• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Eun Jung Sung"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Eun Jung Sung"

Original Articles
Prediction of Functional Outcome in Axonal Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Eun Jung Sung, Dae Yul Kim, Min Cheol Chang, Eun Jae Ko
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(3):481-488.   Published online June 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.481
Objective

To identify the factors that could predict the functional outcome in patients with the axonal type of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS).

Methods

Two hundred and two GBS patients admitted to our university hospital between 2003 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We defined a good outcome as being "able to walk independently at 1 month after onset" and a poor outcome as being "unable to walk independently at 1 month after onset". We evaluated the factors that differed between the good and poor outcome groups.

Results

Twenty-four patients were classified into the acute motor axonal neuropathy type. There was a statistically significant difference between the good and poor outcome groups in terms of the GBS disability score at admission, and GBS disability score and Medical Research Council sum score at 1 month after admission. In an electrophysiologic analysis, the good outcome group showed greater amplitude of median, ulnar, deep peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) and greater amplitude of median, ulnar, and superficial peroneal sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) than the poor outcome group.

Conclusion

A lower GBS disability score at admission, high amplitude of median, ulnar, deep peroneal, and posterior tibial CMAPs, and high amplitude of median, ulnar, and superficial peroneal SNAPs were associated with being able to walk at 1 month in patients with axonal GBS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Guillain–Barré Syndrome
    Brad Wright, Samantha R. Eiffert, Abagail Cirincione, Joshua Nardin, James F. Howard, Rebecca E. Traub
    Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between tuberculosis and Guillain–Barré syndrome: a systematic review
    Chowdhury Adnan Sami, Refaya Tasnim, Husna Rafsana, Joydip Chowdhury, Samiha Jabin Susmita, Anika Tabassum, Mohammad Ferdous Ur Rahaman, Shohael Mahmud Arafat
    Brain Disorders.2026; 21: 100299.     CrossRef
  • Potential advantage of therapeutic plasma exchange over intravenous immunoglobulin in children with axonal variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome: A report of six paediatric cases
    Joyisa Deb, Gita Negi, Aswin K. Mohan, Indar Kumar Sharawat, Pradip Banerjee, Deepali Chauhan, Daljit Kaur, Ashish Jain
    Transfusion Clinique et Biologique.2025; 32(1): 112.     CrossRef
  • Acute motor axonal neuropathy: features of diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation
    V. B. Voitenkov, I. G. Samojlova, E. Yu. Skripchenko, I. V. Cherkashina, A. V. Klimkin, M. A. Irikova, P. S. Verbenko
    Russian neurological journal.2025; 29(6): 20.     CrossRef
  • Neuroprognostication: Guillain–Barré Syndrome
    Rebecca Traub, Vinay Chaudhry
    Seminars in Neurology.2023; 43(05): 791.     CrossRef
  • Relation between Guillain-Barré syndrome and Covid-19: Case-Series
    Merey Bakytzhanovna Jumagaliyeva, Dinmukhamed Nurniyazovich Ayaganov, Ibrahim Anwar Abdelazim, Samat Sagatovich Saparbayev, Nodira Miratalievna Tuychibaeva, Yergen Jumashevich Kurmambayev
    Journal of Medicine and Life.2023; 16(9): 1433.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Electrophysiological Factors Predicting Prolonged Recovery in Children with Guillain–Barré Syndrome
    Ekta Agarwal, Ankita Bhagat, Kavita Srivastava, Bina Thakore, Sujit Jagtap, Umesh Kalane, Surekha Rajadhyaksha
    Indian Journal of Pediatrics.2022; 89(5): 452.     CrossRef
  • Erasmus Guillain-Barre Syndrome Outcome Score (EGOS) to predict functional outcomes
    Maria Ulfa, Titis Widowati, Agung Triono
    Paediatrica Indonesiana.2022; 62(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Acute Motor Sensory Axonal Neuropathy: A Variant of Guillain–Barré Syndrome—A Rare Case Report
    Gurinder Mohan, Richa G Thaman, Sanjeev K Saggar
    AMEI's Current Trends in Diagnosis & Treatment.2021; 4(2): 110.     CrossRef
  • COVID-19-Associated Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Atypical Para-infectious Profile, Symptom Overlap, and Increased Risk of Severe Neurological Complications
    Mayanja M. Kajumba, Brad J. Kolls, Deborah C. Koltai, Mark Kaddumukasa, Martin Kaddumukasa, Daniel T. Laskowitz
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2020; 2(12): 2702.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of an acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy with propionate in a 33-year-old male
    Min-Suk Yoon, Kalliopi Pitarokoili, Dietrich Sturm, Aiden Haghikia, Ralf Gold, Anna Lena Fisse
    Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12,814 View
  • 161 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neglect Syndrome in Stroke Patients
You Gyoung Yi, Min Ho Chun, Kyung Hee Do, Eun Jung Sung, Yong Gyu Kwon, Dae Yul Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(2):223-229.   Published online April 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.223
Objective

To examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) improves visuospatial attention in stroke patients with left visuospatial neglect.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: anodal tDCS over the right PPC, cathodal tDCS over the left PPC, or sham tDCS. Each patient underwent 15 sessions of tDCS (5 sessions per week for 3 weeks; 2 mA for 30 minutes in each session). Outcome measures were assessed before treatment and 1 week after completing the treatment.

Results

From pre- to post-treatment, there was an improvement in the motor-free visual perception test (MVPT), line bisection test (LBT), star cancellation test (SCT), Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), and Functional Ambulation Classification in all 3 groups. Improvements in the MVPT, SCT, and LBT were greater in the anodal and cathodal groups than in the sham group. However, improvements in other outcomes were not significantly different between the 3 groups, although there was a tendency for improved CBS or K-MBI scores in the anodal and cathodal groups, as compared with the sham group.

Conclusion

The study results indicated that the facilitatory effect of anodal tDCS applied over the right PPC, and the inhibitory effect of cathodal tDCS applied over the left PPC, improved symptoms of visuospatial neglect. Thus, tDCS could be a successful adjuvant therapeutic modality to recover neglect symptom, but this recovery might not lead to improvements in activities of daily living function and gait function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation to improve visual perception after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luis Leal-Vega, Adrián Martín-Gutiérrez, Antonio Dueñas-Laita, Marta Ruiz-Mambrilla, León Morales-Quezada, David García-Azorín, María Begoña Coco-Martín, Juan Francisco Arenillas-Lara
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2026; 33(4): 379.     CrossRef
  • Effect of noninvasive brain stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ruoxuan Zhao, Tong Hao, Chengshuo Wang, Liang Wu
    Journal of Neurology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Constraint Induced Neglect Therapy (CINT): A Proposed Technique for Spatial Neglect Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke
    Auwal Abdullahi, Thomson W. L. Wong, Shamay S. M. Ng
    Sensory Neuroscience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on visual impairment in stroke
    Fiona J Rowe, Lauren R Hepworth, María Begoña Coco-Martin, Celine R Gillebert, Luis Leal-Vega, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe, Eleni Papageorgiou, Stephen James Ryan, Karolina Skorkovska, Anne Hege Aamodt
    European Stroke Journal.2025; 10(4): 1087.     CrossRef
  • Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with motor-cognitive intervention on post-stroke cognitive impairment
    Liya Zhang, Liang Zhou, Qing Ye, Li Zhang, Yurou Kong, Siying Xia
    Neurological Sciences.2024; 45(4): 1581.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Mengyu Yan, Jiarui Liu, Yiming Guo, Qingtao Hou, Jiaqi Song, Xiaoqin Wang, Weihua Yu, Yang Lü
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment
    Kelly L. Sloane, Roy H. Hamilton
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(6): 614.     CrossRef
  • Suppressing contextually irrelevant meanings of homophonic versus heterophonic homographs: A tDCS study targeting LIFG
    Haim Raviv, Nira Mashal, Orna Peleg
    Brain and Cognition.2024; 181: 106212.     CrossRef
  • Innovative Therapy Combining Neck Muscle Vibration and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Association with Conventional Rehabilitation in Left Unilateral Spatial Neglect Patients: HEMISTIM Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sarah Millot, Jean-Marie Beis, Jonathan Pierret, Marina Badin, Verginia Sabau, Laurent Bensoussan, Jean Paysant, Hadrien Ceyte
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(4): 678.     CrossRef
  • Homonymous hemianopia and visual neglect: Part II ― rehabilitation
    Marina A. Shurupova, Alina D. Aizenshtein, Galina E. Ivanova
    Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation.2023; 5(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • The myth of TMS-induced ipsilateral enhancement in visual detection paradigms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of inhibitory parietal TMS studies in healthy participants
    Ting Wang, Tom de Graaf, Joshua Williams, Zhihao Wang, Teresa Schuhmann, Felix Duecker, Alexander T. Sack
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2023; 155: 105437.     CrossRef
  • Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke
    Baruc Campos, Hoseok Choi, Andrew T. DeMarco, Anna Seydell-Greenwald, Sara J. Hussain, Mary T. Joy, Peter E. Turkeltaub, William Zeiger
    The Journal of Neuroscience.2023; 43(45): 7489.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of scalp stimulation for multidomain cognitive impairment in patients with post‐stroke cognitive impairment and dementia: A network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of moderators
    Minjie Xu, Ying Li, Chi Zhang, Yanan Ma, Leyi Zhang, Yuai Yang, Zihan Zhang, Tiantian Meng, Junyi He, Haifang Wang, Shuren Li, Georg S Kranz, Mingjing Zhao, Jingling Chang
    Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2023; 16(4): 505.     CrossRef
  • Using non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation for neglect and associated attentional deficits following stroke
    Elena Olgiati, Paresh A. Malhotra
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2022; 32(5): 735.     CrossRef
  • From Patient to Musician: A Multi-Sensory Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Tool for Spatial Neglect
    Joris Heyse, Stéphanie Carlier, Ewoud Verhelst, Catharine Vander Linden, Femke De Backere, Filip De Turck
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(3): 1242.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Dosage and Associated Therapy on Motor Recovery Post-stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alan-Michael D. Chow, Jeonghwa Shin, Hongwu Wang, Jeremy Mikhail Kellawan, Hugo M. Pereira
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive neuromodulation for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lingling Li, Hailiang Huang
    Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(10): 5861.     CrossRef
  • Non‐invasive Brain Stimulation Can Reduce Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke: ELETRON Trial
    Taís Regina da Silva, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes, Laís Geronutti Martins, Rafael Dalle Molle da Costa, Juli Thomaz de Souza, Fernanda Cristina Winckler, Lorena Cristina Alvarez Sartor, Gabriel Pinheiro Modolo, Natalia Cristina Ferreira, Josiela Cristi
    Annals of Neurology.2022; 92(3): 400.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
    Anna Gorsler, Ulrike Grittner, Torsten Rackoll, Nadine Külzow
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    B. González-Rodriguez, N. Serradell-Ribé, R. Viejo-Sobera, J. P. Romero-Muñoz, Elena M. Marron
    Journal of Neurology.2022; 269(12): 6310.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect
    Gemma Learmonth, Christopher S.Y. Benwell, Gesine Märker, Diana Dascalu, Matthew Checketts, Celestine Santosh, Mark Barber, Matthew Walters, Keith W. Muir, Monika Harvey
    Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.2021; 31(8): 1163.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postural training using a whole-body tilt apparatus in subacute stroke patients with lateropulsion: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Chang-Man An, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Dae-hyun Kim, Gi-Wook Kim
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2021; 64(2): 101393.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing creativity by altering the frontoparietal control network functioning using transcranial direct current stimulation
    Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, Nira Mashal
    Experimental Brain Research.2021; 239(2): 613.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial electrostimulation with special waveforms enhances upper-limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Shih-Ching Chen, Ling-Yu Yang, Muhammad Adeel, Chien-Hung Lai, Chih-Wei Peng
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury
    Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after stroke
    Jitka Veldema, Kathrin Bösl, Günter Neumann, Geert Verheyden, Dennis Alexander Nowak
    CNS Spectrums.2020; 25(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Noninvasive Peripheral Stimulation for Neglect Syndrome Following Acquired Brain Injury
    Giuseppe Lucente, Josep Valls-Sole, Narda Murillo, John Rothwell, Jaume Coll, Antoni Davalos, Hatice Kumru
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2020; 23(3): 312.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Stroke Recovery Across the Life Span With Noninvasive Neurostimulation
    Sean Dukelow, Adam Kirton
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 37(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • P212 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke neglect rehabilitation: A research proposal for a triple blind controlled trial
    E.M. Marron, B. Gonzalez Rodríguez, D. de Noreña, M. Ríos Lago, J.P. Romero
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(4): e136.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery Following Brain Injury
    April Pruski, Gabriela Cantarero
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2020; 8(3): 268.     CrossRef
  • Kurzfassung der S1-Leitlinie „Rehabilitation bei Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126)
    Hans-Otto Karnath, Josef Zihl, Thomas Benke, Doris Brötz, Sabine Brinkmann, Helmut Hildebrandt, Georg Kerkhoff, Corina Kiesewalter, René Müri, Claus-W. Wallesch, Karl Wessel
    Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie.2020; 31(3): 129.     CrossRef
  • Relationship Between Line Bisection Test Time and Hemispatial Neglect Prognosis in Patients With Stroke: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Shinyoung Kwon, Wookyung Park, MinYoung Kim, Jong Moon Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 44(4): 292.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between Visual Perception and Microstructural Change of the Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus in Patients with Brain Injury in the Right Hemisphere: A Preliminary Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study
    Su-Hong Kim, Hyeong-Eun Jeon, Chan-Hyuk Park
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(9): 641.     CrossRef
  • Funktionserholung nach Schlaganfall und die therapeutische Rolle der nicht-invasiven Hirnstimulation
    Caroline Tscherpel, Christian Grefkes
    Klinische Neurophysiologie.2020; 51(04): 214.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke
    Bernhard Elsner, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Jan Mehrholz
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enfoques top-down y bottom-up para el tratamiento de la heminegligencia espacial en sujetos con ictus: revisión sistemática
    A. Dintén-Fernández, P. Fernández-González, A. Koutsou, I.M. Alguacil-Diego, S. Laguarta-Val, F. Molina-Rueda
    Rehabilitación.2019; 53(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review
    Eline C. C. van Lieshout, Roel F. van Hooijdonk, Rick M. Dijkhuizen, J. M. Anne Visser-Meily, Tanja C. W. Nijboer
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2019; 33(5): 355.     CrossRef
  • Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
    Paul Theo Zebhauser, Marine Vernet, Evelyn Unterburger, Anna-Katharine Brem
    Neuropsychology Review.2019; 29(4): 397.     CrossRef
  • Improving Naming Abilities Among Healthy Young-Old Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, Nira Mashal
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.2018; 47(1): 113.     CrossRef
  • Motor cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improves acute stroke visuo-spatial neglect: A series of four case reports
    S. Bornheim, P. Maquet, J.L. Croisier, J.M. Crielaard, J.F. Kaux
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(2): 459.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ana Paula S. Salazar, Patrícia G. Vaz, Ritchele R. Marchese, Cinara Stein, Camila Pinto, Aline S. Pagnussat
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2018; 99(2): 355.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Unilateral Neglect After Stroke
    Jingjing Fan, Yi Li, Yonghong Yang, Yun Qu, Shasha Li
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2018; 97(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016
    Deog Young Kim, Yun-Hee Kim, Jongmin Lee, Won Hyuk Chang, Min-Wook Kim, Sung-Bom Pyun, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Suk Hoon Ohn, Ki Deok Park, Byung-Mo Oh, Seong Hoon Lim, Kang Jae Jung, Byung-Ju Ryu, Sun Im, Sung Ju Jee, Han Gil Seo, Ueon Woo Rah, Joo Hyun Park, Min
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Enhance Attention
    L. C. Reteig, L. J. Talsma, M. R. van Schouwenburg, H. A. Slagter
    Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.2017; 1(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: The Impact of Baseline Severity and Task Specificity in a Pilot Sample
    Catherine Norise, Daniela Sacchetti, Roy Hamilton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of cerebrovascular accidents
    Alaa S. Bou Ghannam, Prem S. Subramanian
    Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.2017; 28(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • 9,130 View
  • 214 Download
  • 43 Web of Science
  • 47 Crossref
Effects of a Resting Foot Splint in Early Brain Injury Patients
Eun Jung Sung, Min Ho Chun, Ja Young Hong, Kyung Hee Do
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(1):135-141.   Published online February 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.135
Objective

To assess the effectiveness of the resting foot splint to prevent ankle contracture.

Methods

We performed a randomized controlled trial in 33 patients with brain injury with ankle dorsiflexor weakness (muscle power ≤grade 2). Both groups continued conventional customized physical therapy, but the patients in the foot splint group were advised to wear a resting foot splint for more than 12 hours per day for 3 weeks. The data were assessed before and 3 weeks after the study. The primary outcome was the change in ankle dorsiflexion angle after 3 weeks.

Results

Before the study, there were no differences between groups in gender, age, time post-injury, brain injury type, initial edema, spasticity, passive range of ankle dorsiflexion, Fugl-Meyer score (FMS), or Functional Ambulation Classification. A significant improvement in ankle dorsiflexion angle, and FMS was found after 3 weeks in both groups. The splint group showed more spasticity than the control group after 3 weeks (p=0.04). The change of ankle dorsiflexion angle, foot circumference, spasticity, and FMS after adjusting initial value and spasticity were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Wearing a resting foot splint for 3 weeks did not affect joint mobility in patients with subacute brain injury regularly attending personalized rehabilitation programs. Further studies of larger sample sizes with well controlled in spasticity are required to evaluate the effects of the resting foot splint.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Different Stages of Post-Traumatic Elbow Joint Capsule Healing on Pronation Movement
    Fang Wang, Xin-Jie Chang, Ming-Xin Li, Ming-Ze Zhou, Bo-Tian Tian, Jian-Guo Zhang, Yu-Bo Fan
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering.2024; 44(5): 740.     CrossRef
  • Assistive technologies, including orthotic devices, for the management of contractures in adults after a stroke
    Rasheed Ahamed Mohammed Meeran, Venugopal Durairaj, Padmanaban Sekaran, Sybil E Farmer, Anand D Pandyan
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of traction therapy on muscle satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in a rat model of knee stiffness
    Xiaoqian Lv, Xiaoyu Wang, Jianxing Yue, Xin Wang, Haoyue Chen, Qiang Gao
    Stem Cell Research & Therapy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Different Static Progressive Stretching Durations on Range of Motion, Myofibroblasts, and Collagen in a Posttraumatic Knee Contracture Rat Model
    Lu Wang, Jian-Bo Cui, Hui-Min Xie, Xiu-Qin Zuo, Jia-Le He, Zi-Shan Jia, Li-Ning Zhang
    Physical Therapy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Helpt het dragen van een spalk tegen spitsvoeten?
    Anne van Trigt
    Nursing.2021; 27(4): 22.     CrossRef
  • Non-drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps
    Fiona Hawke, Sean G Sadler, Hans Dieter Katzberg, Fereshteh Pourkazemi, Vivienne Chuter, Joshua Burns
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of robo-assisted lower limb rehabilitation for spastic patients: A systematic review
    Divya Shakti, Lini Mathew, Neelesh Kumar, Chitra Kataria
    Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2018; 117: 403.     CrossRef
  • 9,522 View
  • 75 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
TOP