• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

2
results for

"Bong Ok Kim"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Bong Ok Kim"

Original Articles
The Effect of Electric Cortical Stimulation after Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
Yong-Soon Yoon, Ki Pi Yu, Hyojoon Kim, Hyoung-ihl Kim, Soo Hyun Kwak, Bong Ok Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(5):596-608.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.596
Objective

To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation in the experimentally induced focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) rat model on motor recovery and plasticity of the injured brain.

Method

Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a single pellet reaching task (SPRT) and on a Rotarod task (RRT) for 14 days. Then, the TBI model was induced by a weight drop device (40 g in weight, 25 cm in height) on the dominant motor cortex, and the electrode was implanted over the perilesional cortical surface. All rats were divided into two groups as follows: Electrical stimulation (ES) group with anodal continuous stimulation (50 Hz and 194 µs duration) or Sham-operated control (SOC) group with no electrical stimulation. The rats were trained SPRT and RRT for 14 days for rehabilitation and measured Garcia's neurologic examination. Histopathological and immunostaining evaluations were performed after the experiment.

Results

There were no differences in the slice number in the histological analysis. Garcia's neurologic scores & SPRT were significantly increased in the ES group (p<0.05), yet, there was no difference in RRT in both groups. The ES group showed more expression of c-Fos around the brain injured area than the SOC group.

Conclusion

Electric cortical stimulation with rehabilitation is considered to be one of the trial methods for motor recovery in TBI. However, more studies should be conducted for the TBI model in order to establish better stimulation methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intracranial Neuromodulation for Neurologic Recovery
    Angela Madira, Muhib Khan, Rushna Ali
    Contemporary Neurosurgery.2024; 46(5): 1.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Acute Stage of Traumatic Brain Injury Improves Functional Recovery
    Liang-Chao Wang, Wei-Yen Wei, Pei-Chuan Ho
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 1965.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Invasive Surgical Approaches
    Jakov Tiefenbach, Hugh H. Chan, Andre G. Machado, Kenneth B. Baker
    Neurosurgery.2022; 91(6): 823.     CrossRef
  • Restoration of arm and hand functions via noninvasive cervical cord neuromodulation after traumatic brain injury: a case study
    Qiuyang Qian, Yan To Ling, Hui Zhong, Yong-Ping Zheng, Monzurul Alam
    Brain Injury.2020; 34(13-14): 1771.     CrossRef
  • A new model of experimental hemispherotomy in young adult Rattus norvegicus: a neural tract tracing and SPECT in vivo study
    Ivair Matias, Daoud Hibrahim Elias-Filho, Camila Araújo Bernardino Garcia, Guilherme Henrique Silva, Jorge Mejia, Francisco Romero Cabral, Ana Cláudia Camargo Miranda, Sérgio Gomes da Silva, Luíza da Silva Lopes, Norberto Cysne Coimbra, Hélio Rubens Macha
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2019; 130(4): 1210.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Electric Cortical Stimulation (ECS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Rats With a Traumatic Brain Injury
    Ki Pi Yu, Yong-Soon Yoon, Jin Gyeong Lee, Ji Sun Oh, Jeong-Seog Lee, Taeyong Seog, Han-Young Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(4): 502.     CrossRef
  • High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating moderate traumatic brain injury in rats: A pilot study
    Xia Lu, Xinjie Bao, Jiantao Li, Guanghao Zhang, Jian Guan, Yunzhou Gao, Peilin Wu, Zhaohui Zhu, Xiaolin Huo, Renzhi Wang
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2017; 13(5): 2247.     CrossRef
  • Motor cortex stimulation does not lead to functional recovery after experimental cortical injury in rats
    Lisa-Maria Schönfeld, Ali Jahanshahi, Evi Lemmens, Matthias Bauwens, Sarah-Anna Hescham, Sandra Schipper, Melanie Lagiere, Sven Hendrix, Yasin Temel
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(3): 295.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Epidural Electrical Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Rats With Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury
    Yong-Soon Yoon, Kang Hee Cho, Eun-Sil Kim, Mi-Sook Lee, Kwang Jae Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(3): 416.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation for traumatic brain injury
    Samuel S. Shin, C. Edward Dixon, David O. Okonkwo, R. Mark Richardson
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2014; 121(5): 1219.     CrossRef
  • 5,590 View
  • 45 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function
Min Kyun Sohn, Bong Ok Kim, Hyun Tak Song
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(1):1-7.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.1
Objective

To evaluate motor excitability and hand function on the non-dominant side according to the polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex in a healthy person.

Method

tDCS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 15 minutes at an intensity of 1 mA in 28 healthy right-handed adults. Subjects were divided randomly into four groups: an anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, a cathodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, an anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere group, and a sham group. We measured the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the abductor pollicis brevis and Jabsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT) in the non-dominant hand prior to and following tDCS. All study procedures were done under double-blind design.

Results

There was a significant increase in the MEP amplitude and a significant improvement in the JTT in the non-dominant hand following anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere (p<0.05). But there was no change in JTT and a significant decrease in the MEP amplitude in the non-dominant hand following cathodal tDCS on the non-dominant hemisphere and anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere.

Conclusion

Non-dominant hand function is improved by increased excitability of the motor cortex. Although motor cortex excitability is decreased in a healthy person, non-dominant hand function is maintained. A homeostatic mechanism in the brain might therefore be involved in preserving this function. Further studies are warranted to examine brain functions to clarify this mechanism.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Excitability of the Unstimulated Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex
    Erik W. Wilkins, Richard J. Young, Ryder Davidson, Reese Krider, George Alhwayek, Jonathan A. Park, Armaan C. Parikh, Zachary A. Riley, Brach Poston
    Brain Sciences.2025; 15(5): 512.     CrossRef
  • Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere
    Erik W. Wilkins, Richard J. Young, Daniel Houston, Eric Kawana, Edgar Lopez Mora, Meghana S. Sunkara, Zachary A. Riley, Brach Poston
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(7): 694.     CrossRef
  • Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude in Motor Behavior-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Systematic Review
    Jennifer L. Ryan, Emily Eng, Darcy L. Fehlings, F. Virginia Wright, Danielle E. Levac, Deryk S. Beal
    Journal of Motor Behavior.2023; 55(3): 313.     CrossRef
  • Hemispheric Differences of 1 Hz rTMS over Motor and Premotor Cortex in Modulation of Neural Processing and Hand Function
    Jitka Veldema, Dennis Alexander Nowak, Kathrin Bösl, Alireza Gharabaghi
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • tDCS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the trained hand enhances cross-limb transfer in older adults
    Elisabeth Kaminski, Tom Maudrich, Pauline Bassler, Madeleine Ordnung, Arno Villringer, Patrick Ragert
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhanced Motor Learning on Robotic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Maps in Children
    Adrianna Giuffre, Ephrem Zewdie, James G. Wrightson, Lauran Cole, Helen L. Carlson, Hsing-Ching Kuo, Ali Babwani, Adam Kirton
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Audiological Practice: The Gaps to Be Filled
    Mujda Nooristani, Thomas Augereau, Karina Moïn-Darbari, Benoit-Antoine Bacon, François Champoux
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper-Limb Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ronak Patel, James Ashcroft, Ashish Patel, Hutan Ashrafian, Adam J. Woods, Harsimrat Singh, Ara Darzi, Daniel Richard Leff
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols
    Jared Cooney Horvath, Olivia Carter, Jason D. Forte
    Neuropsychologia.2016; 91: 544.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization
    Bernadette T. Gillick, Adam Kirton, Jason B. Carmel, Preet Minhas, Marom Bikson
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control
    Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Reza Shadmehr
    Experimental Brain Research.2014; 232(11): 3379.     CrossRef
  • Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age
    Kirstin-Friederike Heise, Martina Niehoff, J.-F. Feldheim, Gianpiero Liuzzi, Christian Gerloff, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,986 View
  • 52 Download
  • 12 Crossref
TOP