho Eun Park, Jin A Yoon, Yong Beom Shin, Myung‐Jun Shin, In Joo Kong, Ki Uk Kim
    The Clinical Respiratory Journal.2022; 16(5): 343.     CrossRef
  • Factors Influencing Activities of Daily Living in Subjects With COPD
    Ismail Ozsoy, Buse Ozcan Kahraman, Serap Acar, Sevgi Ozalevli, Atila Akkoclu, Sema Savci
    Respiratory Care.2019; 64(2): 189.     CrossRef
  • 7,434 View
  • 96 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
TOP