• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Jinyoung Park"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Jinyoung Park"

Original Articles

Electrodiagnosis

Hemodynamic Consideration in Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neuromuscular Scoliosis Surgery
Seok Young Chung, Chae Hwan Lim, Yoon Ghil Park, Hak Sun Kim, Dawoon Kim, Jinyoung Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2022;46(6):292-302.   Published online December 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.22100
Objective
To prove the hypothesis that the parameters of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during will be more deteriorated in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) than in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods
This retrospective study reviewed the data of 69 patients (NMS=32, AIS=37) who underwent scoliosis surgery under IONM. The amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and the amplitude and the latency of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were examined. Demographic, preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed to determine whether they affected the IONM parameters for each group.
Results
Of the items analyzed, the bleeding amount was the only significant risk factor for SEP latency deterioration in the NMS group only. The amplitude of SEP and MEP did not correlate with the hemodynamic parameters. The NMS/AIS ratios of the bleeding-related parameters were higher in the order of bleeding amount/weight (2.62, p<0.01), bleeding amount/body mass index (2.13, p<0.01), and bleeding amount (1.56, p<0.01). This study suggests that SEP latency is more vulnerable than SEP or MEP amplitude in ischemic conditions during scoliosis surgery.
Conclusion
In NMS patients, it should be considered that the bleeding amount can have a critical effect on intraoperative electrophysiological deterioration.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cerebral Perfusion Unveiled: A Comprehensive Review of Blood Pressure Management in Neurosurgical and Endovascular Aneurysm Interventions
    Shubham Petkar, Vivek Chakole, Roshan Nisal, Vishnu Priya
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improvement in functional motor scores in patients with non-ambulatory spinal muscle atrophy during Nusinersen treatment in South Korea: a single center study
    Jin A. Yoon, Yuju Jeong, Jiae Lee, Dong Jun Lee, Kyung Nam Lee, Yong Beom Shin
    BMC Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,036 View
  • 94 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types
Taeha Park, Jinyoung Park, Yoon Ghil Park, Joowon Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2017;41(4):610-620.   Published online August 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.610
Objective

To identify which combination of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) is most reliable for postoperative motor deterioration during spinal cord tumor surgery, according to anatomical and pathologic type.

Methods

MEPs and SEPs were monitored in patients who underwent spinal cord tumor surgery between November 2012 and August 2016. Muscle strength was examined in all patients before surgery, within 48 hours postoperatively and 4 weeks later. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each significant change in SEPs and MEPs.

Results

The overall sensitivity and specificity of SEPs or MEPs were 100% and 61.3%, respectively. The intraoperative MEP monitoring alone showed both higher sensitivity (67.9%) and specificity (83.2%) than SEP monitoring alone for postoperative motor deterioration. Two patients with persistent motor deterioration had significant changes only in SEPs. There are no significant differences in reliabilities between anatomical types, except with hemangioma, where SEPs were more specific than MEPs for postoperative motor deterioration. Both overall positive and negative predictive values of MEPs were higher than the predictive values of SEPs. However, the positive predictive value was higher by the dual monitoring of MEPs and SEPs, compared to MEPs alone.

Conclusion

For spinal cord tumor surgery, combined MEP and SEP monitoring showed the highest sensitivity for the postoperative motor deterioration. Although MEPs are more specific than SEPs in most types of spinal cord tumor surgery, SEPs should still be monitored, especially in hemangioma surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Local tumor control and neurological outcomes after surgery for spinal hemangioblastomas in sporadic and von Hippel–Lindau disease: A multicenter study
    Johannes Wach, Alim Emre Basaran, Martin Vychopen, Tarik Tihan, Maria Wostrack, Vicki M Butenschoen, Bernhard Meyer, Sebastian Siller, Nils Ole Schmidt, Julia Onken, Peter Vajkoczy, Alejandro N Santos, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Philipp Dammann, Ulrich Sure, Ja
    Neuro-Oncology.2025; 27(6): 1567.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor: precision medicine in spinal tumor surgical care
    Favour Tope Adebusoye, Simran Karkhanis, Alwin Jose, Krishna Sai Kiran Sakalabaktula, Usama Saeed, Rohan S. Mane, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Paul R. Krafft, Julie L. Chan
    Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Resection of an Intradural Intramedullary C7-T1 Tumor: Technical Nuances and Complication Management
    Giovanni Barbagli, Amna Hussein, Esteban Quiceno, Michael Prim, Diego Soto Rubio, Ali Baaj
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 184: 41.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative changes in electrophysiological monitoring can be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cavernous malformation
    Xiaoyu Li, Hongqi Zhang, Jian Ren
    Open Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intradural extramedullary tumor location in the axial view affects the alert timing of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring
    Shinji Morito, Kei Yamada, Ichirou Nakae, Kimiaki Sato, Kimiaki Yokosuka, Tatsuhiro Yoshida, Takahiro Shimazaki, Yutaro Hazemoto, Rikiya Saruwatari, Kota Nishida, Shingo Okazaki, Koji Hiraoka
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.2023; 37(3): 775.     CrossRef
  • The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery
    Kai Liu, Chengyuan Ma, Dapeng Li, Haisong Li, Xuechao Dong, Bo Liu, Ying Yu, Yuxiang Fan, Hongmei Song
    Chinese Neurosurgical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative evoked potentials in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
    Myungeun Yoo, Yoon Ghil Park, Yong Eun Cho, Chae Hwan Lim, Seok Young Chung, Dawoon Kim, Jinyoung Park
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.2022; 36(1): 247.     CrossRef
  • The feasibility of intra-operative neurophysiologic monitoring using rectus abdominis muscles during thoracic tumor surgery: a case report
    Hee Tae Shin, Jin Soo Park, Seung Hak Lee
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2022; 4(2): 60.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between preoperative somatosensory evoked potentials and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal cord tumors
    Jinyoung Park, Yong Eun Cho, Mina Park, Joowon Lee, Dawoon Kim, Yoon Ghil Park
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.2021; 35(5): 979.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and Radiologic Prognostic Factors in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lesions
    Pietro Mortini, Carlotta Morselli, Alfio Spina, Michele Bailo, Ubaldo del Carro, Nicola Boari
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 150: e550.     CrossRef
  • Age at Diagnosis and Baseline Myelomalacia Sign Predict Functional Outcome After Spinal Meningioma Surgery
    Johannes Wach, Mohammed Banat, Patrick Schuss, Erdem Güresir, Hartmut Vatter, Jasmin Scorzin
    Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal cord tumor surgery
    Jinyoung Park, Yoon Ghil Park
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2021; 3(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Sudden onset temporary loss of SSEP and MEP as a result to positional neck changes in an intradural extramedullary cervical spine schwannoma: A case report
    Mohammed Zahid Alkhatib, Turki Elarjani, Abdulrahman Majed Alkhalefah, Faisal Farrash
    Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2020; 21: 100717.     CrossRef
  • Differences in the Electrophysiological Monitoring Results of Spinal Cord Arteriovenous and Intramedullary Spinal Cord Cavernous Malformations
    Xiaoyu Li, Hong-Qi Zhang, Feng Ling, Chuan He, Jian Ren
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 122: e315.     CrossRef
  • A spinal cord tumor removal case with somatosensory evoked potential change more severe than motor evoked potential change
    Jong Hyeon Ahn, Jeong Jin Park, Dan A Oh, Byung-Nam Yoon
    Journal of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.2019; 1(2): 44.     CrossRef
  • Giant Sacral Schwannoma Treated with a 360 Approach: A Rare Case and Systematic Review of the Literature
    Ursalan Ahmed Khan, Ghiath Ismayl, Irfan Malik
    World Neurosurgery.2018; 115: 65.     CrossRef
  • 8,567 View
  • 117 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Case Report
Acute Paraplegia After Lumbar Steroid Injection in Patients With Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Case Reports
Sunwoong Kim, Yuseong Choi, Jinyoung Park, Duk Hyun Sung
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(5):949-954.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.949

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) are the most common type of spinal vascular malformations. However, SDAVFs are still underdiagnosed entities because their clinical symptoms are usually non-specific, as they include low back pain or radiating pain to the limb. There have been several reports of acute paraplegia after lumbar epidural steroid injections in patients with SDAVFs. We present 4 patients with SDAVFs who received lumbar steroid injection. Among the 4 cases, acute paraplegia developed in 2 cases that received a larger volume of injectate than the other cases. Thus, we are suggesting that the volume of injectate may be a contributing factor for acute paraplegia after lumbar steroid injection in patients with SDAVFs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute onset of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula and rapid progression to complete paraplegia: a case report and review of the literature
    Xinling Su, Liping Huang, Gang Wang, Ming Zhou, Suhang Xie, Yangxiaoxue Liu
    Journal of Medical Case Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intra-arterial injection of particulate corticosteroids: mechanism of injury
    Jean-Denis Laredo, Marc Wybier, Elisabeth Laemmel, Massoud Mirshahi
    Skeletal Radiology.2023; 52(10): 1887.     CrossRef
  • Paraparesis After Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection due to Spinal Arteriovenous Fistula Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence
    Dong Ah Shin, Wonho Lee, Min Cheol Chang
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(12): 3724.     CrossRef
  • Steroid-Associated Acute Clinical Worsening and Poor Outcome in Patients With Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas
    Yongjie Ma, Tao Hong, Sichang Chen, Chao Peng, Chunxiu Wang, Kun Yang, Jiaxing Yu, Jian Ren, Lisong Bian, Jiang Liu, Zhichao Wang, Timo Krings, Feng Ling, Hongqi Zhang
    Spine.2020; 45(11): E656.     CrossRef
  • Paralysis After Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in the Absence of Hematoma
    Ziva Petrin, Ralph J. Marino, Christina V. Oleson, Jeremy I. Simon, Zachary L. McCormick
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(9): e107.     CrossRef
  • Société d’imagerie musculosquelettique (SIMS), Fédération de radiologie interventionnelle (FRI), and Société française de radiologie (SFR) recommendations for epidural and transforaminal corticosteroid injections
    A. Cotten, J.-L. Drapé, N. Sans, A. Feydy, J.-M. Bartoli, J.-F. Meder
    Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging.2018; 99(4): 219.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Presenting with Unusually Rapid Progression of Symptoms
    Rie Aoki, Kittipong Srivatanakul, Takahiro Osada, Takatoshi Sorimachi, Mitsunori Matsumae
    Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy.2018; 12(4): 181.     CrossRef
  • 7,307 View
  • 69 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
TOP